Originally Posted by Pedro Rocha
Yes he does - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8187151
Well done OPP, I'm sure when your get your hands into an FX55 or a FX53 that can go near 3.400Mhz, you will beat our score - no doubt!
Then we have to bench again, it is just a mater of time
Thats a very nice score, especially considering its "only" at 3180MHz. I see your using the tweaker now
As always OPP gets the absolute max out the GPU too ... 810 MHz
X800Pro class 3DMark01 : 36670
X800Pro class 3DMark03 : 16092
Ti4200 class 3Dmark01 No 1 : 22213
Super Pi 1M : S754 28 sec, FX53 25 sec
HEXUS Pifast : S754/Prom 40.55sec, FX53 36.92sec
Author of A64 Tweaker
Co-author of NF2 Tweaker
I think OPP's score puts things into perspective in regards to the phenominal system power of Ricky and Pedro's system.
182 Car High.
Good god thats insane.
Proud Founder of Redline 3D
Thats why I think itll be 6 months before anyone else beats Ricky and Pedro's 40k plus score. We will need 90nm san diago(1mb cache) for higher cpu clocks
3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!
9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
3dmark scores with older gpus
Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551
FX @ 3.4GHz is really mad machine
check out the bandwith....
http://69.93.183.37/802/26/upload/p674054.jpg
Uh, wow.
Proud Founder of Redline 3D
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks