Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 43

Thread: 2GB! Xtreme Divider! Not so Xtreme Bandwidth!

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,428

    2GB Samsung UCCC! Xtreme Divider! Not so Xtreme Bandwidth!

    Looks like I may be on the right track now trying to get 2gigs of memory to run for EQ2. I took two wrong turns with attempts with 2x1024 Geil Value sticks (now happily sitting in my P4 rig at 269:215 5:4 divider after failing to hit stock speeds on my LP-NF4-SLI-DR when using any divider) and a 4x512mb mixed set of TMSP CH and BH UTT which I finally gave up on this morning due to them being extremely sensitive to voltage and timings. The UTT are either pulling in different directions due to some differences, or the newer set (which I never tested alone) is an underachiever.

    After thinking about getting some OCZ or Gigaram (who?) I finally decided on getting two sticks of Transcend 1GB. Why Transcend? Because like me, they are cheap. Also, reading that they used Samsung UCCC, piqued my curiosity.

    After struggling so long with the UTT I just wanted to start playing games as soon as possible (yes I wanted to kill something) so I set everything to auto except the major timings and also selected a Tref Eva2000 suggested for the 414-3 bios. I went straight for the 2:3 133 divider knowing I'd need it to get my 3000+ anywhere close to its ceiling. Ran off memtest #5 until I was satified I wouldn't bork my Win OS and started a SuperPi 32M. Went outside to wash the car, when I came back in I was surprised to find that it had finished.



    I'd like to get any suggestions anyone might have on how to push it a bit. I know 1gig stick won't OC much but I would like to get the bandwidth numbers up some more. In the meantime I'm going to game test them. City of Heroes has free play for any old accounts that have expired, this weekend. Check out my character TheClap on the Justice server.
    Last edited by gundamit; 05-31-2005 at 06:28 AM.
    Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,428
    Wow! This thread is on fire! One view in one day and I think it was mine. CPU-Z statistics report only 2.75% of users are running 2gigs so I suppose that would explain the interest.

    I'd pushed for more but my processor doesn't want to hit its old 3ghz 24/7 gaming speeds with 2gigs. I dropped the multi down to 8 and I can go to 222 speed on the memory before it giv errors on memtest.

    Going to see if its game stable at 2.9ghz
    Last edited by gundamit; 06-01-2005 at 09:02 AM.
    Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,428
    In less than a day the views have doubled ... going from one to two! With that kind of interest how I can I fail to at least try to push this memory farther. 2.9Ghz proved game stable so I took a stab at 3ghz. Looking good right now.



    But thats about the limit for my Winnie, so I'll have to drop the multi to 8 and maybe go with another divider if I want to play with it further. I'm still looking for more suggestions on tref/dividers combos.

    Maybe I should have gone with a less goofy thread title? If I had gone with something like "World Record CPU OC using 2Gig " I would have had members running in here since "WR" usually works like a laxitive on some members. Maybe someone has access to the CPU-Z database and the 2% of records with 2gig of memory, so they can confirm I do not in fact have a an obscure and useless record.
    Last edited by gundamit; 05-31-2005 at 04:18 AM.
    Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    970
    Very nice!
    Opteron 165
    Dfi NF4 Expert
    4x1 1GB twinmos PC 3200
    XFX 7900GT 550/1500

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,428
    Thanks Crankster. I thought I was the only one reading this stuff.

    To give you an idea of how the bandwidth might scale if my Winnie were willing, I ran one more test before I retreat on the multi.
    Last edited by gundamit; 05-31-2005 at 05:58 AM.
    Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.

  6. #6
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    nice

    i think the large slow loading images have something to do with lack of replies heh
    ---

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,428
    Eva2000, glad to see you here since you're the one who really started this mess with your post on the OCZ 2x1024. Sorry about the pic size or hosting slowing everything down, but I think the real reason is still the lack of interest (at least among pure benchers, not gamers - and maybe not a lot of the latter) in 2gig set-ups.

    I think these sticks will do very close to what your OCZ did (they're getting real flaky around 230 now) but won't match on bandwidth. Still price wise they're a pretty good deal.

    I wonder what these sticks would do in the hands of a master? Yes, that is a none too subtle hint ...
    Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,428
    Bah! These sticks might be all in at 220. They seem very sensitive to voltage adjustments. Next weekend I'll play with the timings a bit more and see if going back to the standard pin arrangement on the voltage jumpers makes any difference.
    Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,948
    nice topic I think. I'm interested in upgrading to 2gb myself. My experiences with 2GB kits are that they will run fine at or near 200mhz but much past that and I have problems. Not sure if it's my memory controller or what?
    it's never fast enough!

  10. #10
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    4,678
    nice results. One way to get higher bandwith would be to lower the cas to 2.5 Not sure if u can though.
    "Victory is always possible for the person who refuses to stop fighting"

    clicks to save kids

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by JNav89GT
    My experiences with 2GB kits are that they will run fine at or near 200mhz but much past that and I have problems. Not sure if it's my memory controller or what?
    I think it's the high-density chips. I haven't seen anyone post high overclocks or low latencies with 2x1GB setups.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,428
    If you have to have 2gigs in your system which is the better choice? 2x1024 with loose timings, small overclock and 1T ... or ... 4x512 tight timings respectble overclock and 2T? I was leaning towards 4x512 before, but now it seems if you can get your dividers working you still have a good chance to get a nice CPU OC. As far as the performance difference with 4x512, I noticed that OPB has a picture showing a 3000+ Winnie with 4x512 Gskill PC4800 running 9x300 1:1 2.5-4-3-5 with a 32M SuperPi checking in 29:33. What conclusion would draw from those numbers?

    At some point I would hope memory controllers would imporve to the point where 4x512 1T would be possible. But that same improvement might also improve the OC ability of 2x1024. The question may never be settled before we all move off to DDR2 and then all bets are off.

    I'm still game for another go at 4x512. I ordered another pair of TWSP UTT from NewEgg this morning.

    Here's a link to OPB's fuzzy screenshot.
    Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.

  13. #13
    XS News
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    766
    hmm... I'd probably go with the 2x 1gb.. so you can keep 1t and everything.. 220mhz isnt too bad beats the heck out of my512mb stick of generic stuff

    Would like to see some benchies tho.
    AMD Athlon 64 3700+ @ 300x10________15" Macbook Pro
    2x 512mb Mushkin DDR _______________2x 1Gb DDR2
    Sapphire X850XT____________________X1600M
    DFI Ultra-D_________________________2.16Ghz Merom C2D
    Lian-Li PC7A________________________OS X/XP
    PCP&C 610w Silencer

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,428
    Quote Originally Posted by dippyskoodlez
    Would like to see some benchies tho.
    I pretty sure when I get my 4x512 set-up going, it'll be close on SuperPi but I'm not sure how the 3D will play out. I'll start posting results on Saturday.
    Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    20
    Corsair
    http://www.corsairmemory.com/corsair...erformance.pdf
    tested various timings using DOOM3 @ 640x480. That's not a typical gaming scenario these days, but at least it uses the RAM in a realistic way.

    Compared to 2-2-2-5-1T.
    3-2-2-5-1T is 2.54% slower.
    2-3-2-5-1T is 2.25% slower.
    2-2-3-5-1T is 0.66% slower.
    2-2-2-5-2T is 3.29% slower.
    2-2-2-8-1T is equal to 2-2-2-5-1T, so we can ignore tRAS.

    Do a little math, and it appears that 2-2-2-2T will outperform 3-3-3-1T, by about 2%. 2-3-2-1T and 2-2-2-2T appear to be about equal.

    ATM, I'm thinking 4x512 DS will have a slight edge on 4x512 SS and 2x1GB, but that the differences will be small and price will probably govern my choice of 2GB solutions.

    Though increased overclocks with the 4x solutions might not get much more performance, the flexibility might come in handy when overclocking the CPU. Patriot's 2-3-2 2x1GB apparently won't even overclock to 209 at stock timings.

    Quote Originally Posted by gundamit
    I'm still game for another go at 4x512. I ordered another pair of TWSP UTT from NewEgg this morning.[/URL]
    Looking forward to your results.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    970
    Freecableguy did 4x512 BH-5 @ 250 2-2-2-5 btw.
    So it has been done. He was on an intel platform though and i haven't seen very much A64 and 2 gig about. Intel with HT and stuff seems to be more fitting for 2 gigs.
    I'm sure that will change with X2 from amd.
    Opteron 165
    Dfi NF4 Expert
    4x1 1GB twinmos PC 3200
    XFX 7900GT 550/1500

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,428
    Quote Originally Posted by gundamit
    Bah! These sticks might be all in at 220. They seem very sensitive to voltage adjustments.
    Very sensitive. Just altered the speed and voltage a bit. 2.7v + the +.03v option on in the bios. Now at 225 and posting a better SuperPi 32M than the 2x1024 OCZ Eva2000 had at the same CPU and memory speed. Just a different divider, multi and HTT.
    Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Arlington, Texas
    Posts
    210
    with all that money you're spending, might as well get a venice core for the better memory controller! i'd say go for 2x1g with the wichester core, but if you do go venice, id try 4x512 bh-5
    edit: hmm 4x512 tccd might be a good idea.. with less voltage requirements they will be more stable than bh-5, im guessing at 2gig vdimm related stability is a problem..
    Last edited by R.Rabbit; 06-01-2005 at 11:53 AM.
    "each driver release plays whack-a-mole with a few more annoyances" -inq

  19. #19
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    Quote Originally Posted by Otter
    Corsair
    http://www.corsairmemory.com/corsair...erformance.pdf
    tested various timings using DOOM3 @ 640x480. That's not a typical gaming scenario these days, but at least it uses the RAM in a realistic way.

    Compared to 2-2-2-5-1T.
    3-2-2-5-1T is 2.54% slower.
    2-3-2-5-1T is 2.25% slower.
    2-2-3-5-1T is 0.66% slower.
    2-2-2-5-2T is 3.29% slower.
    2-2-2-8-1T is equal to 2-2-2-5-1T, so we can ignore tRAS.

    Do a little math, and it appears that 2-2-2-2T will outperform 3-3-3-1T, by about 2%. 2-3-2-1T and 2-2-2-2T appear to be about equal.

    ATM, I'm thinking 4x512 DS will have a slight edge on 4x512 SS and 2x1GB, but that the differences will be small and price will probably govern my choice of 2GB solutions.

    Though increased overclocks with the 4x solutions might not get much more performance, the flexibility might come in handy when overclocking the CPU. Patriot's 2-3-2 2x1GB apparently won't even overclock to 209 at stock timings.


    Looking forward to your results.
    My PDP did 230-240 3-3-3 2.75v on my Intel so you must have seen some bad sticks...

    Anyway here is some Redline, never got them running at 2-2-2 like they were rated though

    http://home.neb.rr.com/soulburner/My...50%204x512.jpg

    The Ballistix look really good though, there is a thread here with a similar clock but 2x1gb will get you a 1T timing and quite a bit less volts than a 4x512 setup. Still debating whether changing them out for 1T is worth it over 2T? I'm not sure it would be if it is only going to get me a few fps.
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

  20. #20
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,428
    @ Soulburner. Nice Redline 4x512 at 250. I'm sure any combination of 2x512 they're doing a lot better. I'd be more than a little happy if I can get 4x512 TMSP at 250 because thats where I have run my old Mushkin old BH-5 and TMSP CH UTT 2x512 to get my CPU at its 24/7 game stable speed of 3ghz. I'll settle for 240. The tie breaker on whether I go with 2x1024 1T or 4x512 2T will be a few 3D tests, bandwidth and seat of the pants tests.

    Any chance you'll be posting up some bandwidth results running your memory at that speed/timing but with the multi set a bit higher?
    Last edited by gundamit; 06-02-2005 at 02:29 AM.
    Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    119
    How about that? This was posted @ XS some time ago. I have no idea by whome, don't quite remember. Would really like to have a word with that gentleman..

    Personally, i've ordered 2 kits of TwinMOS Twister BH-5 1GB (2x512MB). IC / Winbond UTT BH-5. I'll also hook up a 25cfm 80mm FAN right on the 4 DIMM slots, since all of them will get populated. The whole shabang arrives next week, we'll post results.
    3200+ 'Venice' + PowerStream 520 + DFI nF4
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Venice_3200+_311x9_1.5v.jpg 
Views:	275 
Size:	180.8 KB 
ID:	31774  
    Last edited by tjj; 06-02-2005 at 02:40 AM.

  22. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by Soulburner
    My PDP did 230-240 3-3-3 2.75v on my Intel so you must have seen some bad sticks...
    Maybe not. You either loosened the timings or you've got the 3-3-3 "signature" series RAM. The timings matter because low latency is more important for an A64 than high bandwidth. 2-3-2 @200 will probably beat 3-3-3 @235 if the CPU is an A64.

    With a P4, of course, it's the other way around. Timings don't matter much because latency is going to be high anyway, but bandwidth is very important.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    192
    Tjj. That guy has insane 2GB action! Personally I'm gonna need 2GB action when X2 comes along, 1 GB for each core. I just hope that the X2 mem controllers are up to it.

    Somehow however I don't think they would be much better then Venice or SD if they are at all.........

    We will have to wait till A64 gets DDR2 action. By then I reckon there will be 4-2-2-x @ 800Mhz 1GB modules around. Personally I hope that I will be able to use 4 of these hypothetical babys. Hoping that the next gen A64 controllers are up to it!
    Q6600 @ 3.0 | 8GB G-Skill @ 800 Mhz 5-5-5-20 | ATI 3870 Stock 1 x 500 GB Seagate 7200.11
    1 x 1TB Seagate 7200.11 | 2 x 320GB Seagate 7200.10
    Seasonic S12-550 Energy +CM Stacker

  24. #24
    XS News
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    766
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikesta
    Tjj. That guy has insane 2GB action! Personally I'm gonna need 2GB action when X2 comes along, 1 GB for each core. I just hope that the X2 mem controllers are up to it.

    Somehow however I don't think they would be much better then Venice or SD if they are at all.........

    We will have to wait till A64 gets DDR2 action. By then I reckon there will be 4-2-2-x @ 800Mhz 1GB modules around. Personally I hope that I will be able to use 4 of these hypothetical babys. Hoping that the next gen A64 controllers are up to it!
    With the X2, you cannotseperate 1gb for each core, like the opterons- they share a single memory controller.
    AMD Athlon 64 3700+ @ 300x10________15" Macbook Pro
    2x 512mb Mushkin DDR _______________2x 1Gb DDR2
    Sapphire X850XT____________________X1600M
    DFI Ultra-D_________________________2.16Ghz Merom C2D
    Lian-Li PC7A________________________OS X/XP
    PCP&C 610w Silencer

  25. #25
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    bakersfield ca
    Posts
    872
    buy ballistix 1gb kit then you are guaranteed 250mhz or your money back from them 30day

    also most of those kits do 2.5-2-2 at 250mhz so i would seriously consider that and keeping 1t timing over 2t timing and 4x512 of utt stuffs
    ________
    Kitchen Measures
    Last edited by brandinb; 05-03-2011 at 07:44 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •