Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: The New Lord of The Single-Core, Intel Conroe-L 2.8G 1MB performance discovers

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,320

    The New Lord of The Single-Core, Intel Conroe-L 2.8G 1MB performance discovers

    Since Intel launched their Core 2 Duo new generation processors, did get
    great recommend in mid-range and high-end market, build up with brake
    through performance and 65nm tech.

    But in the mainstream and entry level side, Intel still use old P4 architecture
    to beat AMD K8 series, they also prepare to launch the single core Conroe-L
    for new product lines.

    In the recent days, we already saw few Conroe-L test, like single core 2.4G
    512k version test exposure.

    Now I also got 2 Conroe-L CPU, they are 2.8G 1MB and 2.4G 512K version. I
    just teal some free time in these 2 days to try some Conroe-L 2.8G
    performance and overclock result.

    The back of the CPU:
    Up left side is Conroe-L 2.8G 1MB, down right side is E6300 1.86G 2MB.





    2 of my different 975X boards can not support Conroe-L, maybe have to wait
    a new BIOS to fix, ASUS announced their P5B new BIOS last week to support
    Conroe-L, and my MSI P965 Platinum also can run Conroe-L smoothly.




    Testing platform setup:
    CPU:Intel Conroe-L 2.8G 1MB
    MB: MSI P965 Platinum
    DRAM:CORSAIR Dominator TWIN2X2048-8888C4DF
    VGA:ELSA GLADIAC 790GS 256B3 2DT
    HD:Seagate 7200.7 80GB
    POWER:Corsair HX620W Modular Power Supply
    Cooler:TT Sonic Tower





    200X14=>2.8G,DDRII 800 CL3 3-3-9
    EVERST detail performance

























    Super PI and CPU MARK99,
    Take a reference test number: Conroe-L 2.4G 512K is about 31 seconds.









    With no overclock 7900GS VGA
    3DMARK2003





    3DMARK2005





    The default test of Conroe-L test got great numbers indeed, 1MB version
    seems will become the standard version, 512k version might define as Celeron
    segment. But no matter Single-Core or Dual-Core, the performance all be
    great with new architecture.


    The overclocking test will coming soon!!

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    494
    Can't wait for that!!! What's the price on this bad boy?

    200fsb = goodness! Look at that multi!!!

    thanks for the screenie!
    Last edited by FLMJIGGY; 11-08-2006 at 09:30 AM.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,320
    Overclocked performance:
    CPU 247X12=>3467Mhz
    DRAM DDRII 811 CL3 3-3-9

    EVEREST

























    Super PI and CPU MARK99





    PCMARK2005





    7900GS

    3DMARK2003





    3DMARK2005





    The performance did have great enhance after overclock,
    because it’s Single-Core, so the temp. is lower the Dual-Core processors.

    Take a break and wait for further extreme testing.


  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    494
    I was going to ask you that too. What temps were like.

    Keep going. Looking good.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    296
    That looks like it could be a real economy overclocker, almost 100% allready. I feel like dual core is essential but this is perfect for anyone who just wants to play todays games only.

    Ive never seen a HSF on ramsticks before, totally cool

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    122
    Very interesting.

    Also I see in your picture the Corsair power supply, what do you think to it?
    SOB Crunchers.
    E6300 & DS3 @ 487 X 7 3409 mhz 1.4125V Ninja
    805D & P5WD2 Premium @ 194 X 20 3885 mhz 1.40V WC
    P4 3.2 & P4C800E Dlx @ 239 X 16 3824 mhz 1.40V XP120


  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    494
    That Corsair is a tremendous power

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    230
    nice.. but i wonder.. if i get with my venice 3500 @ 2750mhz and the same videocard on stock clock speeds 7600 points on 3dmark05.. it means mine is better @ the same clock speed?
    can that be?
    2500K @ 5ghz 1.344V + TRUE 120 Black
    ASUS P8P67 Pro Rev 3.1
    Micron 4GB x 2 1333mhz CL8
    Gigabyte GTX 470 SLI + Zalman VF3000
    Crucial M4 128gb SSD +
    2x Samsung 103SJ, 1x Hitachi 2TB 7K3000
    Antec High Current Gamer 900W
    Lancool PC-K62WB

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    494
    no way. No amd can do 19 on super PI...

    If a 6300 goes for 175 US then this has got to be very close to 120ish. That would be a great price.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,320
    Quote Originally Posted by PFOUR
    Very interesting.

    Also I see in your picture the Corsair power supply, what do you think to it?

    Best power supply I have used
    It is very quiet, efficient and the modular
    cables are very flexible.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Brasil
    Posts
    69
    Seems nice, but I think it's not appropriate to test a budget CPU with a 400 dollar RAM kit... Kinda breaks the semantics hehe

  12. #12
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    650
    14x multipler is pretty high....lol.

    I wonder what the max CPU frequency of this chip will be?

    I wonder if that high multiplier and the low FSB will limit OCs more relative to the lower multiplier C2D dual coresthat still have plenty of room to push the FSB?

    I'm still interested in that 1 MB version. I wonder when they will be released in the US for retail purchase?

    P.S. I hope you can get your hands on a e4300 allendale soon too. That may be ending up being "the" budget dual core OC'er.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    494
    This thing doesn't seem to be getting much interest but depending on the price it may well be worth it for a cheapie gaming rig.

    I'm waiting for the 4300 me-self.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    650
    Quote Originally Posted by FLMJIGGY
    This thing doesn't seem to be getting much interest but depending on the price it may well be worth it for a cheapie gaming rig.

    I'm waiting for the 4300 me-self.
    It really needs to cheap considering it wasn't too long ago I was seeing new retail 3700 San Diegos for $82.

    Now the e4300 is the one I'm keeping my eyes peeled for.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,320
    Testing platform setup:
    CPU:Intel Conroe-L 2.8G 1MB
    MB: MSI P965 Platinum
    DRAM:CORSAIR Dominator TWIN2X2048-8888C4DF
    VGA:Nvidia GeForce 8800GTX
    HD:Seagate 7200.7 80GB
    POWER:Corsair HX620W Modular Power Supply
    Cooler:TT Sonic Tower

    Keep go on with limited testing.
    CPU 243X14=>3411Mhz
    DRAM DDRII 811 CL3 3-3-9

    Super PI 32M





    Upgrade the VGA to 8800GTX with default setup testing:

    3DMARK2003




    3DMARK2005




    3DMARK2006




    Keep the best in the last, the limited of this Conroe-L.
    So far the 65nm Dual Core Conroe overclock limited is about 3.5G to 4GHz
    due to the different produced week and quality.





    When Conroe-L coming out, I think the frequency won’t be that high, might
    be under 2GHz for Intel’s entry product segment, Conroe-L have great
    availability with overclock, the temp. is also lower then Dual Core version, so
    I think the overclock range is also about 3~4 GHz!

    This time the test with many pictures, because the performance is great
    when in the high overclock frequency. Believe or not, Conroe-L will push the
    single Core processors into a better generation, let’s wait and see!

    Announced some coming up test from Windwithme here!
    Nvidia GeForce 8800GTX



    DFI INFINITY CFX3200-M2/G



    CORSAIR Dominator TWIN2X2048-8888C4DF



    MSI 975X Platinum PowerUp Edition

  16. #16
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    650
    With only a low FSB needed I think this would be a good CPU for 945 mobos and budget DDR2 memory.

    Thanks for the update windwithme. Now can you get a e4300

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Philippines ^_^
    Posts
    1,618
    in some news.. iuntel will discontinue this proc..
    Asus P5W64 WS Professional , DFI Infinity 965P-S (testing)
    X6800 , E6750 es
    Micron Fatbodies , Micron D9gkx oem, Crucial 8000, Crucial Tracer 8500 (incomming)
    Ati FireGL V5100, Elsa FireGL V3100
    water cooling setup (EK 775 cpu block, swiftech NB Block, Swiftech pump, BI dual pass dual 120mm)
    Silverstone OP650
    raptors, baracuda

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Gotham City, Sweden
    Posts
    367
    Could you please see how it undervolts? What's the lowest Vcore that it will POST?

    Thanks.
    AMD Phenom II 940BE | DFI LP DK790B-M2RS | Echo audio Layla 3G | 8GB Corsair C5 PC6400 | Sapphire HD3870 with HR-03+ | Genelec 8030A | Samsung 244T | Antec P182 gun metal | Thermal right Ultra120 | UPS: APC BACK-UPS RS 1500VA | Windows Vista Ultimate 64 | DAW: Ableton/Sonar | WAN: 100/10Mbit/s | OS on: WD Velocioraptor Storage: Rocket Raid 2300 PCI-E + 4*400GB Samsung T133 @Raid5. Firewall: Tyan Tomcat 945GM | Core Duo T2600 | 2*512MB ram | Nexus PM PSM-5000 | Picu PSU.


    "People who enjoy waving flags
    don't deserve to have one".

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    estonia , tallinn
    Posts
    132
    what is the msi p965 platnium max fsb ?

  20. #20
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    494
    YEa, shame these were cancelled... The dualies have much lower multis... hopefully they're 150 and under.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    650
    Quote Originally Posted by FLMJIGGY
    YEa, shame these were cancelled... The dualies have much lower multis... hopefully they're 150 and under.
    Well to me I thought the high multi on this was kind of a waste. I mean its already been proven that C2D mobos can deliver max CPU clocks with far lower multis as long as the memory is up to par.

    If they made this say 9x multi and even cheaper I think it could have worked.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •