Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 156

Thread: Prescott vs AMD64

  1. #51
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    978
    I think the 3000+@ 2.4hz would get owned!

  2. #52
    Xtreme AMD Fanboy
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Salem / Corvallis, OR
    Posts
    979
    Originally posted by Signal0101
    Video Conversion - ?
    Gaming - ?
    3D Mark 2001 - ?
    3D Mark 2003 - ?
    SuperPi - ?
    Depends on app, more than likely Intel
    Athlon 64
    Athlon 64
    Athlon 64 (unless you have an EE)
    Athlon 64

    Intel is the preferred chip for rendering, encoding, and other media apps.

    Proud Founder of Redline 3D

  3. #53
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    80
    Originally posted by Hallowed
    Depends on app, more than likely Intel
    Athlon 64
    Athlon 64
    Athlon 64 (unless you have an EE)
    Athlon 64

    Intel is the preferred chip for rendering, encoding, and other media apps.
    Thanks. Exactly what I was looking for.

  4. #54
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    New-Brunswick, Canada
    Posts
    3,464
    Originally posted by JCviggen
    Dude...you are so wrong.

    its <5%


    and the only screenshot i have seen of FUGGER with a 2.8 at 4+ was in a R507 prom
    Im probably wrong on 40%. But its more then 5%!!!!

    Who buy theyre more expensive chips? gamers or OCers.

    BTW: I was thinking it was on stock cooler, i was like 99% sure.

  5. #55
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Belgium / Denmark / Russia
    Posts
    2,254
    Originally posted by skate2snow
    Im probably wrong on 40%. But its more then 5%!!!!

    Who buy theyre more expensive chips? gamers or OCers.

    BTW: I was thinking it was on stock cooler, i was like 99% sure.

    lets see.... Intel had something like 9 billion revenue last quarter, and i believe 2.2 billion net profit.
    Any idea how many chips that are...? 99% of them will never run past its stock speed...a big portion are server and mobile chips too...even if you count only desktop chips...its a very very small impact on Intel's total
    This is an estimated guess but i dont think "we" account for more than 1%

  6. #56
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    happy place
    Posts
    2,337
    Originally posted by Signal0101

    Video Conversion - ?
    Gaming - ?
    3D Mark 2001 - ?
    3D Mark 2003 - ?
    SuperPi - ?
    Video conversion- P4, P4e, P4ee
    gaming- Athlon, A64
    3dmark2001- A64
    3dmark03- P4EE
    SuperPI- A64


    The Pentium4 is faster in video conversion
    http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/2004...escott-14.html

    DV(1.2gb) to Mpeg m-2(DVD)
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...t-tests_9.html

    "Since NetBurst architecture is very efficient for streaming data processing, Pentium 4 processors feel at home in audio and video content encoding applications."
    --===== proud owner of new razor tarantula gaming keyboard =====--

  7. #57
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    177
    well for a comparison my 3400+ does 20717 on stock w/ 9800 xt gpu stock.

  8. #58
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    177
    i am at a disadvantage atm..cant overclock at all. i have superior cooling (mk2 but i cant oc) its winter here and my room is overheated. the apt management has the heaters on like crazy and its hot enough to grow palm trees. prommy powers up but shuts off due to high ambient temp. running stock is my only option til it gets warmer outside and the heaters shut off.

  9. #59
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Belgium / Denmark / Russia
    Posts
    2,254
    Mach II is designed to handle up to +30C ambient... i cant imagine its running thÃ:banana:t hot... could you tell me any specific fault codes you get, if any? (possibly through PM as to stay on tpic here)

  10. #60
    Xtreme AMD Fanboy
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Salem / Corvallis, OR
    Posts
    979
    Originally posted by Kanavit
    Video conversion- P4, P4e, P4ee
    gaming- Athlon, A64
    3dmark2001- A64
    3dmark03- P4EE
    SuperPI- A64
    Kan, he didnt mention P4EE anywhere.

    Proud Founder of Redline 3D

  11. #61
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    177
    The P4EE ownz i am going to have one real soon

  12. #62
    Xtreme AMD Fanboy
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Salem / Corvallis, OR
    Posts
    979
    Originally posted by D/SCoNn3Ct3D
    The P4EE ownz i am going to have one real soon
    Is this before or after you 'get' a FX-51, a 3400+, and NV40?

    Oh wait, NDA.

    Proud Founder of Redline 3D

  13. #63
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,202
    Originally posted by Kanavit
    Video conversion- P4, P4e, P4ee
    gaming- Athlon, A64
    3dmark2001- A64
    3dmark03- P4EE
    SuperPI- A64


    The Pentium4 is faster in video conversion
    http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/2004...escott-14.html

    DV(1.2gb) to Mpeg m-2(DVD)
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...t-tests_9.html

    "Since NetBurst architecture is very efficient for streaming data processing, Pentium 4 processors feel at home in audio and video content encoding applications."

    oh yeah Kanavit,

    Look i just installed a 64Bit XP. Try to beat my DIVx compression score with your P4 I say AMD64 in 64-Bit OS will be at least 2x faster than P4.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	pcmark64bit.gif 
Views:	7229 
Size:	41.7 KB 
ID:	8408  

  14. #64
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    holy crap!180fps? u sure its not a bug?
    amazing...




    Originally posted by Soulburner
    I have seen 4600mhz in one already...
    yeah, ive seen one at 6.8ghz already... on air btw :P

  15. #65
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,202
    no it's not a bug. btw, MS just released XP-64Bit for download. Also VIA has 4in1 64Bit drivers including sound/raid/SATA. Promise has RAID drivers available to download.

    Drivers are rolling out gentlemen, and it's time for ATI to wake up.

  16. #66
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    you think 64bit drivers will give a performence boost?
    hmmm

    damn damn damn what is amd waiting for? where are the 939 boards/chips?

  17. #67
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    122
    isnt comparing processors in 3dmrk03 kind of pointless? As far as sales percentages go, dont forget that intels processors are only like 60% of their sales.. if that. They are actually the leading gpu manufacturer(followed by ati then nvidia), nearly as many chipsets are made by them as processors (since every processor needs a chipset of course, and a very small percentage are made by sis and other 3rd parties) not to mention their broad line of networking equipment, handheld products, software, and memory. I would say people such as macci and fugger and other front page regulars, even stretching as far as anyone with a prommy, while probably put the most income per capita towards intel products (that choose to) of any of their customers, they are a nearly incalculably small percentage of intels total income. Enthusiasts or overclockers as far as what they spend on processors, are no more than 3-4% of intels total income. We are no more than a grain of salt on a very, very large beach.
    3800x2 @ 2.4 (240x10)
    2GB XMS3200
    XFX 7900gs extreme @ 600/800

  18. #68
    Xtreme AMD Fanboy
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Salem / Corvallis, OR
    Posts
    979
    Originally posted by sKiTz0
    isnt comparing processors in 3dmrk03 kind of pointless?
    With the 3DMark score, yes.

    If you use their seperate "CPU Score" you'll find its pretty accurate.

    And in that particular bench, FX-51 / 3.4 - 3.2EE / 3400+...etc actually works as advertised.

    But none of our overclockers care to bench it. I'm sure if one did it might start the ball rolling, so to speak.

    Proud Founder of Redline 3D

  19. #69
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    177
    Originally posted by Hallowed
    Is this before or after you 'get' a FX-51, a 3400+, and NV40?

    Oh wait, NDA.
    I have had the fx-51 already and now I have the 3400+

    i got rid of the fx-51 because the sk8v had prommy issues. if this is not enough proof i can show pics of the cpu and mb and prommy for both fx and the 3400+



    i didnt have enough time to mess around with this. too busy w/ school and prommy replacement......

  20. #70
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    80
    Look i just installed a 64Bit XP. Try to beat my DIVx compression score with your P4 I say AMD64 in 64-Bit OS will be at least 2x faster than P4. [/B][/QUOTE]

    That's awesome Quad! I'm downloading win xp 64-bit as i type. Just curious though, at what settings was that screen shot taken at? ie. fsb, mult, divs, timings, etc.

  21. #71
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,202
    10x230 2-2-2-6-11-16 air cooled 24/7 settings. 3200+ / Asus K8V Deluxe, Corsair XMS3500 BH-5 2x256MB in slot 1 and 2.

  22. #72
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    80
    That's sweet dude. And where do you get the 4 in 1 64-bit drivers? I've got the K8V as well.

  23. #73
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Pensacola, FL
    Posts
    197
    Originally posted by Soulburner
    So 4.2Ghz on air isn't enough for you?

    Not when 4.2ghz can be stomped on by my A64. Sure on air that is impressive, but if the performance isnt impressive then it sucks.
    A64 3200+ @ 2.3ghz
    1gb mushkin lvl 2 blk (oh goodness)
    ATI R9600XT
    Shuttle AN50R
    Lian Li PC-75
    My Heatware


  24. #74
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    happy place
    Posts
    2,337
    Originally posted by QuadDamage
    oh yeah Kanavit,

    Look i just installed a 64Bit XP. Try to beat my DIVx compression score with your P4 I say AMD64 in 64-Bit OS will be at least 2x faster than P4.
    here's mine Quad, stock no o/c. Pcmark04 haven't updated the patch yet.

    --===== proud owner of new razor tarantula gaming keyboard =====--

  25. #75
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    Quad, that is amazing.

    Now what you need to do is run an actual Divx encode, show us your results, and have someone else run the same file on a Northwood/Prescott to compare, just to have a 2nd proof and not just PCMark.
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •