Page 1 of 22 123411 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 540

Thread: Onepagebook, coolaler and Superpi

  1. #1
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338

    Onepagebook, coolaler and Superpi

    First off, in light of TaPaKaH's recent admittance of faking everything, we're not scheming to get anyone, or anything like that. He did on his own. However, let's put that in perspective as well. We were all fooled for MONTHS. That's how possible, legitimate, and prevalent cheating really is....and it's a shame.

    In zbogorgon's recent thread: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=125972 , he further elucidates how cheating can be done easily....he's due a lot of credit for coming forward and bringing this up, as well as recognizing where some cheating may exist.

    Let's remember one key thing here....the methods that we know exist, speedhack linearly.

    Well, SPi doesn't scale linearly, it's inversely proportional. You can't linearly generalize: 100MHz increase is equal to a given time decrease. However, you can say this: MHz * time ~= X, where X is constant for any given setup.

    For a high speed, VERY well tweaked 975X + Conroe sytem, X is equal to about 50500.
    Remember this.

    Let's take a look at some top SPI 1.5 results, taken from hwbot.org and from on the forum.

    OPB - 5550 x 8.91 = 49451
    (Oct 16) here
    OPB - 5567 x 9.16 = 50994 (Oct 10) **
    Maxxxpct - 5506 x 9.33 = 51370
    Coolaler - 5525 x 9.00 = 49725 Lookie here
    TaPaKaH - 5408 x 9.36 = 50619
    OPB - 5407 x 9.39 = 50772 (Sept 24) **
    Memoryextreme Team - 5348 x 9.44 = 50485
    Hipro5 - 5376 x 9.45 = 50803
    OPB - 5329 x 9.55 = 50892 (Sept 8) **
    ojdr2001 - 5348 x 9.55 = 51073
    OPB - 5305 x 9.63 = 51087 (Sept 2) **
    KP - 5297 x 9.68 = 51275
    Hipro - 5217 x 9.72 = 50709
    TaPaKaH - 5208 x 9.78 = 50934
    zbogorgon - 5196 x 9.8 = 50920
    hipro - 5138 x 9.89 = 50815
    Kyosen - 4167 x 12.05 = 50212 Lookie here. FWIW, this is THE BEST clock-for-clock time to be found...that's legit at least
    before - 5000 x 10.06 = 50300 Lookie here...look at that RAM speed!
    kyosen - 9.937 x 5086 = 50540 Lookie here

    See a trend? Known, reputable SuperPi GODS need lowish MHz, insane tweaks, and insane RAM to barely break below 50400.

    Let's now take a look at Coolaler's progression, from slowest to fastest:

    5200 x 9.72 = 50544 (July 12) here
    5300 x 9.64 = 51092 (July 17) here
    5396 x 9.485 = 51181 (July 18) here
    5409 x 9.484 = 51299 (July 19) here
    Now things begin to get funky
    5485 x 9.204 = 50484 (July 23) here
    5512 x 9.156 = 50468 (July 28) here
    Now the grand finale:
    5525 x 9.000 = 49725 (Aug 2) here

    Not a single one of those final three has outstanding FSB/RAM speed or timings, not a single one has much headroom for MHz suicide stability....and are EXCEEDINGLY fast, especially considering his tweaking skills. Something changed....something we can't see.

    Well, let's take a look at his results from above....see clock-for-clock improving over time? Then he drops the bomb: 8.906 at 5550. He also later shares all his tweaks, they're old, they don't do that much (if anything) on C2D, people have tried them. Then, if you also look back at his non-WR results, you see this gem:

    4710 x 10.344 = 48720 here
    ....which is just crazy fast, fast to the point where he probably ran it at a higher speed than what he had in the screenshot.

    Anyway, something's up with the orange and red results....they're just not legit. The green results are the best we could find....and are by known SPI legends, and have the hardware setting to backup the clock-for-clock greatness they have.

    Looking at the top 250 results between hwbot.org and Coolaler and OPB's posts, and charting them in excel....well, pictures certainly can say a thousand words.



    Quick explanation: each point represents a SPI run, look at the axis to tell what each graph is graphing....the "average" line is, based on the top 250 results and their clock-for-clock performance, that is the "average expected performance line". The "ideal" line is based on "50500"....a.k.a., a VERY well-tweaked system, and what you can expect as MHz changes.

    Coolalers and OPB's results have been singled out so you can tell which are theirs. Picoo's recent run is also singled out as the new WR, and to show, that what is expected from an insanely tuned system from one of Team Japan's members.

    Some sort of explanation is due....either it's a bug, a cheat, or a tweak that does what no other tweak can do in 1M: improve times by more than a few hundreths of a second.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Germany, near Stuttgart
    Posts
    1,076
    edit...
    Last edited by 2fink; 12-13-2006 at 12:59 PM.
    E2160 @ 360x9, max 390x9 watercooled
    GA-P35-DS3
    Cellshock D9GMH @ 545mhz cl5-5-5-5-15
    Palit 7300gt 500/1000 @ 780/1600 watercooled

  3. #3
    The Blue Dolphin
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,816
    I see no difference big enough to conclude something is fishy. OPB is a very good tweaker and he could have given his special tweak(s) to Coolaler.

    And yes, cheating is possible, but I trust OPB and Coolaler before I see any real prove, which nobody can provide.

    It's a matter of trust.
    Blue Dolphin Reviews & Guides

    Blue Reviews:
    Gigabyte G-Power PRO CPU cooler
    Vantec Nexstar 3.5" external HDD enclosure
    Gigabyte Poseidon 310 case


    Blue Guides:
    Fixing a GFX BIOS checksum yourself


    98% of the internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that isn't an emo bastard, copy and paste this into your sig.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    448
    Well, everything seems hypothetical. IDK what to think.

  5. #5
    Aussie God
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    4,596
    I've spoken about tweaks with coolaler..

    - Btw, my results are with lower clocks, but according to ya system, I hit around 49800-50000, does that make me a cheater?
    Competition ranking;
    2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
    2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
    2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
    2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)

    Spectating;
    2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!


  6. #6
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by 2fink
    sry, but why get all well respected overclockers flamed like this?

    i cant believe everyone is thinking opb and coolaler are cheating! when coolaler first made those records, he was the absolute leader.. no one could beat his times sub 10seconds.. why should he cheat?
    he could do a run @ 5ghz (9,8sec) and get the wr, or he could tweak the system as much as possible to show what is possible with the systems we own and make 9sec flat

    the tweaks they use may be unfair, because no one else knows them, but team japan also used some tweaks like copying big files on the hdd...
    What flame, what cheat accusation ?




    All Vapor is saying is that the graphs show that their results are from the norm and therefore whether they are valid ?

    We should not put a humanistic spin on things to try and validify things. The pure results speak for themselves.

    Regards

    Andy

  7. #7
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,714
    I'm pretty sceptic about this thread. Once again, the people who don't reach great times start to complain about how impossible it is to have such low spi times.

    BUT on the other hand, you have prouven a point by showing us the graphs. Before you make your final conclusion, I'd like to hear what the legends have to tell about this
    Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    East Coast USA
    Posts
    768
    sorry, but I need more than your equation to believe that coolar and OPB have done something Malicious, do they know something you don't, maybe. Not really sure this is the approiate way to go about questioning their results either.

  9. #9
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    SiliCORN Valley
    Posts
    5,543
    i am not even gunna get into this pi$$ing contest
    "These are the rules. Everybody fights, nobody quits. If you don't do your job I'll kill you myself.
    Welcome to the Roughnecks"

    "Anytime you think I'm being too rough, anytime you think I'm being too tough, anytime you miss-your-mommy, QUIT!
    You sign your 1248, you get your gear, and you take a stroll down washout lane. Do you get me?"

    Heat Ebay Feedback

  10. #10
    X.I.P
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,964
    if i can run at that speed, i can easy to break their 32M time. believe or not. i have much better tweak XD

  11. #11
    Slovenian OC Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,089
    this is a pic of all OPBs Spi sub 10s runs, all done on 975 mobo, with 1:1 3-3-3- RAM settings
    some of top runs aren't that far appart

    OC-Lab.si!!

  12. #12
    The Blue Dolphin
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,816
    Quote Originally Posted by zakelwe
    What flame, what cheat accusation ?


    ************************

    All Vapor is saying is that the graphs show that their results are from the norm and therefore whether they are valid ?

    We should not put a humanistic spin on things to try and validify things. The pure results speak for themselves.

    Regards

    Andy
    He says they're not legit, in his post. If that isn't an accusation of cheating I don't know what is.
    Blue Dolphin Reviews & Guides

    Blue Reviews:
    Gigabyte G-Power PRO CPU cooler
    Vantec Nexstar 3.5" external HDD enclosure
    Gigabyte Poseidon 310 case


    Blue Guides:
    Fixing a GFX BIOS checksum yourself


    98% of the internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that isn't an emo bastard, copy and paste this into your sig.

  13. #13
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    4,594
    woah, boys. this is not about cheating. It's about a new tweak it seems Vapor would like shared with all. BUt:

    Quote Originally Posted by Coolaler
    Speical Thanks to my Teammate,OPB's Opinion MSR for editor set
    Quote Originally Posted by OnePageBook
    mate,
    For the tweak about explorer.exe shut down is not that nessary for getting faster result; on the other hand, set the real time for 1m is more than anything else!! that my two cents
    Quote Originally Posted by Coolaler
    yes!OPB r right
    if u off explore,that will be slower
    Quote Originally Posted by cpulloverclock
    Sorry Coolaler but something is weird in your 9.000s run

    Here is your 9.156s score

    Between the loop 19 and 20 there is a difference of 0.406s (normal)
    Anyway, so, cpulloverclock concedes that result is valid, but still questions. After a PM session he gives up. Why? We wanna know.

    Have fun!

  14. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    573
    So told us thit tweak(s) guys!


    Quote Originally Posted by AndreYang View Post
    wtf..your cpu is better.

  15. #15
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,714
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor
    in light of TaPaKaH's recent admittance of faking everything
    Where does he say that, in his own words ?

    If it's indeed all fake, hwbot will take further actions and delete his scores.
    Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

  16. #16
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by alexio
    He says they're not legit, in his post. If that isn't an accusation of cheating I don't know what is.
    No, he is saying they are not valid, ie they are not the norm and therefore need further explanation. This has also been raised here


    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=125972

    this just adds graphs to show it plainly.

    How do you explain those graphs .. a tweak ? Even the Japanese cannot get down to that level and they are the masters of SuperPi.

    Regards
    Andy

  17. #17
    SSD faster than your HDD
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Posts
    2,627
    Quote Originally Posted by massman
    Where does he say that, in his own words ?
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=126554

  18. #18
    Slovenian OC Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by massman
    Where does he say that, in his own words ?

    If it's indeed all fake, hwbot will take further actions and delete his scores.
    probably over PM, he is Banned on XS
    OC-Lab.si!!

  19. #19
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Words mean things.

    Among the definitions of legitimate: 1) not spurious or unjustified; genuine and 2) in accordance with the laws of reasoning; logically inferable; logical

    Does this mean cheating? No. Does it leave out cheating? No.

    I'm just saying they're not legitimate.

    I have listed my three suspected causes for why some of their results are, statistically, way out of the norm. To the point where not a single other person can, legitimately replicate or nearly replicate these results

    These results need an explanation. Can anyone prove the legitimacy of the suspected results?

    EDIT: TaPaKaH admitted the cheating here: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...24#post1893424
    Last edited by Vapor; 12-13-2006 at 01:03 PM.

  20. #20
    Bulletproof
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Shun low, K?
    Posts
    2,553
    Quote Originally Posted by cadaveca
    woah, boys. this is not about cheating. It's about a new tweak it seems Vapor would like shared with all. BUt:







    Anyway, so, cpulloverclock concedes that result is valid, but still questions. After a PM session he gives up. Why? We wanna know.

    Have fun!

    There has been discussion regarding the Stripped down XP, priority RT, and killing explorer tweaks. From what I understood, those all give very very very minor performance boosts. We are talking multiple hundred mhz discrepancies, as I understand it.

    Most glaring even besides the stark difference between these benchies and other Pi'ers benches is the difference between these benchies and the same user's previous benchies. Quite suddenly these benchers shave seconds off their times whereas the visible changes in their rigs don't demonstrate any reason why that should happen.
    Last edited by Lithan; 12-13-2006 at 01:06 PM.
    Only the stupidest humans believe that the dogma of relative filth is a defense.

  21. #21
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    4,594
    Quote Originally Posted by massman
    Where does he say that, in his own words ?

    If it's indeed all fake, hwbot will take further actions and delete his scores.
    here ya go:
    Quote Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
    Can you please ban me?

    Reasons:
    I`m a big faker
    none of my results are true
    I have never used any of xtreme cooling (DI/LN2)
    sitting @ my PII-233 box
    I hate XS
    the member they talk about here http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=117280&page=3 is me

    ATM I report that` I`m not mad at someone, not drunk, wasn`t hit on the street by the brick

    That`s just my will.
    I do not want to be an XS member anymore...

    Thanks
    Sam

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&highlight=ban



    BTW...TaPaKaH = HaKa PaT = Hacker Pat.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    715
    Quote Originally Posted by M.Beier
    I've spoken about tweaks with coolaler..

    - Btw, my results are with lower clocks, but according to ya system, I hit around 49800-50000, does that make me a cheater?
    Lower clocks makes that number lower, right ? Or is it linear @whatever clocks ?

    Something to see this easy is to make at low speeds so everyone can make the tests.

    @3500mhz I got 14,297secs with fat body @583 4-3-2-1 ( 2x512 ) which gaves me a nice ~50000 points. I know that it could be a bit better, not too much tho.

    OPB made a run of 14,15secs @3,5ghz with 440 3-3-3 ram ( 2x1gb )

    That made me think of it... Also one user which gets 14,25secs with an gigabyte 965p and ram similar to OPB.

    What do you say ?
    Asus P5K Premium//Intel E6600@3,6ghz//Corsair PC6400C3@500 4-4-4-12 2,2v//8800GTS G92//Audigy 2 ZS//SeaSonic M12 700W & LianLi V2000B

  23. #23
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    4,594
    Quote Originally Posted by Lithan
    There has been discussion regarding the Stripped down XP, priority RT, and killing explorer tweaks. From what I understood, those all give very very very minor performance boosts. We are talking multiple second discrepancies, as I understand it.
    hey man, when i posted 8 second spi times i got grilled too. i thought result was legit, and can still to this day replicate it(hardware conflict with RAID drive without it's partner throws off hardware timer) on 3ghz Opty 148.


    I found out why my result is borked, i wanna hear how this was done too. Don't get me wrong, I popped up relevant info because i have been following this for a while. Notice how my HWBOT has no SPI runs? i don't bother becasue those scores seem wrong to me too, and noone says nothing.

  24. #24
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    4,678
    OPB abnd Coolaler are well respected overclockers. They are probably aware of tweaks that we arent. One tweak that seems to affect SPI times is msconfig's maxmem tweak. There has been many different opinion on what it should be. What if OPB and Coolaler have found the sweet spot? Also, I beleive after 2 runs of SPI you get a faster time (something to do with the files or so). Those are only a few. It could very well be a bug, but it will take a confession from them both for me to beleive that they cheated. No one else will convince me.
    "Victory is always possible for the person who refuses to stop fighting"

    clicks to save kids

  25. #25
    Slovenian OC Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by PallMall
    the only thing i can think about explaining OPB run is the systems stability at that point.

    I think everyone can produce the same output ,

    bench at max cpu speed, let it error, bench again little less, bench again at max cpu speed, again less.

    There should be noticable changes no ?
    the only thing i came accross is you Spi time is way longer, i had at ~4000GHz C2D spi 1m ~22s, never noticed insanelly fast time due to instability
    OC-Lab.si!!

Page 1 of 22 123411 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •