Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 26

Thread: First DirectX 10 footage

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    437

    First DirectX 10 footage

    Hey guys - found this while browsing around:

    http://s2.putfile.com/videos/26010463625.avi

    Its a video from the PDC that crytek put together for a DX10 demo - looks friggin' amazing to me so i thought i'd share it with ya'll...Enjoy!
    Intel 3930k @ 4.55ghz
    Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    Intel SSD 520 480gb
    AMD Radeon 6990
    Corsair AX1200 PSU

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    293
    OMG THATS AMAZING! ohh man i cna't wait to go to DX10 now, after seeing that, OHHHH MAN!
    System 1:
    Asus P5Q-E | Intel Core2Duo E8400 (3.6ghz @ 1.26v) | (2x2gig) Patriot Extreme Performance PC2-8500 (5-5-5-15 @ 2.1v) | ATI 4850 512mb Video Card | Dual monitor Samsung SyncMaster 225bw | Western Digital 640GB Caviar SE16 | LG DVD 16x | LG CDRW 52x24x52x | Windows XP Professional 32-bit | Creative Labs Inspire T5400 5.1 Speaker System | Powered by PC Power & Cooling 750w | Coolermaster Stacker 830 SE | Cool by Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme Aluminum Heatsink

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    449
    the footage is fuzzy, but from what i see it looks damn good. i care more about the interaction with the environment than graphics though, DX10 seems to have both. sweet.
    E8400, P5Q-E, Crucial 2x2GB , XFX 8800GTX , Corsair HX620W
    D-TEK Fuzion, MCW60, Thermochill PA120.2, MCP655

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    256
    Doesn't look bad

  5. #5
    very cool

  6. #6
    The Blue Dolphin
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,816
    I see nothing that can't be done with directX 9

    It looks cool though
    Blue Dolphin Reviews & Guides

    Blue Reviews:
    Gigabyte G-Power PRO CPU cooler
    Vantec Nexstar 3.5" external HDD enclosure
    Gigabyte Poseidon 310 case


    Blue Guides:
    Fixing a GFX BIOS checksum yourself


    98% of the internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that isn't an emo bastard, copy and paste this into your sig.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    230
    What cards will support DX10?
    Asus P5B-deluxe | E4300@3200mhz | 2x1024MB 400Mhz 4-4-4-12| Asus X1950Pro |

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    458
    Quote Originally Posted by alexio
    I see nothing that can't be done with directX 9

    It looks cool though
    A lot of those things can be done to some extent now, but the main difference (from what I can see) appears to be the level of approximation. For example things like soft shadows are calculated very poorly in current graphics.
    DFI nF4 Ultra-D
    1 GB of OCZ PC3700EL Platinum TCCD
    AMD 3500+ Clawhammer (XP-120)
    eVGA 6200 -> 6600 softmod

  9. #9
    Mr. Boardburner
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Posts
    5,340
    Quote Originally Posted by Razor_Sniper
    What cards will support DX10?
    GeForce 8? Radeon X2800?
    Main rig:
    CPU: I7 920C0 @ 3.6Ghz (180*20)
    Mobo: DFI UT X58 T3eH8
    RAM: 12GB OCZ DDR3-1600 Platinum
    GPU/LCD: GeForce GTX280 + GeForce 8600GTS (Quad LCDs)
    Intel X25-M G2 80GB, 12TB storage
    PSU/Case: Corsair AX850, Silverstone TJ07

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    DK
    Posts
    1,026
    O M G !

  11. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    565
    Quote Originally Posted by alexio
    I see nothing that can't be done with directX 9

    It looks cool though
    Maybe true, but I'm betting that DX10 provides a much more efficient codepath for a lot of those operations, something like the difference between SM3.0 and SM2.0b in Far Cry -- the end result may look the same, but the GPU takes one or two passes to render what took five or ten passes before.

    -aMp-

    165 @ 2.9 @ 1.45V | 2x1GB G.Skill HZ | NF4 Ultra-D
    MSI X1900XTX | G500 21" Trinitron
    X-Fi Fatality | Z-2300s | Little Dot MkIII | Beyerdynamic DT770 Pro
    TDX | Maze4 GPU | DDC Topmodded | BIP3
    Stacker STC-T01

  12. #12
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    706
    OMG, that is crazy amazing
    Microsoft's homepage can be found at: thesource-dot-ofallevil-dot-com - interesting, no?

    Think of something witty and imagine it here.

  13. #13
    Moral Police
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,099
    A lot of people are happy about the interaction whilest DX10 Does NOT have ANYTHING to do with that. Only to a VERY small extent and that is that it displays it. Thats it. all the rest even the destruction of entire buildings is all the physics engine, the leaves the same.

    I must say the shadows look good and the fire ok. But those volumetric clouds are no better then the ones I got now in my fav combat flight sim : Pacific Fighters by 1C:Maddox Games

    so if these are the major changes to DX10 from DX9C I'm telling you now we are in for a VERY VERY VERY meager new DX version.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Gentoo User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,468
    We'll probably required to use Winborks Vi$ta to use DX10. Count me out, I'd rather use UNICS on an old PDP machine than use Winborks Vi$ta on an A64 system.

  15. #15
    3dMark Isn't Everything
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,159
    Quote Originally Posted by Entity_Razer
    A lot of people are happy about the interaction whilest DX10 Does NOT have ANYTHING to do with that. Only to a VERY small extent and that is that it displays it. Thats it. all the rest even the destruction of entire buildings is all the physics engine, the leaves the same.

    I must say the shadows look good and the fire ok. But those volumetric clouds are no better then the ones I got now in my fav combat flight sim : Pacific Fighters by 1C:Maddox Games

    so if these are the major changes to DX10 from DX9C I'm telling you now we are in for a VERY VERY VERY meager new DX version.

    Dude it's a very low quality res video for less than 1 minute...........
    Kentsfield Q6600@ 3100Mhz
    Asus P5B-E Plus
    2GB GSkill DDRII PC6400GBHZ
    Albatron Geforce 8800GTX
    Silverstone Temjin TJ-09
    Thermalright Ultra 120
    Corsair 620W HX
    74GB Raptor/ X-Fi Platinum
    19" CRT NEC 930 SB
    Windows XP Pro SP2

  16. #16
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Fantasia
    Posts
    1,297
    Bit-Tech says x1800's and 7800's will support this. Does anyone know more about that claim?

    http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2005/09...cy_directx_10/
    ebay under aws983s, heatware under Mr. Tinker.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    297
    Saw this video earlier today, looks promising.

  18. #18
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    650
    That looks awesome, the interaction, the increased realism of the shadows, the clouds, i only hope it doesnt kill current hardware too much.

    G

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    York, PA
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by masterofpuppets
    We'll probably required to use Winborks Vi$ta to use DX10. Count me out, I'd rather use UNICS on an old PDP machine than use Winborks Vi$ta on an A64 system.
    Im with you on that, microsoft and their DRM can kiss my rear-end

  20. #20
    Xtreme 3DMark Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,225
    I cant view that footage, doesnt work. anyone got screenshots? dx10 isnt comming till r600, g80 and windows vista but I see no reason why winxp and 2k wont work with dx10 videos as long as nvidia and ati make drivers under win2k/xp. I dont know how big a difference there is but from dx8 to dx9 wasnt much of a difference. I guess I could get a dx9 card dirt cheap once dx10 comes out
    3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
    9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!

    9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
    9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
    9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
    9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
    3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
    Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
    3dmark scores with older gpus
    Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551

  21. #21
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    the fire looks horrable imo, but its hard to tell from that crippled video...
    all the stuff in there looks nice but id even go further than saying all this is possible with dx9 hardware, id even say much more is possible with current dx9 hardware

    plus most of this stuff has nothing to do with dx whatever, it only depends on the game engine, and thats what this demo was about, not dx9 or dx10 or 11
    and my comment about the game engine:
    how long has far cry been out?
    and in all that time this is all that has been added to the engine?
    a little dissapointing imo...

    sound has already reached a level of quality and performence that more advanced tech isnt really necessary anymore, most people dont even have a soundcard anymore as the onboard sound quality and performence is simply enough.

    graphics will be next imo, the change from dx9 to dx10 will be the last big step i think. in a couple of years, maybe one decade (3-4 generations of vpus from now) graphics will reach the same spot sound already reached today, after that it will only be about physics and interactivity becomming more and more realisitic.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,755
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya
    sound has already reached a level of quality and performence that more advanced tech isnt really necessary anymore, most people dont even have a soundcard anymore as the onboard sound quality and performence is simply enough.
    I wouldn't be so sure, from all the reviews i have read, it seems like X-Fi is setting a new milestone in PC sound from wich sound in games could greatly benefit if programers take advantage of it.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    793
    Yeah looks promising but any hint of DRM and I am pulling out right then.
    Quote Originally Posted by IYP
    impecible reasoning....the jedi mind skills of the stupid people are overwhelming....but they shall not assimilate me!

  24. #24
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,984
    looks very nice, but im kinda losing track here.

    I thought EA bought "FarCry" just to prevent ubisoft/crytek to release a second supurb game. Because Crytek owns the name FarCry, EA can't do anything with it.

    This is a weird story might be just a rumor or something. Please correct me with something more positive

    Ryzen 9 3900X w/ NH-U14s on MSI X570 Unify
    32 GB Patriot Viper Steel 3733 CL14 (1.51v)
    RX 5700 XT w/ 2x 120mm fan mod (2 GHz)
    Tons of NVMe & SATA SSDs
    LG 27GL850 + Asus MG279Q
    Meshify C white

  25. #25
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Moral Lowground
    Posts
    285
    I think that one of the main Far Cry developers is now an EA man. Here's a link - http://www.megagames.com/news/html/p...nswithea.shtml

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •