There it is! BH-5 is back again!

**kryptobs2000** · 02-19-2005, 10:32 PM

What can ch5/utt run it at? 13 I'm guessing? any other limitations?

**Enz0** · 02-19-2005, 11:44 PM

Originally Posted by TekXoID

Hey Enz0, we have pretty similar ram and FSB, I was wondering what A64 Tweaker settings
you use as I have been pretty unsucessful getting anything out of the tweak-tool myself.

Sorry, I don't use A64 Tweaker.
But, I write all my settings in my signature.
Look at this,
http://angrygames.com/nf4-bios2.htm
and compare the settings to A64 Tweaker.

Originally Posted by kryptobs2000

What can ch5/utt run it at? 13 I'm guessing? any other limitations?

14 or looser.

**Skip** · 02-20-2005, 01:56 AM

what are the chances of twinmos to start selling direct? like how mushkin does it.

**SeBA_StiAn** · 02-20-2005, 02:50 AM

good very good
max. mhz?? I dont see
only 400mhz 2225 ??

**Ref** · 02-20-2005, 04:10 AM

It is a proof that is it BH5 - because only BH5 and TCCD can run 2-2-2-5 at LOW voltage.

and results "max mhz" - 250 MHz 2-2-2-5 @ 3.36 V - 2x512 MB

Hope that Alonso will bring more results at higher voltage

**saaya** · 02-20-2005, 06:35 AM

are those 512mb sticks with 8 or 16 chips, so are they ss or ds? thx

**largon** · 02-20-2005, 07:00 AM

Originally Posted by saaya

are those 512mb sticks with 8 or 16 chips, so are they ss or ds? thx

Definately 16 chips. 8 chips would require double capacity for ICs (256Mbit vs. 512Mbit)

**fareastgq** · 02-20-2005, 08:57 AM

if anything more variety is good

bh-6, bh-5, ch-5, utt, new bh-5, it's all good for lowering prices

**alexio** · 02-20-2005, 08:58 AM

Alonso please up the voltage to atleast 3.6V and see what these things can do !!!!

**~~Shroomalistic~~** · 02-20-2005, 09:12 AM

so is this how its gonna be:

SpeedPremium 3200 = CH-5 UTT
Non-SP 3200 = BH-5 UTT

So are they replacing the current AADT's with 1A4T's

**s0ck** · 02-20-2005, 10:03 AM

Hi all, first post

This forum is definitely where the hardcore action is, unlike our lame (oc)UK forums...

Just wondering, what is UTT short for?

A m8 of mine has some CH5 which did 275MHz 1:1 @ 3.6v. I'm not sure if it was stable but he was running a few benches with it, etc. These were 2 * 256MB, single sided modules I believe.

**GazC** · 02-20-2005, 10:38 AM

Originally Posted by s0ck

Hi all, first post

This forum is definitely where the hardcore action is, unlike our lame (oc)UK forums...

Just wondering, what is UTT short for?

A m8 of mine has some CH5 which did 275MHz 1:1 @ 3.6v. I'm not sure if it was stable but he was running a few benches with it, etc. These were 2 * 256MB, single sided modules I believe.

Welcome s0ck,

I guess you'll soon be banned from OCUK forums when one of their guys reads that, the mods are bloody nazis at that place.

The definition of UTT is not certain, but it is believed to mean UnTesTed, as the speed binning seems to be the responsibility of the guys who are buying the ICs from Winbond.

**Bennah** · 02-20-2005, 11:13 AM

So whats happening with the twinmos mem?

Chances to get CH-5 and BH-5 ?

**~~Shroomalistic~~** · 02-20-2005, 12:31 PM

Originally Posted by Bennah

So whats happening with the twinmos mem?

Chances to get CH-5 and BH-5 ?

Not quite understanding what your asking

**Rondrian** · 02-20-2005, 12:48 PM

WELL

Infinion helped WinBond with there high producing technology (so they could assamble better ch-5 chips, 13nm tchnology is a bit harder to handle....) So these chips, produced by WinBond are actually WinBond/Infinion chips. Now you know, why they were able to push ch-5 up to their architecture-based limits. I love our german ingeneers

keep on assambling, WINBOND! WE LOVE YOUR CHIPS AND CHIPARCHITECTURE!

i'm sorry for my rather bad English

**uwackme** · 02-20-2005, 02:10 PM

hehe, no problem Ron, it's better than my bad German

Somebody had to do something to get CH5 to perform so well. Glad they did.

**Rabbi_NZ** · 02-20-2005, 02:16 PM

Are the BH UTT series about to come out going to be an Inifion/Winbond callobration as well?

**enok** · 02-20-2005, 02:35 PM

looking at Alonso first oc... i would say... yes!

**Rabbi_NZ** · 02-20-2005, 02:42 PM

Originally Posted by enok

looking at Alonso first oc... i would say... yes!

my corsair PC3500 did 245 2-2-2 with 3.2v... and that was rock solid stable in memtest. Alonso's result's are nothing old BH5 couldnt do

**largon** · 02-20-2005, 03:19 PM

Originally Posted by Rabbi_NZ

my corsair PC3500 did 245 2-2-2 with 3.2v... and that was rock solid stable in memtest. Alonso's result's are nothing old BH5 couldnt do

Corsair prolly did some speedbinning (?)...Not every module of the orig. BH5 did tight DC250.
After looking at larger amounts of results we'll see have they optimised these new chips.

**HiJon89** · 02-20-2005, 03:19 PM

Originally Posted by Rabbi_NZ

my corsair PC3500 did 245 2-2-2 with 3.2v... and that was rock solid stable in memtest. Alonso's result's are nothing old BH5 couldnt do

Was it 2x512MB of 2x256MB?

**Rabbi_NZ** · 02-20-2005, 03:50 PM

Originally Posted by HiJon89

Was it 2x512MB of 2x256MB?

2x512 1T nF2 Abit NF7-S... on my current rig I bet they'd go higher too

**Saliman** · 02-20-2005, 04:43 PM

wow... i sure hope these are coming back again

**kristos** · 02-20-2005, 05:19 PM

Originally Posted by Revv23

seems to me that if DH-5 was going to be much better they would call it DH-4 am i right?

from my point of view it seems like they are using the die shrink solely to cut costs, which doesnt mean better speeds to me, as smaller process cannot handle as much voltage, and they may cut even more corners to save even more money like they did with CH...

then it wouldn't make sense for them to start making BH-5 for them because it's a more costly chip then CH-5

**QerryTerry** · 02-20-2005, 05:25 PM

Alonso - could you tell me where you bought that stick of ram ??

I might get one too if the price is right.

QT

Thread: There it is! BH-5 is back again!

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

hmm

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions