Allendale e6500es on gigabyte ds3 mobo results

[don_vercetti]

Could the FSB on the e6300 ever get as high as a e6500 in OC condition?

All else the same, it would get higher, as the E6300 has a lower multiplier so assuming all else the same, when they hit a cpu ceiling (assuming they hit it at the same time) the E6300 would have a higher FSB than the E6500.

[Phosphate]

All else the same, it would get higher, as the E6300 has a lower multiplier so assuming all else the same, when they hit a cpu ceiling (assuming they hit it at the same time) the E6300 would have a higher FSB than the E6500.

Made a typo. I might to say e4300 (not e6300). So could a e4300 clock as high as an e6500 as far as FSB goes? Remembering they both have 9x multipliers.

[Lestat]

Still need a floppy disk for that...

do you own one of these boards ? horrorwood ? RTFM kiddo,,
qflash can use the following
floppy
cdrom
usb flash drive

go into the bios and hit F9 and go to town man
just burn it to a cdr or rw.

[Lestat]

266 is 1066 FSB call it whatever you want but its not one of the lower models.
its a 9x multi with 1066 fsb and 2mb L2

[don_vercetti]

Made a typo. I might to say e4300 (not e6300). So could a e4300 clock as high as an e6500 as far as FSB goes? Remembering they both have 9x multipliers.

Well yeah, it would clock exactly the same assuming that both CPU clock equally well. Once you had the E4300 at 9x266 it would be a E6500 (minus virtualization of course), and beyond that it would be exactly the same as the E6500.

[horrorwood]

Yeah that would be stock but I'm talking comparing benchmarks OC'd. That e4300 should have a lot of potential for a fat OC because of that 9x multipier. (at least that is what I am thinking assuming RAM was good enough)

Could the FSB on the e4300 ever get as high as a e6500 in OC condition? ( post editted from e6300)

Depends. e4300's could be the chips that are failing to run at higher speeds.

So they could be dud's.

[onethreehill]

I thought that the E6500 was an E6400 with 2MB L2 cache that is slated for release in the fourth quarter.

You meant the E6500 was an E6600 with 2MB L2 cache, no?

E6400 2.13GHz/2MB L2
E6500 2.4GHz/2MB L2
E6600 2.4GHz/4MB L2

[horrorwood]

How many times has this been said now.

E6500 is E6600 with 2mb cache instead of 4mb

NOW STFU!