ZOMG, so it IS true!!!! I knew it.
ZOMG, so it IS true!!!! I knew it.
If I had to guess based on that article, I would have to say it is the Uber1337MeGaZuperAzzemo9000000000Originally Posted by Vapor
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
i call
Workstation:
3960X | 32GB G.Skill 2133 | Asus Rampage IV Extreme
3*EVGA GTX580 HC2 3GB | 3*Dell U3011
4*Crucial M4 256GB R0 | 6*3TB WD Green R6
Areca 1680ix-24 + 4GB | 2*Pioneer BDR-205 | Enermax Plat 1500W
Internal W/C | PC-P80 | G19 | G700 | G27
Destop Audio:
Squeezebox Duet | Beresford TC-7520 Caiman modded | NAD M3 | MA RX8 | HD650 | ATH-ES7
Man Cave:
PT-AT5000E | TXP65VT30 | PR-SC5509 | PA-MC5500 | MA GX300*2, GXFX*4, GXC350 | 2*BK Monolith+
Gaming on the go:
Alienware M18x
i7 2920XM | 16GB DDR3 1600
2*6990 | WLED 1080P
2*Crucial M4 256GB | BD-RW
BT 375 | Intel 6300 | 330W PSU
2011 Audi R8 V10 Ibis White ABT Tuned - 600HP
i didnt even go and fully read the tech data or compaire the x1950 and 8800 scores he had with that of other reviews.Originally Posted by Cybercat
it is simply the mix of unknown hardware site with a load of google adds and a site that looks more like a blog.
also wierd that i cant find a single other review on the site.
so ya maybe its real and the guy simply wants to keep his name safe (nda) but maybe its just a trick to get cash cause just think of the traffic hes getting and the amount of adds.
i nvr trust info if i dont trust the one that it is coming from. if this info however came from a site i trust or a forum member i trust it would b a lil more believable.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Groucho Marx
i know my grammar sux so stop hitting me
I'm staking no claim to how legit this article is, but the numbers do seem real enough, granted some numbers from released cards look screwy. As someone else mentioned, before R520 there were some (one that was incredibly notable) fake previews...So who knows. GDDR3 then GDDR4 does sound realistic, more-so than Hexus' statement about GDDR4 first, with the GDDR3 XL to follow a month or two later. While it's all conjecture, at least the wheels are finally turning in the process leading to release.
With all due love and respect, let me say it again: DX10.1 spec is finalized, and has been for a long time. When looking back on what ATi wanted in DX10, they mention many aspects that will be supported in DX10.1, some of which (like 4x AA) is already seen on a certain gaming console made by the same company whom creates DX that uses a gfx chip by the aforementioned, so I don't doubt they had some hand in influencing the spec and could have early support for it. The article, FWIW, states it supports DX10.1:Originally Posted by DilTech
Draft = version/revision. 10.1 is an updated draft of DX10, and there will undoubtedly be DX10.2 or 10.1a. While it may not be the best verbiage (verbage perhaps in this case) on the author's part, it should not be mistaken for partially supporting dx10.1, as obviously that's a big nono. He's saying it will, granted he may be full of poo and just reaping a bundle of money on adsense.Originally Posted by level505
Last edited by turtle; 12-30-2006 at 04:10 PM.
That is all.
Peace and love.
There´s ad on this page? Oh, damm AdBlock Plus
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
Sorry I can't see what you are saying, I think it's my ad blockerOriginally Posted by w0mbat
You can do that whit X1600Pro.yea, but some ppl need to play oblivion now lol.
I doubt that, are you saying that M$ cheated on nVidia whit ATi? - those consoles don't go by the same DX that you see on a PC (No WinVista OS there), you might have seen some specifications related to DX10.1 - that could be true since M$ released a brief on their project, but you won't see the full specifications - it needs more brushing, if not in Q2 maybe in Q3 or even Q4 - you see how things or moving whit Win Vista, on the other hand we might see some DX10.1 specifications included in DX10, just as DX9 releases a new Build each month (DX9c November, October, December).With all due love and respect, let me say it again: DX10.1 spec is finalized, and has been for a long time. When looking back on what ATi wanted in DX10, they mention many aspects that will be supported in DX10.1, some of which (like 4x AA) is already seen on a certain console made by the same company whom creates DX with a chip by the aforementioned, so I don't doubt they had some hand in influencing the spec and could have early support for it. The article, FWIW, states it supports DX10.1:
OT maybe but is it 100% sure that DX10.1 needs need hardware ?
As I stated before, the ads are numerous
In short, both AMD and NVIDIA discovered that their next-generation graphics cards are superior to each others' last-generation graphics cards.
They have done it before (9700 remember?) ATi has long had good business Ties with M$, so it would make sense for M$ to favor them.Originally Posted by XSAlliN
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
2 isn't a square; this should says 2^n not x^2.Originally Posted by ownage
Originally Posted by Ket
You're right, consoles do not use the same form of DX, but who wants to bet the API for XBOX360 uses some features that will be found in dx10.1? 4x AA is implemented on all games, just like the spec for dx10.1. True enough it's dx9-based, but I digress.
I'm not saying they're in bed with them. I'm saying there is features used in Xenos that will become spec for DX10.1. Perhaps it just a huge coincidence...
Wavey has mentioned numerous times when discussing this topic that support for something does not mean it needs to be implemented the same way on all products. What I took that to mean is if M$ has set requirements for DX10.1 (which they have), it can be supported pre-release if they plan for the specs.
It's not unheard of for features to be supported before final release of an API. Doesn't anyone remember the 9700pro coming out BEFORE dx9? 9700pro was in August 02, DX9 was December 02. That's a 4 months gap, probably less than 10->10.1, and a much more difficult switch...But the same type of deal. If the requirements are set, the IHV's can support the features. The API is created to use those features.
As for DX10.1 being a part of DX10 initial release or quickly afterwards (or not), any of those are surely possible. Like I've said before, last I heard from MS is that they planned to get it out the door PDQ after DX10, but of course things change.
EDIT: Yes dx10.1 needs hardware, as it has to support WDDM 2.1 (context switching and page fault improvement), and such over dx10. It could be done through the driver if the GPU is able, but it has to be something considered when designing the GPU. A lot of the spec does seem essentially to make the API easier and more efficient to use rather than actual new features, but there are a couple of additions that require the hardware to be improved design-wise over what is acceptable for DX10. At least, it looks that way to me. This article is still a good source of information.
..and for once, I agree with nn_step.
Last edited by turtle; 12-30-2006 at 04:58 PM.
That is all.
Peace and love.
Indeed, gotta love it if you're a cheap gamer (Although the $200 7950GT is tempting)Originally Posted by Soulburner
i3-8100 | GTX 970
Ryzen 5 1600 | RX 580
Assume nothing; Question everything
can anyone tell when that NDA expires ?
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=5524
Seems DailyTech contacted site owner so numbers might be good.
AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
MSI 890GXM-G65
Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
Sapphire HD 6950 2GB
hmm I'm a little more tempted by the $145 x1900GT or the $199 X1900XT, esp once you take in the F@H scores and the benefit that it can doOriginally Posted by Kingcarcas
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
That is correct, that is if (which i doubt very much) this article is any much more than a hoax to get ppl all worked up for this card which (mark my words wont surpass G80 in dx9 benches) to stop buyin g80 and to hold out till Q1 -jan -feb.Originally Posted by Cybercat
Also if u hav a g80, do u hav a fully compatible drivers for this monster? cuz if u do send me a link as i asure u that g80 is also kind-of currently in the present stage as R600 is in, much even to think of vista and dx10 benches. For the reputation ATI/AMD has i think u'll be in a 6-10 month wait for a mature drivers!!! so go ahead get ur R600 and watch current and refresh g80 kill that sun of a gun!!! G80 rocks!!!
Last edited by dejavuxx; 12-30-2006 at 05:30 PM.
Crymera
Intel Quad Core Q6600 @3Ghz /artic silver ceramic, Zalman9700NT, MSI P6N Diamond mobo, Corsair XMS 4Gb Kit PC6400 @1066, 150Gb Raptor, 500Gb PR Hitachi, Pioneer 122D, Samsung SH-S183L, TT TP 700W Modular, TT Armor +25cm fan, Dell SP2008WFP LCD Monitor!
Vista Ultimate 64-bit/XP 32-bit
CRYSIS READY!!
Indeed².Originally Posted by Kingcarcas
I'm hoping rv660/670 actually hit in the summer, and don't get delayed like the former gen refresh. Here's hoping rv610/rv630 come out without problems, as they'll prolly weave the tale of how ATi transitions to 65nm...and something I can actually see myself buying.
Here's hoping the cheap(er) high-end cards in the fall still have enough bang to power 1600x1200 (1680x1050) on whatever is out around then, and daamit, they better have GDDR4.
Come to think of it...That's a whole lot of hoping.
Last edited by turtle; 12-30-2006 at 05:42 PM.
That is all.
Peace and love.
Originally Posted by AbelJemka
Well it would seem the results are likely bias'd, we'll just have to wait and see I guess.
"If Level505's comments seem a little too pro-ATI, don't be too surprised. When asked if the site was affiliated in any way to ATI or AMD, the owner replied to DailyTech with the statement that "two staff members of ours are directly affiliated with AMD's business [development] division."
Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810
Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830
AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
Corsair VX450
yea, i wonder how long till one of those happens again...maybe the 8800gt will prove to be somewhat of a bargainOriginally Posted by Kingcarcas
DFI P965-S/core 2 quad q6600@3.2ghz/4gb gskill ddr2 @ 800mhz cas 4/xfx gtx 260/ silverstone op650/thermaltake xaser 3 case/razer lachesis
Well, the guy updated the webpage about those numbers and autencity.
http://level505.com/2006/12/30/the-full-ati-r600-test/
Its on the first page.
Real of fake, time will tell.
4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11 (one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)
That's why Bill Gates gave us the gift of Paint.We are not publishing pictures of the card itself right now, as the card contains major ID tags that we can not remove yet for source protection
Fancy that. Site is down now.
-
"Language cuts the grooves in which our thoughts must move" | Frank Herbert, The Santaroga Barrier
2600K | GTX 580 SLI | Asus MIV Gene-Z | 16GB @ 1600 | Silverstone Strider 1200W Gold | Crucial C300 64 | Crucial M4 64 | Intel X25-M 160 G2 | OCZ Vertex 60 | Hitachi 2TB | WD 320
and the site is down, very questionably early
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
Bookmarks