Abit IP-35 Pro
Q6600 G0 @ 3.8ghz
8GB Corsair DDR2 8500
EVGA 8800GTX
FSP Sparkle Epsilon 700W
Dell 2407WFP
Well, from what I hear, what was shown at Computex was the B0 spin.
http://www.gearlog.com/2007/06/amds_..._and_disap.php
Groo said the same thing, B0, and he's the one who reported the B0 "miracle" for the Inq. DT said "latest revision".
Is there anything to indicate that what was at Computex was anything other than B0 silicon?
Abit IP-35 Pro
Q6600 G0 @ 3.8ghz
8GB Corsair DDR2 8500
EVGA 8800GTX
FSP Sparkle Epsilon 700W
Dell 2407WFP
From the link above
Back to Barcelona: DailyTech reported that partners were talking about speeds of 2.0-GHz. I didn't get that (I heard a "possibly 1.8-GHz at launch"), but we are still (unfortunately) talking about early silicon. What's known as the "B0" stepping is out, and the "B02" stepping should be available shortly, I was told.
Demolous why do you believe that B02 will hit 2.5ghz?
Isn't there more than just a scaling problem . If the 1 benchmark is correct. It doesn't matter if K10 scales to 3.3 it still is slower than Intel c2d.
So this new B02 has to fix more than just a scaling problem.
Now I have a question for ALL users. Everyone is saying that AMD needs to beat intel . So as to bring even lower prices. Intel didn't have to sell C2D at such low prices to start with. They had a better product . It is Intel who brought these lower prices not AMD as many are saying . If Amd k10 is better than C@D it well be back to higher prices again for AMD. But not Intel .
So if AMD leads in performance higher prices . If intel keeps the performance lead . lower prices.
Proven fact by history . Intel tries to maintain its margins. Ever time they do a new process we see lower prices . History shows this from the very Beginning.
The thing I don't get is why is it so important that AMD take the performance lead? Why can't Intel keep it? AMD won't just disappear. They are a value sector company thats all they will ever be. Whats wrong with that? So they had a batter come to the plate and hit a home run thats not the end of the game.
From what I have seen Intel leading in performance means lower prices . AMD leading in performance means higher prices. Now we could debate this till were blue in the face but history well show I speak the trueth.
One thing good that came out this week is this.
1. We know now why AMD showed only task manager in Dec.(AMD couldn't be honest with us. WHY?
2. AMDs dec report was a complete fabracation that cost investors millions of dollars . Why isn't someone going to jail for fraud. HECTOR
3. B0 had people dancing in the streets. More lies who is responsiable is unknown.
4 . May or june launch time . More lies who is responsable is again unknown .
5 , 1st half 07 release . Maybe true have to wait another 23 days to be another lie . AMD responsiable.
6. estimated performance figures . or should we just say it like it is . More lies from amd .
I don't care if your an Intel user or an Amd user. The lies that AMD has perpetraited in the last year is wrong and I believe taken as a whole because of stock movements was infact fraud screwing investors out of millions of dollars. Taken as a whole these lies = fraud . I for one am going to make sure its looked into and I have the $$ to do it. Hector should be like deported or something . I know if I met him on the sreet I would beat has ass to a pulp. The lieing piece of garbage
2. Bo stepping had people
Relax, people.
Like all software the first "runnable" versions are full of bugs. What's new?
One of the reasons that I have stayed with AMD for so long is due to its affordability. While I was given a Pentium computer in high school, I've always upgraded to an AMD processor (minus a brief flirtation with C2D, a nice proc to be sure). I relish the days when my dad and I would eagerly go to PC Club and I would spend $150-$200 or so on a new chip, motherboard, and maybe something else (like a case if needed). You can talk about price to performance ratios, and drops in prices, et al. In terms of affordability though, AMD has always been more accessible. As for drops in prices, those have taken place on both sides as competition warrants. If AMD leads in performance this time, I don't see how we can assume that higher prices will automatically ensue. Intel is still dropping prices on the Quad the 22nd of July, regardless of what happens on 10th of June. AMD is still going to have to price things carefully, and you can be sure that Intel is going to keep up a price war especially if they truly feel that AMD has low output do to its process tech.
Because thats what the roadmap for June 07 states. Its a snapshot of what AMD know they can deliver and so they may launch with a higher rated part, but its very very unlikely for it to be slower.
Just over a fortnight to go and then the gags are off us all. Unless something throws a spanner in.
Abit IP-35 Pro
Q6600 G0 @ 3.8ghz
8GB Corsair DDR2 8500
EVGA 8800GTX
FSP Sparkle Epsilon 700W
Dell 2407WFP
Come on guys, it's pretty obvious that AMD is just f**king with our heads. Haven't you all realized what they do when a new line of processors is supposed to be released? First few revisions are crap, everybody starts to think that their processors will be crap, clocked low, loads of bugs, then bam...final version kicks ass. Wait a few weeks to see what K10 really does. OR if Fugger ever gets to play with one, that could give us an idea.
Computer:
Case: Corsair 750D Airflow Edition
Mobo: Gigabyte Aorus X570 Ultra
RAM: Team TForce Xtreem ARGB 3600C14 2x16gb XMP
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5900x
Graphics: EVGA (rip) RTX 3080 FTW3
PSU: Seasonic Focus GX 850w
Cooling: Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360mm
NVMe: SKHynix P41 Platinum, Samsung 980 Pro 2tb
SSD: Micron 1100 2TB, Samsung 860 Evo 1tb
HDD: WD SE 2TB, WD Black 1tb 3 platter with over 10 years of power-on time
cmon fugger.... :P
look foward to results
Abit KN9-SLI
X2 3800+
1gb corsair pc5400
2 evga 7900gt
200gb maxtor sata
ocz 520w
heatware:althes
ebay althes
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
Originally Posted by Movieman
qft!Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
AMD to remain budget quad option then if < kentsfield.
i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz
Bookmarks