Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 73 of 73

Thread: TCCD has been discontinued

  1. #51
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    2,055
    Quote Originally Posted by I(illa Bee
    All hail DH-5!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Me wonders if OPK has DH-5...
    Makes me wonder what you are talking about.

    DH-5
    OPK

    Care to elaborate?
    "M-I-A"

  2. #52
    Charcoal or propane?
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    1,299
    i believe he means OnePageBook, and the mystery RAM that he picked up a while ago.

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=52117

  3. #53
    Xtreme 3DTeam Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    "The Land of Chocolate", USA
    Posts
    795
    http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/02...s_6118242.html


    a bit more on XDR. Looks like it will find its way into PS3. Rambus lives!
    6800U 31.7K '01*15.8K '03*7.2K '05

    ...building a dual 254 rig on the MSI K8N Master2-FAR SLI

  4. #54
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    73
    Quote Originally Posted by bias_hjorth
    Makes me wonder what you are talking about.

    DH-5
    OPK

    Care to elaborate?
    im sorry, i ment OPB...I Think i typed OPK thinking of the operation peace keeper mod for BFV... OPK, lol sorry, damm acronyms

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=52117

  5. #55
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    159
    One thing that puzzles me is in that samsung press report linked on the 1st page, it says that xdr is more than 10x faster than ddr400 and more than 5x faster than pc800 RD ram. I had pc 800 RD ram in an old p4 for a while and it was a hell of a lot slower than any ddr 400, much less any nice overclocked tccd (since were on the topic here). Am I mistaken? I was thinking pc800 rdram was for a 400mhz fsb p4, and 1066 rd ram was for 533mhz fsb p4's before they went 2.4c etc with the 800mhz fsb and ddr400. Oh well, it stinks that theres no more tccd, but I would immagine that there will be some form of replacment (in one form or another) before the whole DDR era is over.

  6. #56
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    397
    What timings will XDR RAM have? Hopefully not CL30-40-40-80
    AMD Athlon 64 3200+ NewCastle @ 240 x 10 = 2400 MHz @ 1.550 V
    MSI K8N Neo Platinum 1.52 Beta BIOS
    2x 512 MB DDR500 A-DATA Vitesta Hynix @ 240 MHz 1:1 2.5-3-3-7 1T 2.85V 24/7
    Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro R350
    Enermax EG365AX-VE FMA 3.3V@32A 5V@32A 12V@26A
    DVD-RW TEAC
    Seagate 200 GB SATA + Maxtor 300 GB SATA

  7. #57
    legitreviews
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    75
    I just want to let everyone in this thread know that Legit Reviews has published an article dealing with the Samsung TCCD issue. In the Article they have comments from OCZ, Kingston, Corsair, and Mushkin dealing with the situation.

    The article can be found here: http://www.legitreviews.com/article.php?aid=161



    Looks like we can all sit back and relax because TCCD's are here for months and months.

    Also they have a quote from Ryan the CEO of OCZ saying that Samsung has cut production back. This goes against what Big Toe said (who is an employee of OCZ) about them stopping production all together.
    Last edited by Apoptosis; 02-09-2005 at 03:14 PM.

  8. #58
    Xtreme 3DMark Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,225
    god will I have to buy the best tccd I can get before its gone and anyone with any left wants like 500 bucks a gig?
    3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
    9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!

    9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
    9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
    9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
    9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
    3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
    Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
    3dmark scores with older gpus
    Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551

  9. #59
    Xtreme 3DMark Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,225
    http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...231-008&depa=0
    http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...231-006&depa=0

    why is the la $30 more and its only rated pc3200 while the le is pc4400? I bet the le can also do pc3200 clocks at 2-2-2-5 but I want 290+ 1:1 t1 at 2.5-3-3-x when I go venice. seeing that samsung is discountinuing their tccd line, I must act quick before tccd prices shoot thru the roof and supplies dry up. I can keep my patriot but I can only achieve ~250fsb. It is most likley my ondie controller but I can play it safe and ebay this patriot and pay the few extra $ for gskill and ill be guaranteed at least 275 1:1 with venice. I am tempted to go for the le unless the la is constantly better, like ddr600 at 2.7v t1 2.5-3-3-x itll also prove once and for all if my winchester is limting me or not but ill go Venice once they come out. Please tell me what I should do.

    1. keep the patriot and take a chance that tccd wont jump to $400+ and also take a chance and hope my patriot does 275+ in my venice
    2. get gskill Le for $262
    3. get gskill La for $292(tell me why)
    3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
    9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!

    9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
    9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
    9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
    9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
    3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
    Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
    3dmark scores with older gpus
    Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551

  10. #60
    Xtreme X.I.P. MaxxxRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles, Ca USA
    Posts
    12,551
    Its open season on the Samsung Executives, thats all I got to say.

  11. #61
    Xtreme 3DMark Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,225
    ok I am going with the le, its much better. $30 cheaper, 2.5-3-3 and t1 timing. The la does do 300fsb(if your ondie controller is good enough) but at 3-4-4 and t2 it would be way slower than the le. 2x256mb arent an option for me as I need the gig for gaming. so its either I keep my patriot and hope it does high when I get venice or get gskill which most likley will just be wasted with the winchester till I go venice. I could wait till I go venice but wont gskill be like $400 by then?
    3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
    9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!

    9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
    9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
    9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
    9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
    3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
    Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
    3dmark scores with older gpus
    Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551

  12. #62
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    US, Virginia
    Posts
    1,513
    Quote Originally Posted by madgamer
    One thing that puzzles me is in that samsung press report linked on the 1st page, it says that xdr is more than 10x faster than ddr400 and more than 5x faster than pc800 RD ram. I had pc 800 RD ram in an old p4 for a while and it was a hell of a lot slower than any ddr 400, much less any nice overclocked tccd (since were on the topic here). Am I mistaken? I was thinking pc800 rdram was for a 400mhz fsb p4, and 1066 rd ram was for 533mhz fsb p4's before they went 2.4c etc with the 800mhz fsb and ddr400. Oh well, it stinks that theres no more tccd, but I would immagine that there will be some form of replacment (in one form or another) before the whole DDR era is over.
    rdram I think was 32bit while running at 800mhz, pc3200 ddr is 64bit while running at 400mhz. So they are about the same speed, or rather, same bandwidth. ddr is usually faster for a few other reasons, one is you can have tighter timings, not sure how much tigher, and this isn't the whole reason why it's better, and I'm not sure if I'm 100% accurate.

    But this makes me wonder, I'd like to see some actual numbers rather than this is x times faster than this, that dosn't mean too much.
    E8400 @ 3600mhz
    4870 @ 790/1100
    2x2GB DDR2

  13. #63
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    389
    Quote Originally Posted by bias_hjorth
    Bh5 / 6 was very very long on the market before they took it of. Tccd has been here a while now to.
    True, but the newer revision TCCD have only been around for a few months.

    Glad I got the Gskill when I did. Not really as they dropped by over $30
    not two weeks after I bought mine. Such is the nature of PC hardware.
    By the time it comes to market they already have two better products lined up.
    ~ SolTek SL-75FRN2-RL (nForce2) = 10x230fsb, 2.0/2/2/11
    ~ 1800+ DLT3C/VPMW/0307 ~ Leadtek 6800nu (unlocked 16/6)
    ~ PCP&C 425deluxe ~ Gskill "LE" 1gb TCCD/437 ~ 36gb Raptor/200gb Barracuda ~ SLK-900a
    The MIND is like a parachute - works best when OPEN

  14. #64
    Xtreme 3D Mark Team Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Juneau Alaska
    Posts
    7,607
    kinda annoying that samsung can do this.
    purposefully stop producing TCCD to push DDR2 (which no one seems to be buying anyways) to almost force the market to a direction they want it to go...
    seems kinda shady if you ask me.
    especially since DDR2 is basically intel stuff, and intel is doing so poorly with thier attempts with DDR2 on the market so far...




    "The command and conquer model," said the EA CEO, "doesn't work. If you think you're going to buy a developer and put your name on the label... you're making a profound mistake."

  15. #65
    Moral Police
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,099
    Can't another company lisence TCCD technology and just produce it themselves?

  16. #66
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Berkeley/Stanford, CA, USA
    Posts
    2,611
    Quote Originally Posted by Kunaak
    kinda annoying that samsung can do this.
    purposefully stop producing TCCD to push DDR2 (which no one seems to be buying anyways) to almost force the market to a direction they want it to go...
    seems kinda shady if you ask me.
    especially since DDR2 is basically intel stuff, and intel is doing so poorly with thier attempts with DDR2 on the market so far...
    exactly, but i mean.... theres more money in it for them in ddr2 cuz they can charge more for new technology

    can you see the light? is it shining too bright? can you see the light at the end of the tunnel, i know i do, i know its true.

  17. #67
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    389
    Quote Originally Posted by blinky
    exactly, but i mean.... theres more money in it for them in ddr2 cuz they can charge more for new technology
    How true.

  18. #68
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,835
    Intel FTW!

    Beanna

  19. #69
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    936
    I'd get some TM SP over tccd any day anyway. I never thought tccd was that big of a deal.
    ALIENS are bringing my next kentsfield based rig in a UFO case!

  20. #70
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    118
    Quote Originally Posted by Kunaak
    kinda annoying that samsung can do this.
    purposefully stop producing TCCD to push DDR2 (which no one seems to be buying anyways) to almost force the market to a direction they want it to go...
    seems kinda shady if you ask me.
    especially since DDR2 is basically intel stuff, and intel is doing so poorly with thier attempts with DDR2 on the market so far...
    if amd wants to stop making cpu's tomorrow they can. if ford want to stop making cars tomorrow - they can.
    tbh if any of you were on the board and it was a "well we can stop making this ram, which only a small group of overclockers use.... or we can make the move into DDR2 which a huge company called Intel with a huge customer called Dell are using" situation - what would you do?

    ....

    Sometimes a lot of you guys fail to see past your own nose. These are multi-billon dollar companies and the overclocking market - should it fall dead tomorrow - wont dent them.
    Also if TCCD ceases to exist, the world wont end. Its not great news, but I wouldnt put it up there with when BH-5 went and there was nothing else in its place. At least now you have the OCZ VX and prolly some other ram waiting in the wings.

    Chill out
    Last edited by Gokou; 02-10-2005 at 06:09 AM.

  21. #71
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by Ref
    What timings will XDR RAM have? Hopefully not CL30-40-40-80
    Anyone knows?
    AMD Athlon 64 3200+ NewCastle @ 240 x 10 = 2400 MHz @ 1.550 V
    MSI K8N Neo Platinum 1.52 Beta BIOS
    2x 512 MB DDR500 A-DATA Vitesta Hynix @ 240 MHz 1:1 2.5-3-3-7 1T 2.85V 24/7
    Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro R350
    Enermax EG365AX-VE FMA 3.3V@32A 5V@32A 12V@26A
    DVD-RW TEAC
    Seagate 200 GB SATA + Maxtor 300 GB SATA

  22. #72
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Mi. U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,218
    I just don't see this as anywhere near as big a deal as some in this thread are making it.

    UTT is at hand, so it's not like when Winbond stopped making memory.

    And as BH5 is showing so well in the new NF4 boards many of us have no need for new RAM anyway.

    By the time a rig with a gig of BH5, TCCD or UTT in a DFI NF II MB with a good vid card of your choice needs replaced then Samsung may well have out this new XDR memory into channel. Such a present day high end rig won't be at the top of the ORB in a year, but it will still be faster than the crap Dell is shipping then will be.

    At which point RAM may not be a bottleneck for a while. I say "may not" cause who knows what's going to happen in the area of CPU's and chipsets meantime.

    I'm expecting to build a new rig in a few months, and I expect I'll use a gig of BH5 in it.

  23. #73
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    182
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam
    HOLY CRAP !!! ...NO WAY .... THE FUTURE IS XDR !!!!

    THE SAME DAY THAT ANNOUCE THE END OF TCCD, THEY ANNOUNCE THIS ON THEIR WEBSITE:

    SAMSUNG Electronics Goes into Mass Production of the World’s Fastest Memory for Multimedia Applications

    I just hope it can OC !!!

    Perkam
    WOW
    so the way I see it, its not only TCCD we should be saying good bye to, but also DDR2
    and DDR2 had an even shorter run, if you compare DDR2vsDDR (not to mention SDR) and TCCDvsBH5 (or others)

    I gotta say WOW again, man this would be so sweet, like someone mentioned earlier, running ram at 1:1 with the proc's cache would be maddddddddddness !!! (aka sweeeeeeeetness )

    D

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •