Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 79 of 79

Thread: GTL Ref Tweaking Guide

  1. #76
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    297
    Hey ryan, as far as i know clock speed limitation should largely be the cpu. There is no way that board should outperform the Blackops, so either he's got a wicked cpu or the blackops is not very good.

    Any chance you can borrow his 9450 and try it on your BO?
    ---
    Foxconn Blackops G32
    Q9450 @ 3.4GHz (425x8)
    2x2GB G Skill PI 1700Mhz @ 8-8-8-22
    3TB storage

    RAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!

  2. #77
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    61
    Quote Originally Posted by negev View Post
    Hey ryan, as far as i know clock speed limitation should largely be the cpu. There is no way that board should outperform the Blackops, so either he's got a wicked cpu or the blackops is not very good.

    Any chance you can borrow his 9450 and try it on your BO?
    I can see, he does have a watercooling setup so he might not want to take it all apart, but ill certainly ask if i can give it a go

  3. #78
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    36
    Hey Guys,

    ok, so reading this thread ive seen alot of people that are pulling their hair out about getting stable FSB overclocks outs this board. ive tryed a few CPUs on this board, and really the main reason for buying this board was to prove its pricetag by putting in the Dogiest Quad i got my hands on and testing the hell out of it. this post is more to Quad related. as i havent had much experience with Duals on this board, and from what Gendo said:

    Quote Originally Posted by Gendo View Post
    This board has been optimized to run yorkfield quadcores
    it really looks like this board was built for Quads.


    some of my voltages and/or methods may not be agreed on by others but they work (or have worked for me).. always have, from what i understand 45nm Quads (and duals) like a VTT of around 1.38 anything higher doesnt give any advantage and will only kill your CPU eventualy, 65nm quads like around 1.5-1.565v anything too much higher and youll get the same (degradation) but the 65nm quads are more lenient with voltage.

    You HAVE to adjust GTLs and correctly to get higher FSB. on a 45nm Quads adjust GTLs to as close to 63% of VTT, on 65nm adjust GTLs as close to 67% of VTT. if you cant work out how, you need to measure them using a Multimeter and Saaya's pics in Post#1

    below are some pics of the Q6600 i chose to give a hiding, Newest batch i could find, High VID, absolute pig from a golden chip, max bootable was 493fsb, max windows useable was 488fsb, stable i havent tested. but to get 450stable wont be hard. please note some of my voltages are HIGH. but to overclock you need Power right



    and heres some screenies









    This is by far the best X38/X48 board ive used, some 45nm quad numbers to come later

  4. #79
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    291
    Well thanks to others pushing the volts up on there chips and posting results, I have managed a 15hour prime stable plus 20 runs of Itel Burn Test overclock of 3.75 thats 8 x 469mhz on my QX6850.
    CPU VCORE=1.46
    PLL= 508
    VTT=1.575
    GTL CORE O=15, 1=10, 2=12, 3=12
    NB=1.59
    SB=1.6
    VDIMM=1.93 FOR 1877MHZ, 8, 8, 8, 16, PL7,
    My cpu will not do 4 ghz +, stable on this board
    Last edited by RAYTTK; 11-04-2008 at 01:52 PM.


    Asus P9X79PRO, EK MOSFET H20,
    3930K @ 4.8 Full Nickel HF Supreme
    EVGA classified GTX 780 Hydro copper 4 x 4gb Mushkin 1600 @1.5v
    2 X 250 GB Samsung evo RO, 3 x 640 WD Blacks Storage, Corsair AX1200, Phobya Nova 1080, Fesser 120,with GT 1850's

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •