Hey guys - found this while browsing around:
http://s2.putfile.com/videos/26010463625.avi
Its a video from the PDC that crytek put together for a DX10 demo - looks friggin' amazing to me so i thought i'd share it with ya'll...Enjoy!
Hey guys - found this while browsing around:
http://s2.putfile.com/videos/26010463625.avi
Its a video from the PDC that crytek put together for a DX10 demo - looks friggin' amazing to me so i thought i'd share it with ya'll...Enjoy!
Intel 3930k @ 4.55ghz
Asus Rampage IV Extreme
Intel SSD 520 480gb
AMD Radeon 6990
Corsair AX1200 PSU
OMG THATS AMAZING! ohh man i cna't wait to go to DX10 now, after seeing that, OHHHH MAN!
System 1:
Asus P5Q-E | Intel Core2Duo E8400 (3.6ghz @ 1.26v) | (2x2gig) Patriot Extreme Performance PC2-8500 (5-5-5-15 @ 2.1v) | ATI 4850 512mb Video Card | Dual monitor Samsung SyncMaster 225bw | Western Digital 640GB Caviar SE16 | LG DVD 16x | LG CDRW 52x24x52x | Windows XP Professional 32-bit | Creative Labs Inspire T5400 5.1 Speaker System | Powered by PC Power & Cooling 750w | Coolermaster Stacker 830 SE | Cool by Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme Aluminum Heatsink
the footage is fuzzy, but from what i see it looks damn good. i care more about the interaction with the environment than graphics though, DX10 seems to have both. sweet.
E8400, P5Q-E, Crucial 2x2GB , XFX 8800GTX , Corsair HX620W
D-TEK Fuzion, MCW60, Thermochill PA120.2, MCP655
Doesn't look bad
very cool
I see nothing that can't be done with directX 9
It looks cool though
Blue Dolphin Reviews & Guides
Blue Reviews:
Gigabyte G-Power PRO CPU cooler
Vantec Nexstar 3.5" external HDD enclosure
Gigabyte Poseidon 310 case
Blue Guides:
Fixing a GFX BIOS checksum yourself
98% of the internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that isn't an emo bastard, copy and paste this into your sig.
What cards will support DX10?
Asus P5B-deluxe | E4300@3200mhz | 2x1024MB 400Mhz 4-4-4-12| Asus X1950Pro |
A lot of those things can be done to some extent now, but the main difference (from what I can see) appears to be the level of approximation. For example things like soft shadows are calculated very poorly in current graphics.Originally Posted by alexio
DFI nF4 Ultra-D
1 GB of OCZ PC3700EL Platinum TCCD
AMD 3500+ Clawhammer (XP-120)
eVGA 6200 -> 6600 softmod
GeForce 8? Radeon X2800?Originally Posted by Razor_Sniper
Main rig:
CPU: I7 920C0 @ 3.6Ghz (180*20)
Mobo: DFI UT X58 T3eH8
RAM: 12GB OCZ DDR3-1600 Platinum
GPU/LCD: GeForce GTX280 + GeForce 8600GTS (Quad LCDs)
Intel X25-M G2 80GB, 12TB storage
PSU/Case: Corsair AX850, Silverstone TJ07
Maybe true, but I'm betting that DX10 provides a much more efficient codepath for a lot of those operations, something like the difference between SM3.0 and SM2.0b in Far Cry -- the end result may look the same, but the GPU takes one or two passes to render what took five or ten passes before.Originally Posted by alexio
-aMp-
165 @ 2.9 @ 1.45V | 2x1GB G.Skill HZ | NF4 Ultra-D
MSI X1900XTX | G500 21" Trinitron
X-Fi Fatality | Z-2300s | Little Dot MkIII | Beyerdynamic DT770 Pro
TDX | Maze4 GPU | DDC Topmodded | BIP3
Stacker STC-T01
OMG, that is crazy amazing
Microsoft's homepage can be found at: thesource-dot-ofallevil-dot-com - interesting, no?
Think of something witty and imagine it here.
A lot of people are happy about the interaction whilest DX10 Does NOT have ANYTHING to do with that. Only to a VERY small extent and that is that it displays it. Thats it. all the rest even the destruction of entire buildings is all the physics engine, the leaves the same.
I must say the shadows look good and the fire ok. But those volumetric clouds are no better then the ones I got now in my fav combat flight sim : Pacific Fighters by 1C:Maddox Games
so if these are the major changes to DX10 from DX9C I'm telling you now we are in for a VERY VERY VERY meager new DX version.
We'll probably required to use Winborks Vi$ta to use DX10. Count me out, I'd rather use UNICS on an old PDP machine than use Winborks Vi$ta on an A64 system.
Originally Posted by Entity_Razer
Dude it's a very low quality res video for less than 1 minute...........
Kentsfield Q6600@ 3100Mhz
Asus P5B-E Plus
2GB GSkill DDRII PC6400GBHZ
Albatron Geforce 8800GTX
Silverstone Temjin TJ-09
Thermalright Ultra 120
Corsair 620W HX
74GB Raptor/ X-Fi Platinum
19" CRT NEC 930 SB
Windows XP Pro SP2
Bit-Tech says x1800's and 7800's will support this. Does anyone know more about that claim?
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2005/09...cy_directx_10/
ebay under aws983s, heatware under Mr. Tinker.
That looks awesome, the interaction, the increased realism of the shadows, the clouds, i only hope it doesnt kill current hardware too much.
G
Im with you on that, microsoft and their DRM can kiss my rear-endOriginally Posted by masterofpuppets
I cant view that footage, doesnt work. anyone got screenshots? dx10 isnt comming till r600, g80 and windows vista but I see no reason why winxp and 2k wont work with dx10 videos as long as nvidia and ati make drivers under win2k/xp. I dont know how big a difference there is but from dx8 to dx9 wasnt much of a difference. I guess I could get a dx9 card dirt cheap once dx10 comes out
3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!
9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
3dmark scores with older gpus
Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551
the fire looks horrable imo, but its hard to tell from that crippled video...
all the stuff in there looks nice but id even go further than saying all this is possible with dx9 hardware, id even say much more is possible with current dx9 hardware
plus most of this stuff has nothing to do with dx whatever, it only depends on the game engine, and thats what this demo was about, not dx9 or dx10 or 11
and my comment about the game engine:
how long has far cry been out?
and in all that time this is all that has been added to the engine?
a little dissapointing imo...
sound has already reached a level of quality and performence that more advanced tech isnt really necessary anymore, most people dont even have a soundcard anymore as the onboard sound quality and performence is simply enough.
graphics will be next imo, the change from dx9 to dx10 will be the last big step i think. in a couple of years, maybe one decade (3-4 generations of vpus from now) graphics will reach the same spot sound already reached today, after that it will only be about physics and interactivity becomming more and more realisitic.
I wouldn't be so sure, from all the reviews i have read, it seems like X-Fi is setting a new milestone in PC sound from wich sound in games could greatly benefit if programers take advantage of it.Originally Posted by saaya
Yeah looks promising but any hint of DRM and I am pulling out right then.
Originally Posted by IYP
looks very nice, but im kinda losing track here.
I thought EA bought "FarCry" just to prevent ubisoft/crytek to release a second supurb game. Because Crytek owns the name FarCry, EA can't do anything with it.
This is a weird story might be just a rumor or something. Please correct me with something more positive
Ryzen 9 3900X w/ NH-U14s on MSI X570 Unify
32 GB Patriot Viper Steel 3733 CL14 (1.51v)
RX 5700 XT w/ 2x 120mm fan mod (2 GHz)
Tons of NVMe & SATA SSDs
LG 27GL850 + Asus MG279Q
Meshify C white
I think that one of the main Far Cry developers is now an EA man. Here's a link - http://www.megagames.com/news/html/p...nswithea.shtml
Bookmarks