Yeah, it makes you wonder. Why would mobo vendors not put it as an option, even at Cas 2 on enthusiasts boards despite there being high end DDR2 sticks on market for a while now.Originally Posted by ZX7891
Yeah, it makes you wonder. Why would mobo vendors not put it as an option, even at Cas 2 on enthusiasts boards despite there being high end DDR2 sticks on market for a while now.Originally Posted by ZX7891
Signature? are you kidding? with new stuff coming out every day, why bother ?
oh sweet jebus
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
If it's really CAS 1, it's a slow CAS 1. (I couldn't get any 2's to complete 8M)Originally Posted by sierra_bound
Only beatable by 0-0-0-0........
Previous system:
DFI NF4 ULTRA 0453A3 KOREA CHIPSET / BIOS 510-2FIX / FX-57 0516WPMW@3.62GHZ / 2x256 CORSAIR 3200LLPT BH-5@13x278MHZ 2-2-2-5@3.69VDIMM / MACH II GT@MOD BY BERKUT / ACTIVE COOLING FOR RAM - MOSFETS - GPU RAM / CHIPSET & GPU CORE WATERCOOLED / OCZ POWERSTEAM 600W / BUILT BY ATI X850XT@660/651 - VGPU@1.73-VDD@2.26-VDDQ@2.21 PENCIL MOD / WIN XP 2x80GB SAMSUNG SPINPOINT SP80 SATA - RAID 0 & WIN 2K 40GB SAMSUNG SPINPOINT SP40 IDE BENCH DRIVE / PIC
----------------><------------------
I thought that nothing below cas 3 could be chosen for ddr 2 ram? I'm very skeptical about this. We need some more tests and some input from
... But who has the guts to challenge Kyosen in a tweakin' contest? - I know I dont
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
Good point, not sure how I missed that when I was checking out timing from that image.
Intel 9990XE @ 5.1Ghz
ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
GTX 2080 ti Galax Hall of Fame
64GB Galax Hall of Fame
Intel Optane
Platimax 1245W
Intel 3175X
Asus Dominus Extreme
GRX 1080ti Galax Hall of Fame
96GB Patriot Steel
Intel Optane 900P RAID
not even possible is it, i mean core 2 doesnt even have HT does it? (archetecture wise)Originally Posted by DilTech
im scared about ht coming back
i asked around and some one told it wouldnt help with such a short pipeline in c2d because it would ad latency.
i think that i remember hearing from somewhere that ht will return eventually, but i think that in this case its just a nforce 4 bug.
Core i7 920 3849B028 4.2ghz cooled by ek hf | 6gb stt ddr3 2100 | MSI HD6950 cf cooled by ek fc | Evga x58 e760 Classified | 120gb G.Skill Phoenix Pro | Modded Rocketfish case + 1200w toughpower | mcp 655 pump + mcr 320 + black ice pro II
I wanna see latency tests. Cool, HT... again...
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
I don't know if it has been said before, but CAS below 3 on DDR2 is technically impossible.
Blue Dolphin Reviews & Guides
Blue Reviews:
Gigabyte G-Power PRO CPU cooler
Vantec Nexstar 3.5" external HDD enclosure
Gigabyte Poseidon 310 case
Blue Guides:
Fixing a GFX BIOS checksum yourself
98% of the internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that isn't an emo bastard, copy and paste this into your sig.
I can understand that you can't believe my P5NSLI results...
...at first I also couldn't believe my eyes
But these are simple facts that P5NSLI has CL1 setting and
that I can set CL1-1T with Corsair 5400UL, without any difficulties.
Several screenshots are here:
http://www.oohashi.jp/c-board/c-boar...ne;no=4798;id=
Anyway, as Gautam says, this P5NSLI is VERY SLOW even if running at CL1.
There is no reason to choose P5NSLI...except formal SLI support, I think
Fair enough, and nice work in trying out some very unusual parameters...but, if your eyes can believe that, can they also believe this?
Corsair 5400UL 1.2 at stock vdimm.
CPU-Z and BIOS cannot always be trusted...
Hahaha, interesting, Gautam
> CPU-Z and BIOS cannot always be trusted...
--
But if BIOS setting and CPU-Z(or any software) showing are same,
and if benchmark scores vary according to BIOS setting,
I have no way to certify that they are false.
I don't know whether P5NSLI's CL1 is "real" CL1 or not,
but at least it's not same as CL3
Bookmarks