Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 134

Thread: Just sharing a CPU-Z of Intel Core 2 Duo E4300

  1. #51
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    457
    he's a faker and the screenshot is faked, noone has a E4300, only Intel has so far and unless he's leaking secret intel stuff I don't think we'll get another reply from him.

  2. #52
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Posts
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by Cappie
    he's a faker and the screenshot is faked, noone has a E4300, only Intel has so far and unless he's leaking secret intel stuff I don't think we'll get another reply from him.
    ever thought about visiting a psychiatrist?

  3. #53
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    Quote Originally Posted by erwinz
    hey man any news..
    no news on supply from my guy
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  4. #54
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Angeles City, Philippines
    Posts
    133
    hi guys,

    i think its best that we give DM some time.

    heres what he said today on the other forum


    Heya guys, I'll try to post updates, maybe OC updates, but just CPU-Z screenie.

    Too busy lately, no time to play...
    Intel E6300 L927 @ 3.4ghz w/ Infinity
    Asus P5B Deluxe 0910
    Corsair 6400C5 2X512
    Nvidia 8800 GTS 320Mb
    Seagate 250gb sata
    Hec 550watts
    Viewsonic VA1912WB



  5. #55
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    650
    Quote Originally Posted by ferds
    hi guys,

    i think its best that we give DM some time.

    heres what he said today on the other forum
    The guy makes a good point in that thread though. If for some reason you had a c2D compatible 945 mobo then this e4300 would be the ideal match-up for it.

  6. #56
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Posts
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by Phosphate
    The guy makes a good point in that thread though. If for some reason you had a c2D compatible 945 mobo then this e4300 would be the ideal match-up for it.
    truth.com! That way you could even reach 2,7 GHz on Asrock ConroeXfire.

  7. #57
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    457
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave DEF
    ever thought about visiting a psychiatrist?
    As everyone may already know 1333MHz FSB Intel Core 2 Duo (including E6850, E6750 and E6650) will be releasing in Q3 2007, Intel just announced more choices to customers. Besides the 3 models mentioned above, Intel will also release Core 2 Duo E6390 in Q3 2007, E4200 and E4400 in Q2 2007. Core 2 Duo E6390 targets to the market of E6300 and E6400, and the two members from Core 2 Duo E4000 family are designed to replace Netburst Pentium D.

    When compared with the specification, we may find that Core 2 Duo E6390 actually is a value version of Core 2 Duo E6300 and E6400. With the same speed of Core 2 Duo E6400 at 2.13GHz, and also 2MB L2 Cache and 1066MHz FSB, everything is the same in Core 2 Duo E6390, but the availability of Intel Virtualization Technology (VT) and vPRO Technology. These functions are disabled in Core 2 Duo E6390.

    On the other side, the two members from Core 2 Duo E4000 family to be released in Q2 2007 include E4200 and E4400. These are running at 1.6GHz and 2GHz respectively, and same as the most of Core 2 Duo, these models contain 2MB L2 Cache and support 1066MHz FSB. Together with E4300 which will be released on 21 Jan 2007, Core 2 Duo E4000 family aim to replace Netburst Pentium D.

    However, ironically, at the time we are still waiting for Intel Core 2 Duo E4300, Intel has announced the out-of-production schedule to manufacturers. The last order of Core 2 Duo E4300 will be in Q4 2004 (should be 2007), production terminates in Q1 2008 and last shipment is Q3 2008.
    Maybe its you that needs to go see the psych, I heard it can do wonders for gullable fools such as yourself:LOL: I too have a new chip, its called the Optakron Retardikus 5000 and it clocks really well, will have results for you real soon.

  8. #58
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    650
    1333 FSB C2D's. So basically were are talking 333 FSB out of the box. Will this be accompanied by DDR3 memory introduction?

    With DDR3, overclocking that 333 FSB could be interesting.

  9. #59
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Posts
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by Cappie
    Maybe its you that needs to go see the psych, I heard it can do wonders for gullable fools such as yourself:LOL: I too have a new chip, its called the Optakron Retardikus 5000 and it clocks really well, will have results for you real soon.
    what are you quoting? inquirer? always good to trust a source with a typo (Q4 of 2004) in it...

    we'll see...

    peace

    Dave

  10. #60
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Brasil
    Posts
    69
    Looking foward to some OC results, but something tells me that those e4300 will not make above 3ghz with some vcore...

  11. #61
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    129
    Quote Originally Posted by saboya
    Looking foward to some OC results, but something tells me that those e4300 will not make above 3ghz with some vcore...
    I'm also looking foward to seeing some OC results. Depending on how these go I may get one myself.

    I actually reckon they will make 3ghz really easy with hardly any increase in the vcore.

  12. #62
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    480
    Quote Originally Posted by Cappie
    Maybe its you that needs to go see the psych, I heard it can do wonders for gullable fools such as yourself:LOL: I too have a new chip, its called the Optakron Retardikus 5000 and it clocks really well, will have results for you real soon.
    Dude you really need to chill, just because the guy hasnt had time or doesnt care to post results doesnt mean its a fake.

    If you dont have anything positive or even informative to contriute then go find a corner and sit in it.

    Its not acceptable to be an ass just because your doing it from behind a keyboard.

    Asus Commando 6600 week 28B @4.2 1.475v(1.475 in bios) 525x8 4-4-3-4 1150mhz 2.3v
    2x1gb Patriot Pc-8000 Xbl | X1600 Pro | 2 Wd 36gb Raptors
    Seagate 750gb | Vapoli V2000B SS | Pc p&c Black Silencer 750


    Quote Originally Posted by chron
    Its DDR2 - doesn't it need to be ran with 2 sticks at a time?

  13. #63
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    457
    You'r entitled to your opinion and so am I, if I think he's a fake then thats my bleeping perogative.

  14. #64
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    896

  15. #65
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    805
    I stole away some time last night to play with the processor before I went to bed (I am too tired ). This overclock is done very quickly without tweaking or paying attention to other details. No benchmark, sorry guys.

    I also didn't use the BadAxe2 to OC, I am having some quirks with OCing on BadAxe2 so I switched to Abit AW9D-MAX.

    This is a 50% overclock, this should be more than enough headroom for some mild OCer but not enough for the more extreme. By the way, this is not the maximum OC, this just the OC I tried during a one and a-half hour period of stress testing. Running all on stock cooling, voltage, timing, etc.

    edit: removed images
    Last edited by death metal; 05-22-2007 at 07:09 PM.

    Visit Site: FanBoyReview™
    TEST
    (c)1999-2010 DM
    All rights reserve, All wrongs deserve

    Yeehaw
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER
    ROFL, the "retail" clause now.

    Let it go man, Conroe is gonna punk AMD bad.

  16. #66
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    117
    Thanks very much for that death metal

    Looking forward to more results.
    Last edited by AgentVX; 11-16-2006 at 05:18 AM.
    Use in a cool dry place away from direct sunlight. Keep out of reach of n00bs. Overclock within 24 hours of opening.
    Do not read instructions before proceeding, do not use only as directed. May cause frustration, late nights and empty wallets.
    If symptoms persist please consult your hardware professional.
    -AgentVX-

  17. #67
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    650
    Thanks Death,

    It will be interesting to see if this chip can approach the other allendales in terms of the max OC ceiling. Certainly it will be good for people with cheap DDR2 memory kits.

    I may hold off buying a CPU till this one comes out.

  18. #68
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Posts
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by death metal
    This is a 50% overclock, this should be more than enough headroom for some mild OCer but not enough for the more extreme. By the way, this is not the maximum OC, this just the OC I tried during a one and a-half hour period of stress testing. Running all on stock cooling, voltage, timing, etc.
    this is all I needed to know! THX A LOT!

  19. #69
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cairo
    Posts
    2,366
    Quote Originally Posted by Cappie
    Maybe its you that needs to go see the psych, I heard it can do wonders for gullable fools such as yourself:LOL: I too have a new chip, its called the Optakron Retardikus 5000 and it clocks really well, will have results for you real soon.
    What is wrong with this forum if some one didn?t like the post he just cam out and say faker faker faker go get him
    What is wrong with you the guy is posting a validated link to an Allendale with 2mb of cache and multi of 9X how the hell on earth he can fake something like that and he is an old member much much older that you why he wona ruin everything, post a fake image and run away so next time please if you don?t like the thread don?t post just leave it alone
    ________
    Ford Cargo specifications
    Last edited by kemo; 01-31-2011 at 12:08 PM.

  20. #70
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    253
    Quote Originally Posted by death metal
    This is a 50% overclock, this should be more than enough headroom for some mild OCer but not enough for the more extreme. By the way, this is not the maximum OC, this just the OC I tried during a one and a-half hour period of stress testing. Running all on stock cooling, voltage, timing, etc.
    Thanks for the report, I am very interested in the E4300 too.

    Now I am wondering why the results are so low, 300 FSB, 2.7GHz?


    I also didn't use the BadAxe2 to OC, I am having some quirks with OCing on BadAxe2...
    If you have time, could you please describe these Bad Axe 2 "quirks' for those of us thinking about buying that board.
    Last edited by bofors; 11-16-2006 at 02:07 AM.

  21. #71
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    296
    9x3 is 27 so what do you mean low

    This looks good to me anyway so when is the cpu out because I was about to buy a e6300

    Thanks DM

  22. #72
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Angeles City, Philippines
    Posts
    133
    who wants to see a E4300 95% OC on stock cooler?

    http://www.tipidpc.com/viewtopic.php?tid=77276

    THANKS DM!!
    Intel E6300 L927 @ 3.4ghz w/ Infinity
    Asus P5B Deluxe 0910
    Corsair 6400C5 2X512
    Nvidia 8800 GTS 320Mb
    Seagate 250gb sata
    Hec 550watts
    Viewsonic VA1912WB



  23. #73
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    253
    Quote Originally Posted by 775911
    9x3 is 27 so what do you mean low

    This looks good to me anyway so when is the cpu out because I was about to buy a e6300
    I mean, that I had expected the E4300 to overclock like an E6600 (which also a has a multiplier of 9). These results are not even close to what I was looking for here: FSB 400, 3.6GHz.
    Last edited by bofors; 11-16-2006 at 10:49 PM.

  24. #74
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    253
    Quote Originally Posted by ferds
    who wants to see a E4300 95% OC on stock cooler?

    http://www.tipidpc.com/viewtopic.php?tid=77276
    This is what I was expecting, 2.7GHz, 300 FSB was low.

  25. #75
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    296
    That is impressive, 3.5k on a stock cooler A pi time would be good but I presume its not that far off what a e6300 would do, a bit slower because of the fsb being 110 less probably

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •