Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567 LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 156

Thread: Prescott vs AMD64

  1. #101
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12
    Originally posted by Peen


    Please dont tell me u would tell ur mom to build a celeron over the 2500. it may be true it would serve ur mom fine, but the barton is much more future proof and stable
    Celeron does run at lower temps and is more stable... But as you said much more future proof

  2. #102
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12
    Originally posted by Peen
    Yes this is partly true, but if someone asks whats 3200 mean and they say that means it runs at 2.2ghz..... u sure thats all they would say? i think not.
    You think the INTEL store man is not going to want to sell a much more expensive CPU????

  3. #103
    2.4C killer
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,924
    ugh how can u say its more stable. Whats more stable then a 2500 never crashing i dont get it lol

  4. #104
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12
    Lets just settle that there equally as stable

  5. #105
    2.4C killer
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,924
    But, how is it less hassle?

    also, i highly doubt of a customer asked whats 3200 mean the salesman would say that means it runs at 2.2ghz. Hell my mom wouldnt beleive that BS

  6. #106
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,202
    i can fire up a few benches but i don't know what proggie to use? It has to be small in size so everyone can run it.

  7. #107
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Originally posted by QuadDamage
    i can fire up a few benches but i don't know what proggie to use? It has to be small in size so everyone can run it.
    Not quite sure what you are on about but maybe pifast would fit the bill , the hexus version.

    Regards

    Andy

  8. #108
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,202
    i was talking abot video encoding benches like someone suggested earlier

    anyways, ok lets see.

  9. #109
    2.4C killer
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,924
    Can you do UT2003?

  10. #110
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,202
    nope cos ATI's drivers don't work.

    btw, pifast is just over 51s in both cases.

  11. #111
    2.4C killer
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,924
    ahhh yeah forgot no one has those 64bit drivers, ill think of something else

  12. #112
    2.4C killer
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,924
    Oh wow, is there a 64bit F@H client yet? that would be killer!

  13. #113
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    center of hell
    Posts
    338
    no divx or benching tips here,NDA
    Last edited by Vlad Draculea; 05-14-2004 at 09:00 PM.

  14. #114
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,202
    Vlad,

    yeah i'll check this out. Now the good news i found a Gainward ti4600 and MSI FX5600 and 52.14 64 Bit dets. Not top of the range boards but at least i can bench 3D.

  15. #115
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    But vlad will that program take advantage of 64-bit at all?

    If its still the same 32-bit prog from before nothing is going to change.
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

  16. #116
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    center of hell
    Posts
    338
    my dna is over nda, also my arn, you cant have nada
    Last edited by Vlad Draculea; 05-14-2004 at 09:01 PM.

  17. #117
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    134
    Quad -- so nvidia's drivers work? If so I might have to slap my 5900U and test out Win64
    DFi LanParty UT | Athlon 64 3700+ | 1gb Mushkin Black Lvl 2 PC3500 | ATi Radeon X800XT-PE

  18. #118
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    maybe the codec pcmark2004 uses is already 64bit compatible?

  19. #119
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sheffield, UK
    Posts
    419
    Ive heard the cat 4.1's install on XP-64 has anyone tried?
    [Team CPUCITY] #6 Aircooled Athlon XP, 3D Mark 2001.

    AMD Barton XP2800+ AQUCA SPMW 0328 2.4 GHz @1.825V | SLK900U, Vantec 92mm & Nexus | DFI NFII Ultra Infinity w/Bios 12-17 alpha @1.60V | 2X256MB Mushkin Level II BH-5 240.5MHz 11-2-2-2,0-13-15 @3.30V | Sapphire R350 & VGA Silencer @440/380 | Enermax 460W EG465AX-VE (G) FMA | 21,321 - 24/7 Gaming OC


    3DMark 2001 SE = 22299 at 11x235MHz 11-2-2-2-2,0-9-12 w/NFII Ultra Infinity & R350 @ 459-390
    3DMark 2003 = 6878 at 10.5x240MHz 11-2-2-2-2,0-9-12 w/NFII Ultra Infinity & R350 @459-390
    AM3 = 51174 at 10.5x240MHz 11-2-2-2-2,0-9-12 w/NFII Ultra Infinity & R350 @459-390

  20. #120
    Xtremely Large Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Britland
    Posts
    1,944
    Originally posted by Albigger
    I don't think anyone would argue with you on that one (hence the lack of multiplier adjustments, etc...)
    I think it's more likely that they lock the multiplier to stop unscrupulous dealers selling remarked chips to be honest.

    AMD pretty much started locking the AthlonXP just after the remarked chips started doing the rounds.
    I've heard it all, I've seen it all, I've done it all. I just don't remember any of it.

    DFI LanParty UT NF3 | A-64 3200+ | 1Gb OCZ EL DDR PC-3500 Limited Edition
    Radeon X800XT | Audigy 2 | 2x WD 74Gb Raptors | 60Gb IBM | 20Gb Maxtor
    OCZ PowerStream 520w | Mach II GT Cooled

  21. #121
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    80
    Dfinitely waiting for more video encoding benchmarks.

  22. #122
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    The World
    Posts
    381
    here's a comparison between Quad's pic and mine i just ran:



    my rig is as it appears in my sig but at 2.3ghz (3000+) to match Quad's clockspeed. i'm using a NF3 150 2.5 3 3 5 timings in regular 32bit windows xp.

    Quad is running 2.3ghz (3200+ i think) on a K8V via chipset 2 2 2 6 in 64bit windows xp.

    this post was just to show the difference between 32bit windows and 64bit windows. even though its not the same system exactly the results are quite shocking! mid 60fps to 180fps just by changing OS's.
    Last edited by Maxvla; 02-04-2004 at 11:32 AM.
    A64 3200+ Newcastle 2.2ghz
    Asus K8V SE Deluxe
    2x512 Mushkin BH5
    Tyan Tachyon G9800pro
    NEC 8x DVDRW
    Liteon 52x CDRW
    2x160gb Maxtor 7200
    Chaintech AV710
    Lian Li v1000

  23. #123
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    195
    Originally posted by Peen
    2.6celeron 91 bucks
    2500 Barton 90 bucks.

    Please dont tell me u would tell ur mom to build a celeron over the 2500. it may be true it would serve ur mom fine, but the barton is much more future proof and stable
    Not to mention it only takes a Duron 1.6 GHz to beat the crap out of the Celeron 2.6 in gaming! See AnandTech budget CPU shootout, Unreal for example: Anand UT2003

    The AXP 2500+ beats the Celeron 2.6 GHz by 5-100 % in basically every gaming benchmark!
    Last edited by Pjotr; 02-04-2004 at 01:20 PM.
    Opteron 165 CCBWE 0550UPMW@2.5 GHz 1.3 V 1GB / A64 3500+ 512M / A64 3500+ 512M / AXP 2500+@400FSB 1GB / AXP 2500+@400FSB 512M / AXP 1700+@333FSB 256M / AXP 1700+@300FSB 256M / Athlon 1150 384M / Ferrari 3000 AXP 2500+ laptop

  24. #124
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    Posts
    183
    Yea, Celerons are horrible. Real bad. :/

    Look at how bad they scale to clock speed. Look at the 2.0GHz model compared to the 2.6GHz model, only like 15 fps more. 600MHz for 15 fps..

    Also, looks like Intel is real trouble , especially now that 64bit XP is out for DL. Holy crap those results are badass.
    AMD XP-M 2600+ @ 2.4GHz (12x200) - 1.75v
    DFI NFII Ultra Infinity Rev. A
    2x1GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC4000 @ 400MHz 2-2-2-5 - 2.8v
    BFG 7800GS @ 475/1550
    OCZ Powerstream 600W (+3.6, +5.4, +12.6)
    Swiftech MCX462-V-->92mm Tornado-->MCX159-A

    nForce UDP 5.10
    Forceware 97.44 XtremeG
    Win XP Home SP2

  25. #125
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    You guys look at all the other numbers though in comparison.....thats nothing to write home about.

    And look at the very last score...2436.557fps (32 bit) vs 560.618fps (64 bit)?
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •