Page 1 of 8 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 180

Thread: X1950XTX beats the 8800GTS @ 2560x1600 4xAA

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ultra Clean Room
    Posts
    323

    X1950XTX beats the 8800GTS @ 2560x1600 4xAA

    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowmage
    http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2870&p=25

    Anandtech says the 8800GTS ties with the single X1950XTX in Battlefield 2 at 2560x1600 4xAA. The 8800GTS does win at lower resolutions though.

    and the X1950Crossfire >> 8800GTX SLI




    Turn off the AA ,

    8800GTX SLI >> X1950CF




    Anandtech has the X1950XTX beating the 8800GTS in FEAR by quite a large margin at 2560x1600 4xAA: 24 vs 17fps




    The X1950XTX seems to be very competitive in FEAR, even at lower resolutions.

    Anandtech also has the X1950XTX beating the 8800GTS in B&W.





    Quote Originally Posted by PConline
    NVIDIA reveals the card not to be able in The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion opens HDR+AA, thus we use HDR+Normal the detail analysis.
    http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...898744_27.html

    8800GTX can't open HDR + AA in oblivion


    the X1950XTX beats the 8800GTS @ 2048x1536 4aa 16af with HDR

    both the X1950XTX and the 8800GTS has a memory bandwith of 64GB/s
    (256bit 1GHz GDDR4 = 320bit 800MHz GDDR3)

    this gen beats next gen













    source

    http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/graph...898744_26.html











    Last edited by milkcafe; 11-09-2006 at 08:14 AM. Reason: .

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    844
    maybe some driver updates? haha..
    -Cpu:Opteron 170 LCBQE 0722RPBW(2.87ghz @ 1.300v)
    (retired)Opteron 146 (939) CAB2E 0540
    -Heatsink: Thermalright XP-90
    -Fan:120mm Yate Loon 1650 RPM @ 12V, 70.5 CFM, 33dB
    -Motherboard: DFI Lanparty nF4 UT Ultra-D
    -Ram: Mushkin High Performance blue, 2gigs(2X1gig kit) PC3200 991434
    -Hard drive: Seagate 400GB Barracuda SATA HD 7200.10(AS noisey model)
    -Video card: evga 6800GS @520/1170
    -Case: P180
    -PSU:Enermax 535Watt EG565P-VE FMA (24P)

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    1,331
    and the XTX takes the GTS in Q4 across the board when AA is enabled.

  4. #4
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    ok, it beats the GTS in uber high settings. It still gets beat down by the GTX
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    israel
    Posts
    133
    wow the 8800gtx is good card i whant to see th 8800gx2
    hahahahaha

  6. #6
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    How come every year EVERY year every time a new card comes out you guys become Review junkies...the reviews are good to get a jist of performance...but the GTS is VERY underclocked on both mem and core while the XTX is maxxed out especialy with driver limitations.

    The XTX for $399 is a good card for ATi fans...but it can't touch a well oced GTS.

    Perkam

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,696
    wow, the gap between the gts and gtx is HUGE!!
    Workstation:
    3960X | 32GB G.Skill 2133 | Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    3*EVGA GTX580 HC2 3GB | 3*Dell U3011
    4*Crucial M4 256GB R0 | 6*3TB WD Green R6
    Areca 1680ix-24 + 4GB | 2*Pioneer BDR-205 | Enermax Plat 1500W
    Internal W/C | PC-P80 | G19 | G700 | G27
    Destop Audio:
    Squeezebox Duet | Beresford TC-7520 Caiman modded | NAD M3 | MA RX8 | HD650 | ATH-ES7
    Man Cave:
    PT-AT5000E | TXP65VT30 | PR-SC5509 | PA-MC5500 | MA GX300*2, GXFX*4, GXC350 | 2*BK Monolith+
    Gaming on the go:
    Alienware M18x
    i7 2920XM | 16GB DDR3 1600
    2*6990 | WLED 1080P
    2*Crucial M4 256GB | BD-RW
    BT 375 | Intel 6300 | 330W PSU

    2011 Audi R8 V10 Ibis White ABT Tuned - 600HP

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    295
    we'll have to wait and see some OCied results on the GTS and then compare
    i7 920, EX58-UD5, 6GB Corsair 1600Mhz, 8344ELP + 4x146GB SAS, 2x640GB, 27" DELL, 4870, P182 liquid cooled, Antec Quattro 1kW, X-Fi Prelude + Z5500, Razer Mamba, G15

  9. #9
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    3,656
    Quote Originally Posted by 3NZ0
    wow, the gap between the gts and gtx is HUGE!!
    It should be. Not like the 7900GT/GTX fiasko. If u pay premium money for a vga u must get something more than just higher clocks...
    Project ZEUS II

    Asus Rampage II Extreme
    Intel I7 920 D0 3930A @ 4.50GHz (21 X 214mhz)
    3 x 2GB G.Skill Trident 1600 @ 1716MHz (6-8-6-20-1N)
    2 x Asus HD 6870 CrossFire @ 1000/1100MHz
    OCZ Vertex 2 60GB | Intel X25-M 120GB | WD Velociraptor 150GB | Seagate FreeAgent XTreme 1.5TB esata
    Asus Xonar DX | Logitech Z-5500 | LG W2600HP 26" S-IPS LCD

    Watercooling setup:
    1st loop -> Radiator: 2 x ThermoChill PA120.3 | Pump: Laing DDC-3.25 with Alphacool HF 38 top | CPU: Swiftech Apogee XT | Chipset: Swiftech MCW-NBMAX | Tubing: Masterkleer 1/2" UV
    2nd loop -> Radiator: ThermoChill PA120.3 | Pump: Laing DDC-3.2 with Alphacool HF 38 top | GPU: 2 x EK FC-6870 | Tubing: Masterkleer 1/2" UV


    Assembled in Mountain Mods Ascension Trinity
    Powered by Corsair Professional Series Gold AX1200

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by 3NZ0
    wow, the gap between the gts and gtx is HUGE!!
    The gap definately concerns me.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    1,136
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam
    How come every year EVERY year every time a new card comes out you guys become Review junkies...the reviews are good to get a jist of performance...but the GTS is VERY underclocked on both mem and core while the XTX is maxxed out especialy with driver limitations.

    The XTX for $399 is a good card for ATi fans...but it can't touch a well oced GTS.

    Perkam
    amen.

    Gigabyte x58 UD5 / core i7 920 @ 3.8 / 6G ddr3 / 100G Patriot Inferno + 500G WD / gtx470 SLI watercooled / x-fi / 1KW enermax / 5760x1080 surround

    Gigabyte z68x-ud3-b3 / core i5 2400 @ 3.6 / 8G ddr3 / 120G Intel 510 + 120G Adata S599 + 2x 1T WD blue / Zotac gt430 / x-fi / 500w ocz / 1920x1200
    DFI pro875B / pressy 2.8 / 2g corsair xms pro / 6800gt agp / 150g raptor x / 500w ultra x-connect / lots of UV lighting / smiles
    MSI K7N2 Delta-L / Athlon xp2600+ / 1G ocz platinum / chaintech TNT2 / 2x Diamond Monster 3D II SLI / Audigy / more smiles

  12. #12
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,693
    ofc the gap is huge, they diffrence between em is more then just clocks.

    and about the FPS of the X1950XTX and 8800GTS il wait for more reviews to see if they show the same results.
    Dito about dirvers, dunno what drivers they used could very wel be that next drivers show a considereble FPS gain.
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    Groucho Marx



    i know my grammar sux so stop hitting me

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...898744_27.html

    The X1950XTX gets STOMPED by the GTS in oblivion...
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by Starscream
    ofc the gap is huge, they diffrence between em is more then just clocks.
    Exactly, looks like the stream processor quantity difference is key, with modern titles

  15. #15
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by 3NZ0
    wow, the gap between the gts and gtx is HUGE!!
    I don't know, seems very familiar to the 7800GT and 7800GTX scores
    http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2496&p=3
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  16. #16
    THE ORIGINAL OC JEDI
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Field of Battle
    Posts
    8,973
    the 8800GTX be SPANKIN'

  17. #17
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    3,656
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step
    I don't know, seems very familiar to the 7800GT and 7800GTX scores
    http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2496&p=3
    Exactly. That's the way it was and should be...
    Project ZEUS II

    Asus Rampage II Extreme
    Intel I7 920 D0 3930A @ 4.50GHz (21 X 214mhz)
    3 x 2GB G.Skill Trident 1600 @ 1716MHz (6-8-6-20-1N)
    2 x Asus HD 6870 CrossFire @ 1000/1100MHz
    OCZ Vertex 2 60GB | Intel X25-M 120GB | WD Velociraptor 150GB | Seagate FreeAgent XTreme 1.5TB esata
    Asus Xonar DX | Logitech Z-5500 | LG W2600HP 26" S-IPS LCD

    Watercooling setup:
    1st loop -> Radiator: 2 x ThermoChill PA120.3 | Pump: Laing DDC-3.25 with Alphacool HF 38 top | CPU: Swiftech Apogee XT | Chipset: Swiftech MCW-NBMAX | Tubing: Masterkleer 1/2" UV
    2nd loop -> Radiator: ThermoChill PA120.3 | Pump: Laing DDC-3.2 with Alphacool HF 38 top | GPU: 2 x EK FC-6870 | Tubing: Masterkleer 1/2" UV


    Assembled in Mountain Mods Ascension Trinity
    Powered by Corsair Professional Series Gold AX1200

  18. #18
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Quote Originally Posted by JoeBar
    Exactly. That's the way it was and should be...
    It'll be more like 7900GT and 7900GTX but you can never be sure cos of arch diff.

    Just wait for reviewers to start ocing the beasts...platforms will fall, WRs will break, and games will beg for mercy.

    Perkam
    Last edited by perkam; 11-07-2006 at 11:58 AM.

  19. #19
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    4,151
    there are some weird resutls in that review, i'll wait for a couple more until i make my mind

  20. #20
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    1,990
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam
    How come every year EVERY year every time a new card comes out you guys become Review junkies...the reviews are good to get a jist of performance...but the GTS is VERY underclocked on both mem and core while the XTX is maxxed out especialy with driver limitations.

    The XTX for $399 is a good card for ATi fans...but it can't touch a well oced GTS.

    Perkam
    qft
    Heatware: 50-0-0
    Quote Originally Posted by Charile
    I believe that GWB, who may NOT be the best overclocking CPU in the tray...
    Quote Originally Posted by -thc-(cZ) View Post
    oh c'mon, maxxx, kick that cat of that monitor and have it poop for you

  21. #21
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    3,656
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam
    It'll be more like 7900GT and 7900GTX.

    Just wait for reviewers to start ocing the beasts...platforms will fall, WRs will break, and games will beg for mercy.

    Perkam
    I don't think that the gap will be as close, cause now (as with 7800 series, there are diff specs), but i may be wrong. Only time will tell though and the good thing for us, is that it won't be long...
    Project ZEUS II

    Asus Rampage II Extreme
    Intel I7 920 D0 3930A @ 4.50GHz (21 X 214mhz)
    3 x 2GB G.Skill Trident 1600 @ 1716MHz (6-8-6-20-1N)
    2 x Asus HD 6870 CrossFire @ 1000/1100MHz
    OCZ Vertex 2 60GB | Intel X25-M 120GB | WD Velociraptor 150GB | Seagate FreeAgent XTreme 1.5TB esata
    Asus Xonar DX | Logitech Z-5500 | LG W2600HP 26" S-IPS LCD

    Watercooling setup:
    1st loop -> Radiator: 2 x ThermoChill PA120.3 | Pump: Laing DDC-3.25 with Alphacool HF 38 top | CPU: Swiftech Apogee XT | Chipset: Swiftech MCW-NBMAX | Tubing: Masterkleer 1/2" UV
    2nd loop -> Radiator: ThermoChill PA120.3 | Pump: Laing DDC-3.2 with Alphacool HF 38 top | GPU: 2 x EK FC-6870 | Tubing: Masterkleer 1/2" UV


    Assembled in Mountain Mods Ascension Trinity
    Powered by Corsair Professional Series Gold AX1200

  22. #22
    Muslim Overclocker
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,786
    Actually I am not too worried at how the x1950xt keeps pace with the GTS. That was maybe what nvidia had in mind in the first place. But those people saying that the x1950xt is already at max clocks.. The memory on those cards has a lot of potential.

    But the thing that really scares me here is how the 8800GTX runs Serious Sam 2 at 2048x1536 just fine at 127FPS. But you enable 4xAA and 16xAF and it goes down to 38.1FPS????????? A 70% performance penalty is way way too much for a card of this caliber. Even the 8800GTS itself looses almost that much performance as well. X1950XT manages to keep losses around 55%.

    It could be Nvidia's new AA and new Angle Independent filtering at work. But I sure hope this can be fixed with better drivers.

    My watercooling experience

    Water
    Scythe Gentle Typhoons 120mm 1850RPM
    Thermochill PA120.3 Radiator
    Enzotech Sapphire Rev.A CPU Block
    Laing DDC 3.2
    XSPC Dual Pump Reservoir
    Primochill Pro LRT Red 1/2"
    Bitspower fittings + water temp sensor

    Rig
    E8400 | 4GB HyperX PC8500 | Corsair HX620W | ATI HD4870 512MB


    I see what I see, and you see what you see. I can't make you see what I see, but I can tell you what I see is not what you see. Truth is, we see what we want to see, and what we want to see is what those around us see. And what we don't see is... well, conspiracies.



  23. #23
    Xtreme 3D Mark Team Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Juneau Alaska
    Posts
    7,607
    wow, that was unexpected.

    the GTS in its specs should be a far superior card to even the X1950 XTX... its abit surprising to see how small the gap in those two cards really is.

    maybe ATI just has a really smart design focusing on shader power, and not just having the most pipelines.




    "The command and conquer model," said the EA CEO, "doesn't work. If you think you're going to buy a developer and put your name on the label... you're making a profound mistake."

  24. #24
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ultra Clean Room
    Posts
    323
    I think the 2.93GHz X6800 dont have enough CPU power for the 8800GTS

    run on a Core 2 Quad QX6700 @ 4.2G or Yorkfield 3.73G CPU

    8800GTS maybe beat X1950XTX in any benchmark & games

  25. #25
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,838
    some IQ comparisons are in order i assume?
    Last edited by grimREEFER; 11-07-2006 at 12:19 PM.
    DFI P965-S/core 2 quad q6600@3.2ghz/4gb gskill ddr2 @ 800mhz cas 4/xfx gtx 260/ silverstone op650/thermaltake xaser 3 case/razer lachesis

Page 1 of 8 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •