Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 59

Thread: 90nm 3200+ run DDR600 1:1 1T

  1. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Land of Buckeye
    Posts
    2,881
    Quote Originally Posted by LardArse
    FYI, I can speak mandarin and read chinese
    bh2k, I'm wondering why that 4.7G screenie has a 3.6G checksum code...
    Not impossible without good photoshop skills

    wow..you should tell me earlier about this, then you can pm me your phone number, I can explain more to you!:p

  2. #27
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    2,440
    Ahem, is that even necessary, just to explain a screenshot? Is there a long story involved?

  3. #28
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Berkeley/Stanford, CA, USA
    Posts
    2,611
    Quote Originally Posted by LardArse
    FYI, I can speak mandarin and read chinese
    bh2k, I'm wondering why that 4.7G screenie has a 3.6G checksum code...
    Not impossible without good photoshop skills
    in this pic, u can see that all of his scores have have the "published" box greyed out, hmm i wonder why




    also shamino can u make the checksum checker available to the community, or are you worried about peope reverse engineering it to edit pictures with the correct checksum?

    can you see the light? is it shining too bright? can you see the light at the end of the tunnel, i know i do, i know its true.

  4. #29
    Fused
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,769
    ok thanks... downloading the checksum...

  5. #30
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    2,440
    Blinky, it was verified by Franck himself. You can email him the checksums and he will verify it for you, if he doesn't have too much on his hands that is

  6. #31
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Over here!!
    Posts
    443
    sometimes it`s just a glitch in the matrix. :p
    The world`s only triple phase-changer PC in one case.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,672
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukee
    sometimes it`s just a glitch in the matrix. :p
    Glitch has absolutely NOTHING to do with the checksum reading correctly. The link you included, is a bug in displaying fsb and clock frequency which IS reproduceable, and most likely effected by other software.

    The actual Frequency/fsb display, and the checksum will still indicate the displayed information. Thus your link only shows a detection bug, or faked screenshot through manipulation.

    Onepagebook, rather then explain this privately why don't you just post a translation of the incorrect checksum here.
    Last edited by Karnivore; 10-21-2004 at 05:15 PM.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Over here!!
    Posts
    443
    I`m sorry for my ignorance, what is this checksum?
    The world`s only triple phase-changer PC in one case.

  9. #34
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    East Bay, California
    Posts
    454
    The checksum is the number above the CPU-Z logo in the bottom left of the application.
    Last edited by CTKP; 10-21-2004 at 05:59 PM.

  10. #35
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Kaohsiung.Taiwan
    Posts
    72
    SORRY

  11. #36
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Kaohsiung.Taiwan
    Posts
    72



  12. #37
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Getting back to the the Original Post....
    I dont get it, both the 3000+ and the 3500+ can go 2.6 on air....
    How come the 3200 can only do 2.4 ??
    YOU JUST ANSWERED MY QUESTION !!!!

    Congrats, that is some eyecandy?

    I mean, thats what most FX-51s do on water - Sheesh

    How did you manage that? DDR Booster ??

    Perkam
    Last edited by perkam; 10-21-2004 at 09:43 PM.

  13. #38
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Kaohsiung.Taiwan
    Posts
    72
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam
    YOU JUST ANSWERED MY QUESTION !!!!

    Congrats, that is some eyecandy?

    I mean, thats what most FX-51s do on water - Sheesh

    How did you manage that? DDR Booster ??

    Perkam

    f you can get 3200+ like mine, you definitely can carack it up to 2.8g, 1.625v with hyper 6 HS. The reason is fairly obvious that 90nm is lot more overclockable than 130nm though!

  14. #39
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    You chose the hyper6 over the xp-90/120...Why ???

    BTW, you still havent told me what ram you're using ??

  15. #40
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,672
    Quote Originally Posted by LardArse
    Really? So why is coolaler's 4.7G prescott detected correctly as 4.7G on the 2003 ORB while everyone's elses after 4+G gets detected as 200Mhz less? And is he ever gonna publish that result?
    http://coolaler.nil.com.tw/images/TOP/top2.gif

    And why is the CPUZ checksum a 3.6G P4 when the screenie is of a 4.7G?
    http://coolaler.nil.com.tw/images/TOP/top0.gif

    Link to the "mean" overclocker's web page:
    http://www.coolaler.com/article/article.php/158

    So is he ever gona put up a screenie of his FX @ 3.4G with CPUZ check sum? Will he be kind enough to do a 2001 or 2005 3d mark run at 3.3 or 3.4G?
    Here is a screenshot of the clockspeed indicated by the checksum.



  16. #41
    Xtreme Enthusiast p4z1f1st's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    789
    Quote Originally Posted by peter lu


    why is the voltage canceled out?....

    ----- AMD K6-2 300 "Chomper" xxxxx xxxx xxxx /// 300 MHz @ 2,200 V -----
    ----- AMD Athlon XP 1700+ "Thouroghbred B" JIUHB 0306 MPMW /// 2400 MHz @ 1,900 V -----
    ----- AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+ "Barton" AQXEA 0327 UPMW /// 2450 MHz @ 1,850 V -----
    ----- AMD Athlon XP-M 2600+ "Barton" IQYHA 0401 XPMW /// 2500 MHz @ 1,750 V -----
    ----- AMD Athlon 64 3000+ "Newcastle CG" xxxxx 0418 WPMW /// 2600 MHz @ 1,600 V -----
    ----- AMD Athlon 64 3200+ "Winchester D0" xxxxx 0433 SPMW /// 2750 MHz @ 1,616 V -----

    ----- AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE "Callisto" xxxxx xxxx xxxx /// 4080MHz @ 1,375 V -----
    ----- AMD Ryzen "Zen" xxxxx xxxx xxxx /// TBA @ TBA -----

  17. #42
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    300 2.5-3-3, nice!
    is that speed 3dmark stable?

    but yeah, why is the vcore blurred out?

  18. #43
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    934
    Quote Originally Posted by LardArse
    Really? So why is coolaler's 4.7G prescott detected correctly as 4.7G on the 2003 ORB while everyone's elses after 4+G gets detected as 200Mhz less? And is he ever gonna publish that result?
    http://coolaler.nil.com.tw/images/TOP/top2.gif

    And why is the CPUZ checksum a 3.6G P4 when the screenie is of a 4.7G?
    http://coolaler.nil.com.tw/images/TOP/top0.gif

    Link to the "mean" overclocker's web page:
    http://www.coolaler.com/article/article.php/158

    So is he ever gona put up a screenie of his FX @ 3.4G with CPUZ check sum? Will he be kind enough to do a 2001 or 2005 3d mark run at 3.3 or 3.4G?
    That's pretty suspect that he has those secondary clockspeed boxes conveniently covering up the checksums in every picture. It's not like those clockspeed boxes show anything new.... it's the same information the other CPU-Z window already shows. No reason for those secondary clockspeed windows to even be open.....
    DFI LP LT X38-T2R
    Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
    Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
    2x2GB OCZ Reaper DDR2 PC8500
    eVGA 9800 GX2
    WD Raptor X 150GB
    PCP&P 750W Silencer
    CM Stacker 830 SE

  19. #44
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by LardArse
    FYI, I can speak mandarin and read chinese
    bh2k, I'm wondering why that 4.7G screenie has a 3.6G checksum code...
    Not impossible without good photoshop skills



    Sorry to say this but When one of most respect BOSS of Coolaler BB. Coolaler's result been treat like this but this is nothing because as a result as true as rock Coolaler will have nothing to scare about lo i'm sure he will confirm the result through OPB in no time la

    if you see Coolaler's tool for OC (Lx2) you will be sure that result is easy to obtain, like stealing candy from children's hand

    and i'm a long member of Coolaler BB and also through OPB for the first time i know there is a place call xtremsystem.org and i also respect few of strong OCer in here. but as OPB said before in our fourm we don't know anything about CPU-Z check sum but we only care about the true abillity of OCing..............this stuff (check sum) is the first time as well!!

    please LardArse even you are the mod and you got all the right you got to suspect anyone's result but i think you should given people time to confirm their result!!

  20. #45
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by z24


    Sorry to say this but When one of most respect BOSS of Coolaler BB. Coolaler's result been treat like this but this is nothing because as a result as true as rock Coolaler will have nothing to scare about lo i'm sure he will confirm the result through OPB in no time la

    if you see Coolaler's tool for OC (Lx2) you will be sure that result is easy to obtain, like stealing candy from children's hand

    and i'm a long member of Coolaler BB and also through OPB for the first time i know there is a place call xtremsystem.org and i also respect few of strong OCer in here. but as OPB said before in our fourm we don't know anything about CPU-Z check sum but we only care about the true abillity of OCing..............this stuff (check sum) is the first time as well!!

    please LardArse even you are the mod and you got all the right you got to suspect anyone's result but i think you should given people time to confirm their result!!
    welcome to XtremeSystems

    we are waiting

  21. #46
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    8
    Uncle Coolaler, he not only makes amazing overclocking records, he also helps many persons to overclock their computers, even linking the L1 bridges of Athlon for us (we couldn't use pencil any more at that time), totally kostlos!! We won't doubt what he did about overclocking, because he can show us whenever we want!

    Without CPU-Z frequency checker, checksum is useless,
    so even Coolaler covered it, I don't care.
    I think uncle Coolaler won't cover the checksum in the future.
    Because it is Coolaler's style ------ "You wanna see? Show you!"

  22. #47
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    welcome to xtremesystems
    are you from germany?

    and you can send any checksum you want to check to vr-zone or cpuid.com and they will tell you if its faked or not

    there are a lot of fakes and showing the checksum makes it much better!
    its just a tiny spot, so there is no need to hide it, no problem to show it on a 1024x768 screenshot :P

  23. #48
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya
    welcome to xtremesystems
    are you from germany?

    and you can send any checksum you want to check to vr-zone or cpuid.com and they will tell you if its faked or not

    there are a lot of fakes and showing the checksum makes it much better!
    its just a tiny spot, so there is no need to hide it, no problem to show it on a 1024x768 screenshot :P
    Vielen Dank, Sie sind sehr nett.
    I am a Taiwanese.
    Ich liebe Taiwan und Deutschland.

    You said we can send the checksum, yes, you are right, thanks, I didn't know the checksum until I got in XS.
    Can we get the RAM frequency from the checksum?
    We can get CPU type, CPU frequency and what else from the checksum?

    It is Octobor now...a raining month in Germany?

  24. #49
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    yeah, within the last week the time without sunlight has increased by 4 hours!

    sun getting up 2 hours later and setting to hours earlier... and its getting cold! 12°C outside :S

    i think the checksum only shows cpu speed and cpu type, i hope franck upgrades it to show fsb speed, memory speed and maybe timings and vcore

    how come you speak german?
    have you lived in germany?

  25. #50
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya
    yeah, within the last week the time without sunlight has increased by 4 hours!

    sun getting up 2 hours later and setting to hours earlier... and its getting cold! 12°C outside :S

    i think the checksum only shows cpu speed and cpu type, i hope franck upgrades it to show fsb speed, memory speed and maybe timings and vcore

    how come you speak german?
    have you lived in germany?
    Ich liebe Hamburg, weil dort kalt nicht ist, und es gibt auch billiger Sachen von Taiwan.

    HAHA,12°C , cold weather is good for overclocking, I think coolaler will envies you very much!!

    I just think...if we can only get CPU type and frequency information from checksum now, then could we ignore the checksum when someone just wanna show other things such as FSB or RAM bandwidth?

    ja,nur 4 Monate...
    Ich moechte in Deutschland studieren...
    Aber...weil ich stomachache hatte...
    anyway, like Arnold Schwarzenegger said, I will be back! For a trip

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •