[WR] 2*256 BH5 ADATA @ 309.55Mhz !!!

[boblemagnifique]

First Test



http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=78178

Fx 55 Cabce 0516 WPMW (Thank Before)
DFI NF4 ultra D (BIOS 310p)
2*256 ADATA BH5 (0307we 0054 & 0313 0197) Rad Revoltec = 4v
Msi X300se 128mo
Fortron 500w Blue Storm
Cooling = Caskade


Benchs Max Superpi 1mo Not Optimised






Benchs Max Superpi 32mo Not Optimised




The installation was made with what I had under the hand, it is very very precarious!!! not Very good contact because Big Typhoon blocks me to put it well at the center rams











To Follow .......

[rastaseb]

bob, the roxxxor!!!

[pancake]

not bad, but i i think all the other bh5 records were done with 1T. I could be wrong though.

[Learn]

Great work BOB :d

han.... 2T

[Lastviking]

Maybe you got WR of Adata sticks but not with 2x256mb bh5 yet , but you are damn close to it.

[afireinside]

So your phase cooled 2T timing bh5 @ 298mhz with a 309mhz picture is a WR? Then whats lastvikings 300+ mhz BH5 1m runs with 1T and air cooling? Crap?

[Lastviking]

Hmm 1.43vcore and 3.98vdimm , hmm do you want to kill your cpu?

[afireinside]

Hmm 1.43vcore and 3.98vdimm , hmm do you want to kill your cpu?

It's fine. I've done it and others have. It won't kill anything. That was just the excuse used for the DFI boards spiking to 3vcore and killing CPUs.

[Lastviking]

It's fine. I've done it and others have. It won't kill anything. That was just the excuse used for the DFI boards spiking to 3vcore and killing CPUs.

K thx for info.

[uOpt]

First time I have seen somebody using a cascade on the RAM and air for the CPU

As Viking said, watch your low volts on the CPU.

[Fixxxer]

Not bad, but not a WR.

Try it @1T.

[Supertim0r]

It's fine. I've done it and others have. It won't kill anything. That was just the excuse used for the DFI boards spiking to 3vcore and killing CPUs.

hahaha RGR

[Absolute_0]

Go easy on him, it's still damn impressive. And the phase change on the ram? About time i saw that, made my day

[uOpt]

Hmm 1.43vcore and 3.98vdimm , hmm do you want to kill your cpu?

Actually if we assume the diodes break through at 0.6 V then you need 1.40 V CPU for 4.0 V RAM.

Since "1.43 V" is DFI speak for "1.475 or so actually" this is within the safety zone of the second table that we had.

[Lastviking]

Go easy on him, it's still damn impressive. And the phase change on the ram? About time i saw that, made my day

You have right thats why i wrote that he is very close i think with some fine tuning he will be more closer or more.

[Lastviking]

Actually if we assume the diodes break through at 0.6 V then you need 1.40 V CPU for 4.0 V RAM.

Since "1.43 V" is DFI speak for "1.475 or so actually" this is within the safety zone of the second table that we had.

3.98 vdimm is more like 4.04v+ real dont forget that and vtt is more 2.04v real(it was so on 2 of my boards i checked)

[[XC]melymel]

Phase cooled ram!!!! im impressed even if it aint the WR darn amazing, congrats and push for the WR

[andL64]

very impressive, keep it on bob!

[lawrywild]

no WR but still very impressive

well done :thumbsup:

[boblemagnifique]

Maybe you got WR of Adata sticks but not with 2x256mb bh5 yet , but you are damn close to it.

I know, but I do not see or I have say that I had the WR under superpi in frequency max???

On the other hand in the Title it is well the WR Frequence max in screen it seems to me (308.8mhz for you)

Finally for 20 minutes, I have been able to say that I have the WR under superpi 1mo in Frequency max with BH5

[Cooper]

Great OCing. Congrats

[Lastviking]

I know, but I do not see or I have say that I had the WR under superpi in frequency max???

On the other hand in the Title it is well the WR Frequence max in screen it seems to me (308.8mhz for you)

Finally for 20 minutes, I have been able to say that I have the WR under superpi 1mo in Frequency max with BH5

Gratz..T2 is one thing T1 is another thing if you compare my score with yours do you really think if i didnt use T1 and used T2 instead didnt give me any more mhz?. Yes if your topic was max screen 309mhz T2 WR i would be another thing. Lets leave thats behind know.

I cant realy give you some fight yet, i´m only have nf2 know.

[quent]

Gratz..T2 is one thing T1 is another thing if you compare my score with yours do you really think if i didnt use T1 and used T2 instead didnt give me any more mhz?. Yes if your topic was max screen 309mhz T2 WR i would be another thing. Lets leave thats behind know.

I cant realy give you some fight yet, i´m only have nf2 know.

T2/T1 doesn't matter, it's a frequency WR, T2 is just a timing

[Lastviking]

T2/T1 doesn't matter, it's a frequency WR, T2 is just a timing

K next time i run 2.5-3-3 T2

[boblemagnifique]

Gratz..T2 is one thing T1 is another thing if you compare my score with yours do you really think if i didnt use T1 and used T2 instead didnt give me any more mhz?. Yes if your topic was max screen 309mhz T2 WR i would be another thing. Lets leave thats behind know.

I cant realy give you some fight yet, i´m only have nf2 know.

I have to test in 1T this morning (during the sp1 304mhz has) I also remake 309.5mhz but 310mhz i doesn t arrive there (screen F5 yes but not valid cpuz)

if that can please to you will remake a max screen has 309mhz in 1T as that it will have there no more problem to say that the 2T goes up more than the 1T, test and you will see