512Mb for 2900XT was not enough - so it has bad results in heavy videomodes
1Gb of memory will give a great boost
512Mb for 2900XT was not enough - so it has bad results in heavy videomodes
1Gb of memory will give a great boost
Right 2 cards and less CPU usage with CF.
But let we talk freely, when will this card hit retail ?
1-2 mounts when g80 will be 1 year old architecture and will be cheaper for sure. Now we have ~500$ for GTX and due to less heat overclocked can beat 2900XT 1gb GDDR4 even in 3dmarks comparing your scores. All ATI drivers right now are on open beta state, so in games there is no need to compare them even
I think last year ATI made lots of disappointments and this card, would be the continuation of the saga
P67B3 SB D2@5.1G_1.47v :bow: SA PSC GF110 SSDS SPI-6.79 06-37580 Vantage-P36245
If life gives you a computer...OVERCLOCK IT! :yoda:
nice scoores
Core Quad Q9300
ASUS P5Q-PRO
4GB RAM
Ati Radeon 4890
Enermax Liberty 620w
Very nice scores...I really need an HD2900XT...my board is begging for some real VGA power!
• Intel Core i7 875K @ 3.86GHz 1.35v /w Intel Extreme Tower Heatsink
• Intel Extreme DP55KG
• 2x2GB Kingston HyperX PC3-10666
• ATI HD5970 2GB @ 850/1,200
• Lian-Li PC-7B
• Corsair TX750 PSU
Hi Denny why did you clock that second Card only to 500/500 ?
Some further question your a girl or a guy denny ?
Last edited by aNNixP; 06-03-2007 at 11:22 AM.
It's what i think too, specially cause the ring controller (512/1024bit in 2 ways) is designed for 1024Mo GDDR4.. this should be enough for stop the big lost of FPS with AA @ High res.. ( but i think the problem come too of a better optimisation for the AA, 7.5 have begin solve this prob on some games..)
Nice bench Denny, and i like the perfect quality of the pics you have put on the thread..
afaik its a core (r600) problem. no amount of memory bandwidth or size will help that. the current big losses aren't due to memory bandwidth as the current 2900XT has enough memory bandwidth so deal with any AA the GPU can delve out.
as far as ATI's own engineers have said the GPU is built around CSAA which should be used more in future games.
E6420 @ 3.2gHz
Asus P5K Deluxe
2GB OCZ DDR2-1066 Platinum
Powercolor HD 2900XT
OCZ 700W Gamexstream
will this give the 8800gtx a run for it's money?
Nice scores Denny Keep them coming.
Core i7 3770K
EVGA GTX780 + Surround
EVGA GTX670
EVGA Z77 FTW
8GB (2x4GB) G.Skill 1600Mhz DDR3
Ultra X3 1000w PSU PSU
Windows 7 Pro 64bit
Thermaltake Xaser VI
any info on price-range for these puppies??
Probably a 100 bucks plus for this card.
|ASUS Sabertooth Z77|Intel Core I7-2700K|32GB G.Skill TridentX F3-2400C10Q-32GTX|Corsair AX1200W|
|ASUS GTX TITAN + Zotac GTX680 for PhysX|Samsung S27A950D|Corsair Obsidian 800D|Corsair Hydro Series H100|
|ASUS Crosshair IV Formula|AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE|16GB G.Skill RipjawsX F3-12800CL7D-8GBXH|
|2X AMD Radeon HD6970 Crossfire|TT Kandalf - MOD|Corsair HX1000W|Corsair Hydro Series H70|
so probably still cheaper than a 8800Gtx?So still not a 8800GTX killer than,lol....
i use p975 4.4G yesterday which is 8x+8x, the only score increase is CPU score XD
and then i back to P965 4.4Gtodat which is 16x+4x... same score...
makes me believe CF doesn't make a lot of different on 16x + 4x or 8x + 8x
You got two bridges, thats not suprising. But it is good news for the rest of us.
My watercooling experience
Water
Scythe Gentle Typhoons 120mm 1850RPM
Thermochill PA120.3 Radiator
Enzotech Sapphire Rev.A CPU Block
Laing DDC 3.2
XSPC Dual Pump Reservoir
Primochill Pro LRT Red 1/2"
Bitspower fittings + water temp sensor
Rig
E8400 | 4GB HyperX PC8500 | Corsair HX620W | ATI HD4870 512MB
I see what I see, and you see what you see. I can't make you see what I see, but I can tell you what I see is not what you see. Truth is, we see what we want to see, and what we want to see is what those around us see. And what we don't see is... well, conspiracies.
good article on the effects of different slot combinations:
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/03/...ling_analysis/
seems the biggest loss is when using 4x. the article also shows that it really does pay to have a board with 2 16x slots, but only REALLY matters when running this latest generation of cards.
E6420 @ 3.2gHz
Asus P5K Deluxe
2GB OCZ DDR2-1066 Platinum
Powercolor HD 2900XT
OCZ 700W Gamexstream
@P35 Asus P5K-D motherboard, Intel Quadcord 4.5G, GSKILL 2GBHZ 1023 CL4
16x+4x, PCIE 120
3Dmark05 close to 29k
3Dmark06............... SM2 8218 and SM3 9053
================================================== ===========================
@P975 Asus P5WDH motherboard, Intel Quadcord, GSKILL 2GBHZ 1015 CL4
8x+8x PCIE 138
4G
3Dmark06............... 20056
it is my 1st time see GPU no mod overclock and stock cooler with 20k+ on 06
4.4G
3Dmark06
but even with ~4.5G
3Dmark05............... 28230
game1 and game 2 much lower than P35
but game 3 is up to 193 FPS, 5 extra FPS increase shows GPU power is much higher than P35 GPU power
Last edited by guess2098; 06-06-2007 at 07:38 AM.
Denny, are you sure that the P5K-D uses 16x and 8x? Isnt it 16x and 4x?
With better cooling and overclock of both cards, K|ngp|n's record of 24.4k seems to be within reach...
オタク
"Perfection is a state you should always try to attain, yet one you can never reach." - me =)
nice
Bookmarks