he's a faker and the screenshot is faked, noone has a E4300, only Intel has so far and unless he's leaking secret intel stuff I don't think we'll get another reply from him.
he's a faker and the screenshot is faked, noone has a E4300, only Intel has so far and unless he's leaking secret intel stuff I don't think we'll get another reply from him.
ever thought about visiting a psychiatrist?Originally Posted by Cappie
no news on supply from my guyOriginally Posted by erwinz
hi guys,
i think its best that we give DM some time.
heres what he said today on the other forum
Heya guys, I'll try to post updates, maybe OC updates, but just CPU-Z screenie.
Too busy lately, no time to play...
Intel E6300 L927 @ 3.4ghz w/ Infinity
Asus P5B Deluxe 0910
Corsair 6400C5 2X512
Nvidia 8800 GTS 320Mb
Seagate 250gb sata
Hec 550watts
Viewsonic VA1912WB
The guy makes a good point in that thread though. If for some reason you had a c2D compatible 945 mobo then this e4300 would be the ideal match-up for it.Originally Posted by ferds
truth.com! That way you could even reach 2,7 GHz on Asrock ConroeXfire.Originally Posted by Phosphate
Originally Posted by Dave DEFMaybe its you that needs to go see the psych, I heard it can do wonders for gullable fools such as yourself:LOL: I too have a new chip, its called the Optakron Retardikus 5000 and it clocks really well, will have results for you real soon.As everyone may already know 1333MHz FSB Intel Core 2 Duo (including E6850, E6750 and E6650) will be releasing in Q3 2007, Intel just announced more choices to customers. Besides the 3 models mentioned above, Intel will also release Core 2 Duo E6390 in Q3 2007, E4200 and E4400 in Q2 2007. Core 2 Duo E6390 targets to the market of E6300 and E6400, and the two members from Core 2 Duo E4000 family are designed to replace Netburst Pentium D.
When compared with the specification, we may find that Core 2 Duo E6390 actually is a value version of Core 2 Duo E6300 and E6400. With the same speed of Core 2 Duo E6400 at 2.13GHz, and also 2MB L2 Cache and 1066MHz FSB, everything is the same in Core 2 Duo E6390, but the availability of Intel Virtualization Technology (VT) and vPRO Technology. These functions are disabled in Core 2 Duo E6390.
On the other side, the two members from Core 2 Duo E4000 family to be released in Q2 2007 include E4200 and E4400. These are running at 1.6GHz and 2GHz respectively, and same as the most of Core 2 Duo, these models contain 2MB L2 Cache and support 1066MHz FSB. Together with E4300 which will be released on 21 Jan 2007, Core 2 Duo E4000 family aim to replace Netburst Pentium D.
However, ironically, at the time we are still waiting for Intel Core 2 Duo E4300, Intel has announced the out-of-production schedule to manufacturers. The last order of Core 2 Duo E4300 will be in Q4 2004 (should be 2007), production terminates in Q1 2008 and last shipment is Q3 2008.
1333 FSB C2D's. So basically were are talking 333 FSB out of the box. Will this be accompanied by DDR3 memory introduction?
With DDR3, overclocking that 333 FSB could be interesting.
what are you quoting? inquirer? always good to trust a source with a typo (Q4 of 2004) in it...Originally Posted by Cappie
we'll see...
peace
Dave
Looking foward to some OC results, but something tells me that those e4300 will not make above 3ghz with some vcore...
I'm also looking foward to seeing some OC results. Depending on how these go I may get one myself.Originally Posted by saboya
I actually reckon they will make 3ghz really easy with hardly any increase in the vcore.
E6300 | ASUS P5N-E SLi | 2GB Corsair Value Select | XFX 512MB 7950GT
OCAU Video Card Comparison Chart // OCAU Video Card Review Thread
OCAU DDR2 Overclocking Results Database // Corsair Value Select PC5300 Overclocking
$25 Worth Of Torture (6200TC) // ASUS P5N-e SLi Mini Review // PCI-e Frequency Clocking Review
How To Flash The SPD File On Your Ram
OCAU Video Card Forum
Dude you really need to chill, just because the guy hasnt had time or doesnt care to post results doesnt mean its a fake.Originally Posted by Cappie
If you dont have anything positive or even informative to contriute then go find a corner and sit in it.
Its not acceptable to be an ass just because your doing it from behind a keyboard.
Asus Commando 6600 week 28B @4.2 1.475v(1.475 in bios) 525x8 4-4-3-4 1150mhz 2.3v
2x1gb Patriot Pc-8000 Xbl | X1600 Pro | 2 Wd 36gb Raptors
Seagate 750gb | Vapoli V2000B SS | Pc p&c Black Silencer 750
Originally Posted by chron
You'r entitled to your opinion and so am I, if I think he's a fake then thats my bleeping perogative.
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=137179
Did you happen to miss that?
I stole away some time last night to play with the processor before I went to bed (I am too tired ). This overclock is done very quickly without tweaking or paying attention to other details. No benchmark, sorry guys.
I also didn't use the BadAxe2 to OC, I am having some quirks with OCing on BadAxe2 so I switched to Abit AW9D-MAX.
This is a 50% overclock, this should be more than enough headroom for some mild OCer but not enough for the more extreme. By the way, this is not the maximum OC, this just the OC I tried during a one and a-half hour period of stress testing. Running all on stock cooling, voltage, timing, etc.
edit: removed images
Last edited by death metal; 05-22-2007 at 07:09 PM.
Visit Site: FanBoyReview™
TEST
(c)1999-2010 DM
All rights reserve, All wrongs deserve
Yeehaw
Originally Posted by FUGGER
Thanks very much for that death metal
Looking forward to more results.
Last edited by AgentVX; 11-16-2006 at 05:18 AM.
Use in a cool dry place away from direct sunlight. Keep out of reach of n00bs. Overclock within 24 hours of opening.
Do not read instructions before proceeding, do not use only as directed. May cause frustration, late nights and empty wallets.
If symptoms persist please consult your hardware professional.
-AgentVX-
Thanks Death,
It will be interesting to see if this chip can approach the other allendales in terms of the max OC ceiling. Certainly it will be good for people with cheap DDR2 memory kits.
I may hold off buying a CPU till this one comes out.
this is all I needed to know! THX A LOT!Originally Posted by death metal
What is wrong with this forum if some one didn?t like the post he just cam out and say faker faker faker go get himOriginally Posted by Cappie
What is wrong with you the guy is posting a validated link to an Allendale with 2mb of cache and multi of 9X how the hell on earth he can fake something like that and he is an old member much much older that you why he wona ruin everything, post a fake image and run away so next time please if you don?t like the thread don?t post just leave it alone
________
Ford Cargo specifications
Last edited by kemo; 01-31-2011 at 12:08 PM.
Thanks for the report, I am very interested in the E4300 too.Originally Posted by death metal
Now I am wondering why the results are so low, 300 FSB, 2.7GHz?
If you have time, could you please describe these Bad Axe 2 "quirks' for those of us thinking about buying that board.I also didn't use the BadAxe2 to OC, I am having some quirks with OCing on BadAxe2...
Last edited by bofors; 11-16-2006 at 02:07 AM.
9x3 is 27 so what do you mean low
This looks good to me anyway so when is the cpu out because I was about to buy a e6300
Thanks DM
who wants to see a E4300 95% OC on stock cooler?
http://www.tipidpc.com/viewtopic.php?tid=77276
THANKS DM!!
Intel E6300 L927 @ 3.4ghz w/ Infinity
Asus P5B Deluxe 0910
Corsair 6400C5 2X512
Nvidia 8800 GTS 320Mb
Seagate 250gb sata
Hec 550watts
Viewsonic VA1912WB
I mean, that I had expected the E4300 to overclock like an E6600 (which also a has a multiplier of 9). These results are not even close to what I was looking for here: FSB 400, 3.6GHz.Originally Posted by 775911
Last edited by bofors; 11-16-2006 at 10:49 PM.
This is what I was expecting, 2.7GHz, 300 FSB was low.Originally Posted by ferds
That is impressive, 3.5k on a stock cooler A pi time would be good but I presume its not that far off what a e6300 would do, a bit slower because of the fsb being 110 less probably
Bookmarks