http://www.theinq.com/default.aspx?article=34247
I've get a Core2Duo this month
http://www.theinq.com/default.aspx?article=34247
I've get a Core2Duo this month
conroe still beat the AMD
retired computer enthusiast
i knew when i clicked on this post someone was going to say this.Originally Posted by Supertim0r
Originally Posted by Supertim0r
then why done't u stick to the intel section
reallly guys try to avoid following ur needs for a flamware in every thread
Soon to be :
ASUS P8P67 Deluxe, Intel SB i7-2600k, G.Skill Rj-X F3-12800CL6D-4GBXH, MSI HD6950 2GB, Corsair 750AX, Intel 80GB G2 SSD, DELL U2410
Used to be: SaFrOuT
i guess you know how well 65nm is gonna clock then?Originally Posted by Supertim0r
Got a fan over those memory sticks? No? Well get to it before you kill them
Seems like there are some Intel guys that are :banana::banana::banana::banana: faced... Some dont even have a "conroe", but they wont hesitate to let you know conroe is all powerful. I was reading some stuff in there yesterday, and some Intel guys ragged on this guy because he had a question. Mind you, I didnt post in the intel section, I JUST READ. Matter a fact. I think when K8L comes out and dominates Intel. We should go over to Intel forums and then tell them how much Intel sucks.. What do you guys think?
~Mike
Main Rig: Intel Core i7 7700k @ 4.2GHz, 64GB of memory, 512GB m.2 SSD, nVidia GTX1080Ti
NAS: QNAP TVS-1282, 8 x 4TB WD Golds(Main Storage Pool), 4 x 960GB M4 Crucial (VM Storage) , 2 x 512GB M.2 Caching
Private Cloud: 4 Nodes (2 x Xeon 5645, 48GB DDR3 ECC/REG, 1 x 1TB HDD, 1 x 960GB SSD/Each)
Distributed Encoding Cloud: 4 Nodes (2 x Xeon x5690, 24GB DDR3 ECC/REG, 1 x 128GB SSD/Each)
Feedback
EBAY:HEAT
there are already some 65nm benchs out there, same thing as am2 on 90nm regarding performance.Originally Posted by ozzimark
so amd will need 3.4GHz to beat conroe x6800XE (maybe a bit more dependeing on the game/bench) + it needs to have more space to oc because a xe can easily go to 3.6GHz.
still good news that AMD is doing things fast to reduce the performance gap
it will definitely be interesting to see. i've gotta try to save up a bit of money to pick up one of those 65nm guys when they come out.
Got a fan over those memory sticks? No? Well get to it before you kill them
bleh, i'm not a Intel fanboy. Just performance fanboy. I would have a via if it was faster. Some people can't admit Intel is faster now. Back on topic now. Yes, I'll buy a 65nm amd when its available. Even if it's not faster. No fanboyism here
retired computer enthusiast
I hope in December X2 3800+ 65nm will be available in my country cause I'm definitely buying it, only problem is that I'm afraid that shops wouldn't separate 65 form 90nm, unless if there will be difference in price, what do you guys think?
DFI ICFX3200 07/30 w/ MCW30
E6600 L632A407 w/ EK Supreme
Powercolor HD3870 w/ MCW60
OCZ Reaper 2x2GB CAS4
WD Caviar Black 1TB
Silverstone Strider 750W
MM U2-UFO Extended CYO
CPU & NB loop = PA120.3, DDC 18W w/ Petra's top, 7/16''
VGA loop = PA120.2, DDC 18W w/ Petra's top, 7/16''
10 fans on 7V, PX-750A, all on SM 930BF
" Having a DFI board is like having a hot girlfriend thats a total b1tch" ...
smoke and mirrors...
If its originally planned for December release, it should already be shipping out from the fabs to the backend assembly plants right now.
Die shrinks will grant around 10-15% perfromance increase, so power to AMD. But it's not going to be anywhere close to Intel though.
I am just hoping AMD's marketing won't do some dumb pricing and keep 65nm 3800+ X2 at the same price as the 90nm parts, and Dell and HP better not suck up all of AMD's capacity.
Athlon 64 3200+ | ASUS M2A-VM 0202 | Corsair XMS2 TWIN2X2048-6400 | 3ware 9650SE 4LPML | Seasonic SS-380HB | Antec Solo
Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0GHz | ASUS P5WDG2-WS Pro 1001 | Gigabyte 4850HD Silent | G.Skill F2-6400PHU2-2GBHZ | Samsung MCCOE64G5MPP-0VA SLC SSD | Seasonic M12 650 | Antec P180
Core i7-2600K @ 4.3 GHz @ 1.30V | ASUS P8P67 Pro | Sparkle GTX 560 Ti | G.Skill Ripjaw X F3-12800CL8 4x4GB @ 933MHz 9-10-9-24 2T | Crucial C300 128GB | Seasonic X750 Gold | Antec P183
http://img.oc.com.tw/b60799/20069511501413494030192.jpg <--from [H]
Are there any other ES's out at all, I have heard rumers of ones in Japan, but all I have seen is this ^ and one other site with a few pics of one(could be the same proc.).
I think that a 65nm AMD could hit 3.4-3.5, maybe better since the 90nm ones are hitting 2.9-3.0. We can't really tell though until they come out how they will clock. Like you said, I don't think they will beat a extreme OCed Conroe, but they might close the gap, maybe even close it a lot faster than some people thought. Although they could also have a lower thermal envelope, be clocked the same as the 90nm chips, and still for some reason have a 3.0ghz wall; that would be a bummer huh. I would love to see these come out though and all of a sudden see some AMD's hitting 4ghz.so amd will need 3.4GHz to beat conroe x6800XE (maybe a bit more dependeing on the game/bench) + it needs to have more space to oc because a xe can easily go to 3.6GHz.
I am interested to see the quad core K8's. I know that they won't touch Kentsfield, that is K8L's job (hopefully), but it is nice to know that AMD seems to be on track with 65nm and quad core. Maybe if we see 65nm next month we will see K8L duals in early (like Jan. and Feb.) 07; better still I would love to see AMD to a quiet little sneaky release at like Christmass or something, doubt it will happen, but I can dream.
I just hope that this 65nm AMD does clock good and cause a little unrest in the Intel camps. I am tired of the flaming. I am not saying that Conroe isn't awsome, it is, I have considered getting one. There is also no denying that AMD may not touch Conroe until K8L, 65nm really might be to little to late. There is still no need for the flame and the hate. I have no problem with teaseing and pokeing, but some places (not at XS persay) it has gotten out of control. We are all the same, we just make choices, there really is no need for extreme fanboyism and hate/super flaming.
That said I can't wait to see what Big Green has in store for us in the coming months. I can't deny that I don't like AMD, again though I can't deny that Intel is kind of, well, stomping them right now in performance. I think Green will bounce back, and I think they will bounce back in a big way. Besides in a way Conroe users should welcome 65nm and K8L, because competion is what fuels this industry and I hope that K8L and Kentsfield can push it to the edge once more.
AMD 65nm + S939 ???
If they do release S939 parts, then it will have to be good news. Otherwize it's sad news for my DFI Lanparty and DDR1 memory. When you look at what happened with S754, AMD did release a Venice for that socket. So, I don't see why they wouldn't release the new 65nm chips.
i7 920 batch 3844A509 @ 3600 / TT BigTyphoon VX / ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 / G.SKILL 6gb @ 1600 8-8-8-21 / Sapphire Radeon HD4850 / TT ToughPower 600w / Samsung Spinpoint F1 750gb x2 / WD2500KS x2 / LG DVD-rw x2
<<<<<CLICK HERE IF YOU NEED REAL-TIME VIDEO CLIPS>>>>>
Could be better wait for a second revision of 65nm(like Venice over Winchester)...
I'm guessing with the 65nm process 3ghz or less is the fastest K8 chip we will see. I'm pretty sure that if AMD will have something to compete with Conroe performance wise it will not be untill K8L. The only reason AMD is pushing 65nm is for budget CPU's and later on for K8L. Not for an increase in clockspeed anytime soon.
65nm is nice for people looking for reasonable performance at an amazing price though
Blue Dolphin Reviews & Guides
Blue Reviews:
Gigabyte G-Power PRO CPU cooler
Vantec Nexstar 3.5" external HDD enclosure
Gigabyte Poseidon 310 case
Blue Guides:
Fixing a GFX BIOS checksum yourself
98% of the internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that isn't an emo bastard, copy and paste this into your sig.
Reading this, it is inevitable that AMD will just forget about S939. If so, well I know where my money will go for my next system .
The slide here clearly states the new chip will be for AM2 (DDR2). So let's not keep our hopes up for the S939, it's in the trash (read garbage) bin at AMD.
i7 920 batch 3844A509 @ 3600 / TT BigTyphoon VX / ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 / G.SKILL 6gb @ 1600 8-8-8-21 / Sapphire Radeon HD4850 / TT ToughPower 600w / Samsung Spinpoint F1 750gb x2 / WD2500KS x2 / LG DVD-rw x2
<<<<<CLICK HERE IF YOU NEED REAL-TIME VIDEO CLIPS>>>>>
maybe instead of getting a conroe i'll just get a $50 sempron and a good $200 mobo and wait?
I would just get a Conroe box now. It's pretty much a given that all the 65nm parts will be in extremely limited availability and will be marked up worse than Conroe at launch.Originally Posted by serious1
BTW, 939 is officially EoL. Stop having wet dreams about 65nm s939 parts. It aint going to happen.
Athlon 64 3200+ | ASUS M2A-VM 0202 | Corsair XMS2 TWIN2X2048-6400 | 3ware 9650SE 4LPML | Seasonic SS-380HB | Antec Solo
Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0GHz | ASUS P5WDG2-WS Pro 1001 | Gigabyte 4850HD Silent | G.Skill F2-6400PHU2-2GBHZ | Samsung MCCOE64G5MPP-0VA SLC SSD | Seasonic M12 650 | Antec P180
Core i7-2600K @ 4.3 GHz @ 1.30V | ASUS P8P67 Pro | Sparkle GTX 560 Ti | G.Skill Ripjaw X F3-12800CL8 4x4GB @ 933MHz 9-10-9-24 2T | Crucial C300 128GB | Seasonic X750 Gold | Antec P183
yea let s939 r.i.p; change is a good thing. I cant wait for some 65nm benchmarks to come.
For all your cooling needs: ShopPTS.com
System:
Rampage Formula // E8400 @ 4.0 (1.28v)
4x 1GB Ballistix Tracer @ 600 (5-5-5-15)
4x 74GB Raptors 16MB Raid-0 // Samsung F1 1TB
eVGA 8800GTS 512MB @ 800/1111/2000
Corsair HX620 // LG246WP
Cooling:
D-TEK FuZion // PA120.3 // 3x Yate Loon SH
MCW60GT // EK Multi-150 // DDC-2 + Petra's Top
i want 65nm on my infinity
yes..the bad new is that 939 is dying ...
Going from 0.18 micron to 0.13 micron eventually got AMD an increase of 600 MHz in production processors, on a similar architecture. That's the fastest Palomino, the 1.73 GHz 2100XP through to the fastest Barton, the 2.33 GHz 3300XP. That's over a 1/3rd increase in clockspeed through process changes. It didn't happen overnight obviously, given that the Thoroughbred A came first, then the Thoroughbred B, then finally the Barton. But it was still quite an increase. 0.13 micron went as fast as 2.4 GHz if you count the Athlon 64s and Opterons, but that was a whole new architecture.
Going from 0.13 micron to 0.09 micron got AMD an increase of 600 MHz - from the Athlon 64 3700/3800/4000 at 2.4 GHz to the Opteron 256/856 at 3 GHz. Not as much this time, but still 25%. Again, it didn't happen immediately, there was the revision D processors (basically Winchester) before we got to the revision E chips (Venice, San Diego, Troy etc).
So using previous form, I expect rev F - the 0.065 micron processors - to get to around 3.75 GHz, in production processors. Given that there has always been overclockers who have managed another couple hundred megahertz out of the chips, I see 4 GHz being plausible. It may take another revision to get to that stage, but I do see it happening. Funnily enough, in talking to some process engineers, we reckoned AMD would get about 3.8 GHz from a die shrink, and that was before we did the quick arithmetic.
In light of that, Intel likely will remain top dog since they have headroom with Conroe. But AMD are at least going to be competitive again, and on performance, not just price. Not that they really care if the relatively few enthusiasts have been lost to Intel, they are still selling everything they can make and that is before counting the Dell sales.
3.75GHz in prduction processors wont happend anytime soon.Originally Posted by Biggles
90nm on air get to 3100mhz and that is with a 3-4 year old process with like 4-5 revision of cpus and a better socket.
I'm just looking to get a 3ghz plus chip on air that consumes less than 100 watts. I'll be happy.
Originally Posted by ozzimark
Thanks for the update.
AMD lost its crown, did anyone else not know this?
DFI CFX3200
Opty 180 at 2730
XP-90C W/92mm Tornado
2X1024 G.Skill HX
Silverstone 520
Powercolor X1900XTX
what update did ozzimark give besides the ambiguous wink smilieOriginally Posted by Raybo
Bookmarks