i too, would like to know how the trip to münchen was. please tell.Originally Posted by perkam
i too, would like to know how the trip to münchen was. please tell.Originally Posted by perkam
whoa macci, what proc was that? 3500 winchester?
insane! 500 mhz less than the fx and still so close in scores, looking forward to see you break those 8.5k points.
sky / s!p - we are oldskool, dammit.
Its FX55. Wish I had a Winny that runs at 3G (in other words a winny that runs w/ cold temps) - it would be faster than that FX55 clock to clock in this test
@macci hunt is restart ?
Last edited by M.Yazıcıoğlu; 12-02-2004 at 03:04 PM.
whoaaa nice mem clocks
can you see the light? is it shining too bright? can you see the light at the end of the tunnel, i know i do, i know its true.
We may have some pleasing scores in the next few days
Here it is my new FX-55, with the MSI K8N Neo2 with no mods at all - just using Bios 1.41 and MSI Core Center to raise de cpu core.
These new TCCD are really great, but very likely we will use the BH-5 to the 3Dmark 2001 run.
Using my old Mach1/404a to cool the CPU..
And this one just for the screen
CPU cascade redone (now Ricky cascade ver 1.2 ), GPU cascade redone tomorow I hope ..finally we have a decent X800XT hope can do 800 core (previous never passed 750)
If this FX-55 escalate with -100ºc like my previous FX-53WR, I can expect more 400mhz benchable speed (3DMark, pifast etc) and 500mhz or more just the screenie ..
It quite amazing the heat dissipated by the FX-55, I gain almost 100mhz just from the change from a stock Mach2 to a Prometeia with 404a ..so can't wait to see the speed of this babe at -108º C
Expect some news in the next few days..
Last edited by Pedro Rocha; 12-04-2004 at 02:16 PM.
wow 3.5GHz 3dmarkable should be worth like 41.5k marks! Gonna be pretty close to OPPs 3.57GHz score id say
3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!
9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
3dmark scores with older gpus
Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551
You dont need more than 3475 too get 41866pOriginally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8283684
i think i must get that heat spreader of the cpu... Hope it can give me 50-100more mhz?
What doo you guys think? Is it worth the risk of a dead cpu?
Regards
Overklokk
First in world over 90k in 3D Mark 03 with 90400p
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5160409
how would removing the heatspreader help? It may hurt it cause its suppose to spread the heat away from the die. your 100MHz below OPPs cpu power yet you edge him in the system tests. I guess his win2k3 is hurting him more than I thought there. OPP is still the champ cause of the 340 nature and no one can get within 100MHz of his cpu clocks.
3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!
9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
3dmark scores with older gpus
Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551
Better look over your maths, do you think a cascade only worth 200mhz more in comparison with a Prometeia ?Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
Last edited by Pedro Rocha; 12-04-2004 at 05:00 PM.
Then OPPs score should be at least 1k higher than what its at now and win2k3 shouldnt be costing him 1000 marks, xp yes. eshbach gets almost 10 marks per cpu MHz, so lets say 10 per MHz. Overklokk needs about 3.6GHz cpu power to just barely break 43k. if you disagree, let me know what itll be then
edit: I see people hit ~3.2 on prom, 3.4-3.5 on cascade. maybe youll get a lucky chip and hit 3.6 If you use more than 2 stage cascade then it could be 3.7
3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!
9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
3dmark scores with older gpus
Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551
What could be better at spreading/removing heat than copper holding -90c?Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
The HS is one more layer to increase thermal resistans. Removing HS can and will give better temps. This is basic physics mr.Ti4200
so what was the point of amd using heatspreaders in a64s if they all do better without them and itll save amd a buck per cpu?
3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!
9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
3dmark scores with older gpus
Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551
it saves AMD money because they dont have to reaplace cracked cpu'sOriginally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
and it helps noobs get better contact
can you see the light? is it shining too bright? can you see the light at the end of the tunnel, i know i do, i know its true.
With a HS on they dont get as many RMAs (chipped cores) as without, and its much more easy to mount cooling solutions. You dont need the same perfect finish on the bottom of heatsink either, as the area to transfer heat is greater. BUT, with really good cooling the increased thermal resistanse will result in higher temps.Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
If you think about it, its quite clear. Why should the thermalpaste between the AMD HS be better than the one we supply?
The more layers of copper and thermal paste, the more thermal resistanse we will get.
LOL!Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
Do you think AMD cares how high a CPU will overclock??
The core is pretty fragile and easily cracked in the wrong hands.
Good enough a reason for AMD to put a spreader on.
There is a sticky in the best of AMD about this where ppl gained over 75MHz.
You say not worth it?
Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z | FX 8350 | 2x4GB Trident-X 2600 C10 | 2x ATI HD5870 Crossfire | Enermax Revo 1050watt | OCZ Vertex 3 60GB | Samsung F1 1TB
Watercooling: XSPC Raystorm | EK 5870 Delrin fullcover | TFC X-changer 480 w/ 4x Gentle Typhoon | DDC2+ Delrin top | EK 200mm res | Primochill LRT 3/8 tubing
Case: Murdermodded TJ-07
sub 9 sec. SPi1M 940BE 955BE 965BE 1090T
**Overklokk** @ Ocshoot.no 42K
Congrats
Yeah watch out for the crazy Norway guy!!
Intel FTW!
Beanna
Bookmarks