if that is 6x572 that's amazing performance increase
I WANT ONE
woah that's crazy 6x572FSB and 12m 20s 32M time!
---
what a ... intel has done perf nubmer is so crazy ~25000 if we translate it to 32M results it would be enough 5ghz for new WR compared to ~5.4ghz (present one) Also I see huge boost in 1m also.
Born to overclock
sounds like intels am2 messup
cool this will bring nice things for us in mid 08, early 09 I can see nice DDR3 costing the same as DDR2 today.
Current Setup:
-9850 GX2's in Quad SLI config
-Asus P5N32-SLI MB
-2x512mb of PC2-5300 DDR2
-Intel Celeron D OC'd to 3.2Ghz
-Windows Me with XP theme
-WD Caviar 20GB Hard Drive
-Zip drive
-Jazz drive
-3.5" floppy drive
-5.25" floppy drive
Nice numbers, but all lot of improvement needed in the future (which will happen for sure)
@ Andre: thanks for sharing
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.
Anyone notice that memory latency is even worse with the geil's at the higher speed and low latency as compared to the other ones with matching timings? Perhaps it's another asus+intel chipset bug like the p5b has with running trcd different? I guess the results aren't as bad as I'm sure a lot of us had been expecting, but it definitely does leave us with a lot more questions now. At least it's showing potential. If this means we can do 600fsb as the new 400fsb, with also ram at 4:5 750 or 1500 cas6, then it might not be so bad .
I'm assuming the memory latency jump at the 572fsb is poor due to more strap/internal latency adjustment like the p965's over 400. More testing will show!!
E8400 8x500=4000 | ABIT IP35-E
2x2GB Tracer PC2-6400 1:1 500MHz 5-5-5-15 2.0V
Galaxy 8800GT 800/2000/1100 1.3V | 80GB X25-M G2 + 1.5TB 7200.11 | XFiXG
Fuzion | MCW60 | DDC2+Petra | Coolrad22T+BIP1
Merom 13x133=1733 1MB L2 0.950V
wonder when intel is gonna break out of the stoneages and put mch on the processor
Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)
thanks for sharing the first results really looking forward for an one-on-one ddr2 vs. ddr3 shooutout
| '12 IvyBridge - "ticks different"... | AwardFabrik IvyBridge round I by SoF | AwardFabrik IvyBridge round II by angoholic & stummerwinter
| '11 The SandyBridge madness... | AwardFabrik / Team LDK OC-Season 2011/2012 Opening Event
| '10 Gulftown LaunchDay OC round up @ASUS RIIE | 3DM05 2x GPU WR LIVE @Cebit 2010 @ASUS MIIIE | SandyBridge arrived @ASUS P8P67
| '09 Foxconn Avenger | E8600 | Foxconn A79A-S | Phenom II 940 BE | LaunchDay Phenom II OC round up
| '08 7.438s 1m LN2 | AMD 1m WR LN2 | 2nd AOCM | Phenom II teasing
| '07 100% E2140 | 106.5% E2160 | 100% E4500 | 103% E4400 | 5508 MHZ E6850 | 7250 MHZ P4 641 126.5% by SoF and AwardFabrik Crew all on Gigabyte DS3P c? and LN2...
| '06 3800+ X2 Manchester 0531TPEW noHS 3201MHZ c? | 3200+ Venice noHS 3279MHZ c? | Opteron 148 0536CABYE 3405MHZ c? all on Gigabyte K8NXP-SLI compressorcooled
| '05 3500+[NC], 3000+[W], 2x 3200+[W], 3500+[NC], 3200+[V] 0516GPDW
Originally Posted by saaya
Of course with an IMC you then get that say DDR4 comes out it is a requirement to upgrade, where as here you get the choice.
Nothing to stop them creating an IMC with support for one memory technology, I believe that Barcelona has DDR2 and DDR3 support in one IMC, but if you look at Conroe/Kentsfield there are currently boards available that support DDR, DDR2 and soon DDR3 all with one CPU. You simply don't get that flexibility with an IMC.
Holy
My bank account isn't going to like this.....
Have a nice day
QX9650 ES - 1M @7,984 sec - Asus Maximus Formula SE - LN2
E6600 - 1M @9,937 sec - Asus Maximus Formula SE - LN2
E6600 - 1M @10,016 sec - LN2
E6600 @ 4100mhz AIR -1M 12,500sec
E6600 @ 4285mhz AIR validation
OCZ PC8000 @ 684mhz 5-5-5-15 1M
http://www.overklokken.info --> THE dutch overclocking website.
Show us, how much faster you can do 32m @3400mhz with your ddr2 memory . You are speaking nonsenses, or you are not common with ddr3 standard and architecture improvements, as producers are roughly speaking cl7 ddr3 would be equal to cl5 ddr2 @same frequency So when you know that, tell us, how far you have to push ddr2 to match ddr3 1430mhz 6-7-6-15 speeds Let me guess, you'll start "DDR2 800mhz club"
BTW: Great pictures and tests Andre 10x for sharing them with the community, waiting 3d numbers
Last edited by DStealth; 05-03-2007 at 09:30 PM.
P67B3 SB D2@5.1G_1.47v :bow: SA PSC GF110 SSDS SPI-6.79 06-37580 Vantage-P36245
If life gives you a computer...OVERCLOCK IT! :yoda:
700MHz+ with the very first retailing ICs?!?!
Imagine how far this thing will go... DDR3-2000+ could certainly be reachable once there's a wider selection of chips out there. You know we don't know that IMC = CB. It's just speculation.
Infact, it's worth noting that prior to D0-stepping A64s there was no coldbug.
You were not supposed to see this.
Those are some great numbers but I think I'll skip first generation ddr3 and chipsets for ddr3.
My wallet can't handle the trauma.
CPU: Q6600 @ 3.6ghz G0 Week 37B
Mobo: Asus P5k Deluxe
Cooler: TRUE 120 (150cfm Delta)
2xHR-05
2xHR-09
Mem: G.Skill 4x1Gb 6400HZ
Vid: HIS 4850
HDD: 80Gb 16mb Cache Raptor
500Gb 7200.11 Seagate
PSU: Enermax Noisetaker 600w
Case: Thermaltake Armor (4x120mm 104CFM Panaflo)
3dmark06: 16k
Andre PLEASE clear up with us all whether that 32M run was using 6x or 7x multi
dinos looks stressed
It must be 7x otherwise there would be much more attention Also you can calculate latency and see that 715Mhz CL6 is not enough for such mega speed at 6x
Last edited by kiwi; 05-23-2007 at 02:25 AM.
...
Bookmarks