Thanks for the infoOriginally Posted by dippyskoodlez
Thanks for the infoOriginally Posted by dippyskoodlez
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=28155
These is my Gskill FC modules overclocking result.
this is the highest stable setting (passed memtest86, super PI 32M, gaming and etc) for this Gskill FC PC4400
BIOS 414-3
2.8Vdimm
Samsung TCC5, 0522
Well i just got my abit an8 sli and my ocz rev 2 3200 (which i assume is tcc5) and its running 256 mhz at 2.5,3,3,7 with 2.8 vdimm. My only real question is should i feed it more volts for more clocks or is tcc5 the same as tccd and more volts actually reduces stability?
Corsair PC3200C2 Rev4.2 (TCC5)
1.5-2-2-5 T1 @ 450Mhz
2-2-2-5 T1 @ 466Mhz
2.5-3-3-5 T1 @ 610Mhz
2.5-4-3-5 T1 @ 680Mhz
2.5-4-4-5 T1 @ 690Mhz
Could you show some SuperPi 16M-32M screens?Originally Posted by SubX
Any pics
Wolfdale e8400es @4.5Ghz / Ultra-120 Extreme
2GB Ballistix @ 589Mhz 4-4-4-x @ 2.5V - SPI 32M
*** Motherboards tested: DFI Blood Iron (current), Asus P5K3-dlx, DFI P965-S, P5B-Dlx, DFI RD600, Bad Axe 2, EVGA 680i, DS3 and P5W DH ***
Fan modded Zippy 850W, 500GB 7200.11 and EVGA 8800GTX @678/1062
holy crap, nice 4.2s you've got... Mine'll only do up to 2.5-3-3-10 T2 @ 450. I blame socket 754.Originally Posted by SubX
cas 1.5 on tcc5?Originally Posted by SubX
pics please
A64 winchester 3000+
MSI K8N Neo4 platinum
2x256mb Corsair 3200c2pt 4.2 TCC5
MSI 6600GT
According to AMD's datasheets A64 doesn't actually use CL1.5. Even though some boards have that option it isn't *really* CL1.5.
If the RAM can do CL2, it should be able to do this pseudo-CL1.5.
You were not supposed to see this.
so cas 2 on tcc5?Originally Posted by largon
A64 winchester 3000+
MSI K8N Neo4 platinum
2x256mb Corsair 3200c2pt 4.2 TCC5
MSI 6600GT
Although some CPUs prefer CL1.5 than CL2.Originally Posted by largon
I can stabilize my BH5 at CL 1.5 280mhz and CL2 278mhz.
Greets!
are you sure?
i thougt the cas1.5 setting is actually beeing ignored by the system...
SubX:
What about SP32M or prime? Sandra bandwidth is really low for 690Mhz
...
also that second shot of sandra at DDR690 is actually at 2T not 1T like you said...
A64 3800+ venice @ 2.75ghz (252x11)
DFI Lanparty nF4 Ultra-D
2x512mb OCZ Value UTT (252mhz @ 2-2-2-5 1T 3.4v)
Gecube X850XT @ 600/615
Antec Smartpower 500w
520Gig of HDDs
Pioneer 109
Sandra always says that I think....the BW is WAYYYYY too low for those clocks though. Me thinks the 4x multi was used.
Sandra allways shows 2cmd , check it your selfOriginally Posted by wakdog
The BW is low because the CPU multiplier was x7 (crap Venice 0524)
Just got the new Mushkin extreme PC3200 Level 2, I think the part number is 991357.
http://www.mushkin.com/doc/products/...tail.asp?ID=15
I think they carry the TCC5 chips, but im too afraid to take of the heatspreaders to have a peek.
Atm they are doing 270MHz 2.5-3-3-7 with only 2.5v!! And this speed is where my winnies memory controller maxes out, so I cant get em higher. But overall this is real good mem, and they perform like memory that are way more expensive.
I bought em even though a bunch of people recommended me not to, but now I will recommend them to anyone who are looking for some good TCCD like mem!
MSI K8N Neo2 (Korea 0508A2) | A64 3200+ Winnie 0446SPDW @2700MHz 1.60v | A64 X2 3800+ ADBFE 0626DPMW @Still testing - cooled by Big Typhoon| 2x512 Mushkin Extreme L2 @270MHz 2.5-4-3-7 2.5v | Leadtek 6800LE 1.3v@GPU (12x1.6) 450MHz/800MHz | 120Gb Seagate Sata w. NCQ | Chill Innovation 510a PSU made in Denmark! | Lian Li PC7 Plus EU + Additional Lian Li case gear all the way | 19" Hyundai L90D+
According to a thread started by a Mushkin rep (Zebbo) over at OCF, Mushkin has returned to using TCCD, instead of TCC5, in their XP3200 and XP4400.
http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=419290
Just thought that was worth sharing.
I wonder if perhaps they've done the same with the PC3200 Level 2 V2?
Last edited by Reefa_Madness; 10-30-2005 at 12:43 PM.
Its also low because of Single ChannelOriginally Posted by SubX
yep.
I have the same ram as you. If i go under 280mhz the ram s its self. i only just bought it 5 days ago. so far running at 300mhz 1T 2.5-4-3-7 2.8v 1:1 LDT 3xOriginally Posted by Eldonko
DFI NF4 SLI-DR Expert
OPT 146 CABNE 0530
Gecube X1800XTPE
1GB OCZ EL PLAT 4200
I think TCC5 should be a bit better:
As you can see, TCCD is rated 4ns (250MHz) and TCC5 is rated 3,75ns (266,67MHz) at the same timings. But of course, it can be some Samsung gibberish, even though I don't think it is.
Complete .pdf: http://files.upl.silentwhisper.net/u.../TCCD-TCC5.PNG
Ugh, we don't more debate on this....and where is that image from? What's with this CF stuff that can do very well at 1.9V? Pffff....we KNOW this: TCC5 is just a lower binning (at Samsung) of the same die as TCCD.
if you did the math, ddr690's theoretical bandwidth is 5520mb/s, way under the results he postedOriginally Posted by RyderOCZ
or i could be stupid and missing something key
Got a fan over those memory sticks? No? Well get to it before you kill them
Bookmarks