Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 93

Thread: SLI on 975X, official Nvidia response

  1. #1
    Xtreme Owner Charles Wirth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    11,653

    Thumbs down SLI on 975X, official Nvidia response

    Sean Cleveland
    Technical Marketing Manager
    Platform Product Reviews
    NVIDIA Corporation

    Nvidia will not enable SLI support for Intel chipsets.

    Sorry about the short answer, the reasoning was a bit odd.

    "Intel chipsets do not provide enough bandwidth to support SLI"
    Intel 9990XE @ 5.1Ghz
    ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
    GTX 2080 ti Galax Hall of Fame
    64GB Galax Hall of Fame
    Intel Optane
    Platimax 1245W

    Intel 3175X
    Asus Dominus Extreme
    GRX 1080ti Galax Hall of Fame
    96GB Patriot Steel
    Intel Optane 900P RAID

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    775
    I don't even care... we have cf :P
    Core Quad Q9300
    ASUS P5Q-PRO
    4GB RAM
    Ati Radeon 4890
    Enermax Liberty 620w

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    279
    Load up the 66.81 drivers with a couple 6800 cards, works just fine.
    Its all political.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    16
    What about the patch that Asrock released which apparently made the drivers think that they were running on an Nvidia chipset no matter what chipset the board actually used, has anyone tried them?

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,363
    Really? Strange considering Xfire uses more bandwith....

    It appears they have forgotten that more than half of the market is strictly Intel and that will continue to grow with the arrival of Conroe.
    NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
    Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
    Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
    PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
    Asus P8Z68-V Pro
    Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

    Heatware: 13-0-0

  6. #6
    X.I.P
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,964
    In Fact!
    They Just Can Not Agree With $$,$$$,$$$, Thats All

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    279
    Quote Originally Posted by Sentential
    Really? Strange considering Xfire uses more bandwith....

    It appears they have forgotten that more than half of the market is strictly Intel and that will continue to grow with the arrival of Conroe.
    Funnily enough the drivers lost support for Intel chipsets around about the time the NForce 4 Intel launched.

  8. #8
    ln2nl
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,659
    but with hacked drivers sli is possible ... so huh?
    *EDITed by IFMU*
    Signature Removed by XS Staff for not following XS Policies

    Forum Policies

  9. #9

  10. #10
    Muslim Overclocker
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,786
    Why the heck would they do that?

    Someone over at nvidia is trying to make people buy nvidia boards? They don't even have a decent Intel chip available

    My watercooling experience

    Water
    Scythe Gentle Typhoons 120mm 1850RPM
    Thermochill PA120.3 Radiator
    Enzotech Sapphire Rev.A CPU Block
    Laing DDC 3.2
    XSPC Dual Pump Reservoir
    Primochill Pro LRT Red 1/2"
    Bitspower fittings + water temp sensor

    Rig
    E8400 | 4GB HyperX PC8500 | Corsair HX620W | ATI HD4870 512MB


    I see what I see, and you see what you see. I can't make you see what I see, but I can tell you what I see is not what you see. Truth is, we see what we want to see, and what we want to see is what those around us see. And what we don't see is... well, conspiracies.



  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    279
    Quote Originally Posted by Waus-mod
    but with hacked drivers sli is possible ... so huh?
    Can you link me up to some? Got a few people at work who would be interested in seeing them

  12. #12
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands - Rotterdam
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by ahmad
    Why the heck would they do that?

    Someone over at nvidia is trying to make people buy nvidia boards? They don't even have a decent Intel chip available
    Xfire is still more expansive than SLI, and I'm just a poor student

  13. #13
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Wild West, USA
    Posts
    655
    heh stupid Nvidia. Well if it goes like that CF and Conroe for systems freaks
    Abit IC7 P4 2.8a @4.21 | P4 3.4e @4.9 | Gainward 6800GT GS @486/1386
    Asus P4P800 SE Dothan 730-PM @ 2900 | EVGA 6800 Ultra GS @521/1376

    e8400@4.3G & 8800GTS G92 800/1932/1132 as gaming rig 24/7

    Custom self build chillbox with watercooling @-28c 24/7 | chilled wc " cpu -18c idle/-3c load
    3DMark 2005 Score Dothan & 6800U
    3DMark 2005 Score p4 & 6800GT

  14. #14
    Xtreme Owner Charles Wirth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    11,653
    No Conroe support as well.
    Intel 9990XE @ 5.1Ghz
    ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
    GTX 2080 ti Galax Hall of Fame
    64GB Galax Hall of Fame
    Intel Optane
    Platimax 1245W

    Intel 3175X
    Asus Dominus Extreme
    GRX 1080ti Galax Hall of Fame
    96GB Patriot Steel
    Intel Optane 900P RAID

  15. #15
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    venezuela caracas
    Posts
    6,460
    why would you support a chipset competitor?????

    is the most logical answer..... as long as nvidia is making chipsets for intel plataform you wont see SLI in intels chipsets
    Incoming new computer after 5 long years

    YOU want to FIGHT CANCER OR AIDS join us at WCG and help to have a better FUTURE

  16. #16
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands - Rotterdam
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER
    No Conroe support as well.
    you mean like no support for conroe in NVidea chipset's?
    so, we will never see a conroe running on SLI?
    (ok, maby hacked or something like waus said)

  17. #17
    ¿
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    4,772
    So you can sell your cards to buyers with an Intel platform, this will hurt Nvidia.

  18. #18
    Xtreme Owner Charles Wirth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    11,653
    Some people prefer Nvidia based graphics, its a shame that Nvidia wants to play this way. it only hurts them and their customer base.

    I forsee more Crossfire sales.
    Intel 9990XE @ 5.1Ghz
    ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
    GTX 2080 ti Galax Hall of Fame
    64GB Galax Hall of Fame
    Intel Optane
    Platimax 1245W

    Intel 3175X
    Asus Dominus Extreme
    GRX 1080ti Galax Hall of Fame
    96GB Patriot Steel
    Intel Optane 900P RAID

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Broomfield, CO
    Posts
    3,882
    This will remove nVidia from the ORB.

    PR guys from nVidia, are you listening? I have owned 12 7800GTX/7900GTX cards in the last year. My last ATI purchase was an x850XT when it first came out. Guess who just bought a pair of x1900XTX cards for CF? Yep....this guy.

    Here's what he really wanted to say: "Intel chipsets does not provide enough bandwidth money to support SLI"
    Last edited by freecableguy; 04-19-2006 at 12:44 PM.

  20. #20
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Oslo, Norway => Across the pond
    Posts
    200
    Well then... Looks like I will swap GFX supplier if Conroe does turn out to be what the previews show it to be.

    No SLI support is kinda a nobrainer if you ask me. *doh*

  21. #21
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands - Rotterdam
    Posts
    583
    seems almost to bad to be true.

    How can NVidea be that stupid?
    yo fugger, april foolsday is over huh

  22. #22
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX USA
    Posts
    1,381
    lol, i definately wouldn't blame nvidia for this, this is obviously an intel move

    i had asked in another thread(half-jokingly, half-had to make sure) about who made i???x chipsets, which is of course, intel

    this is pure market cornering for intel, i laughed way too hard when i knew intel made the chipsets

    it is NOT a question of why NVIDIA DOSN'T WANT to make chipsets for intel,
    it IS why does INTEL NOT WANT nvidia to make chipsets for intel?

    and because intel dosn't want nvidia making chipsets for them, nvidia said, fine, no sli, which IMHO, is a good moral decision, i give nvidia props

    now, this is great for ati, who, obviously, dosn't give a crap

    of course, i'll still buy ati(simply because IN MY OWN EXPERIENCE, they produce better cards), as for processor/platform, i'll buy best bang for buck, so i hope amd puts up something to compete w/ conroe, give me more choices
    Athlon XP-M 2500+ 0343MPMW The King is Dead!
    Phenom II X6 1090T 1025GPMW Long Live the King!

    -------------------------------------------
    I'm from the church of the operating room

  23. #23
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by freecableguy
    This will remove nVidia from the ORB.
    MMouse and Kingp|n say it won't

  24. #24
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    279
    Quote Originally Posted by VulgarHandle
    it is NOT a question of why NVIDIA DOSN'T WANT to make chipsets for intel,
    it IS why does INTEL NOT WANT nvidia to make chipsets for intel?

    and because intel dosn't want nvidia making chipsets for them, nvidia said, fine, no sli, which IMHO, is a good moral decision, i give nvidia props
    That makes perfect sense, except for the fact that Intel granted NVIDIA a license to produce chipsets for there platforms, NVIDIA refuse to give Intel a license to use SLI.

    So actually, it makes no sense at all.

  25. #25
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Stafford, UK
    Posts
    810
    I'm still surprised no one has a 3rd party patch for this... surely it can't be THAT hard to strip chipset detection from the drivers. Correct me if I'm wrong though (no technical background at all here )

    Suman

    VENOM: DFI LP LT X38-T2R ~ Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 4.00GHz ~ 4GB OCZ Blade LV DDR2-1150 ~ Radeon R9 380 4GB ~ Crucial C300 64GB ~ Seasonic X-750 ~ Dell U2913WM 29" ~ Win 7 Ultimate x64
    LAIKA: Alienware Alpha R2 ~ Core i5-6400T @ 2.20GHz / 2.80GHz ~ 16GB Ballistix Sport LT DDR4-2133 ~ GeForce GTX 960 4GB ~ Crucial MX300 275GB ~ LG OLED55B7A 55" TV ~ Win 10 Home x64
    BLADE: Razer Blade 14" (2013) ~ Core i7-4702HQ @ 2.20GHz / 3.20GHz ~ 8GB DDR3-1600 ~ GeForce GTX 765M 2GB ~ Samsung 840 EVO mSATA 500GB ~ Win 7 Ultimate x64
    E-MAIL

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •